Literature DB >> 26232375

Administration of romosozumab improves vertebral trabecular and cortical bone as assessed with quantitative computed tomography and finite element analysis.

Christian Graeff1, Graeme M Campbell2, Jaime Peña2, Jan Borggrefe3, Desmond Padhi4, Allegra Kaufman4, Sung Chang4, Cesar Libanati4, Claus-Christian Glüer5.   

Abstract

Romosozumab inhibits sclerostin, thereby increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption. This dual effect of romosozumab leads to rapid and substantial increases in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In a phase 1b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, romosozumab or placebo was administered to 32 women and 16 men with low aBMD for 3 months, with a further 3-month follow-up: women received six doses of 1 or 2mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or three doses of 2 or 3mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W); men received 1mg/kg Q2W or 3mg/kg Q4W. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scans at lumbar (L1-2) vertebrae and high-resolution QCT (HR-QCT) scans at thoracic vertebra (T12) were analyzed in a subset of subjects at baseline, month 3, and month 6. The QCT subset included 24 romosozumab and 9 placebo subjects and the HR-QCT subset included 11 romosozumab and 3 placebo subjects. The analyses pooled the romosozumab doses. Linear finite element modeling of bone stiffness was performed. Compared with placebo, the romosozumab group showed improvements at month 3 for trabecular BMD by QCT and HR-QCT, HR-QCT trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV) and separation, density-weighted cortical thickness, and QCT stiffness (all p<0.05). At month 6, improvements from baseline were observed in QCT trabecular BMD and stiffness, and in HR-QCT BMD, trabecular BV/TV and separation, density-weighted cortical thickness, and stiffness in the romosozumab group (all p<0.05 compared with placebo). The mean (SE) increase in HR-QCT stiffness with romosozumab from baseline was 26.9% ± 6.8% and 35.0% ±6.8% at months 3 and 6, respectively; subjects administered placebo had changes of -2.7% ± 13.4% and -6.4% ± 13.4%, respectively. In conclusion, romosozumab administered for 3 months resulted in rapid and large improvements in trabecular and cortical bone mass and structure as well as whole bone stiffness, which continued 3 months after the last romosozumab dose.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone mineral density; Bone quantitative computed tomography; Romosozumab; Sclerostin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26232375     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  20 in total

Review 1.  X-ray-based quantitative osteoporosis imaging at the spine.

Authors:  M T Löffler; N Sollmann; K Mei; A Valentinitsch; P B Noël; J S Kirschke; T Baum
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Exploiting the WNT Signaling Pathway for Clinical Purposes.

Authors:  Mark L Johnson; Robert R Recker
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  [Novel anti-osteoporotic drugs on the horizon].

Authors:  A Knauerhase; H S Willenberg
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 4.  Sclerostin antibodies in osteoporosis: latest evidence and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  Michael R McClung
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 5.346

5.  Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; P Zysset; C C Glüer; M McClung; E Biver; D D Pierroz; S L Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  A xenograft model to evaluate the bone forming effects of sclerostin antibody in human bone derived from pediatric osteogenesis imperfecta patients.

Authors:  Rachel K Surowiec; Lauren F Battle; Ferrous S Ward; Stephen H Schlecht; Basma M Khoury; Christopher Robbins; Edward M Wojtys; Michelle S Caird; Kenneth M Kozloff
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Controversy of physiological vs. pharmacological effects of BMP signaling: Constitutive activation of BMP type IA receptor-dependent signaling in osteoblast lineage enhances bone formation and resorption, not affecting net bone mass.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Kamiya; Phimon Atsawasuwan; Danese M Joiner; Erik I Waldorff; Steve Goldstein; Mitsuo Yamauchi; Yuji Mishina
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  Molecular Targeted Therapy for the Bone Loss Secondary to Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis Using Medications for Osteoporosis: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Takashi Ohnishi; Yuki Ogawa; Kota Suda; Miki Komatsu; Satoko Matsumoto Harmon; Mitsuru Asukai; Masahiko Takahata; Norimasa Iwasaki; Akio Minami
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Sclerostin Inhibition in the Management of Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Natasha M Appelman-Dijkstra; Socrates E Papapoulos
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Conventional MRI-based subchondral trabecular biomarkers as predictors of knee osteoarthritis progression: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Farhad Pishgar; Ali Guermazi; Frank W Roemer; Thomas M Link; Shadpour Demehri
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 7.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.