Literature DB >> 26232210

Surgical Management of Giant Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations: A Single Center Experience over 32 years.

Kevin A Reinard1, Aqueel H Pabaney2, Azam Basheer1, Scott B Phillips3, Max K Kole1, Ghaus M Malik1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of giant intracranial arteriovenous malformations (gAVMs) is a formidable challenge for neurosurgeons and carries significant morbidity and mortality rates for patients compared with smaller AVMs. In this study, we reviewed the treatments, angiographic results, and clinical outcomes in 64 patients with gAVMs who were treated at Henry Ford Hospital between 1980 and 2012.
METHODS: The arteriovenous malformation (AVM) database at our institution was queried for patients with gAVMs (≥ 6 cm) and data regarding patient demographics, presentation, AVM angioarchitecture, and treatments were collected. Functional outcomes as well as complications were analyzed.
RESULTS: Of the 64 patients, 33 (51.6%) were female and 31 (48.4%) were male, with an average age of 45.7 years (SD ± 15.5). The most common symptoms on presentation were headaches (50%), seizures (50%), and hemorrhage (41%). The mean AVM size was 6.65 cm (range, 6-9 cm). Only 6 AVMs (9.4%) were located in the posterior fossa. The most common Spetzler-Martin grade was V, seen in 64% of patients. Of the 64 patients, 42 (66%) underwent surgical excision, 10 (15.5%) declined any treatment, 8 (12.5%) were deemed inoperable and followed conservatively, 2 (3%) had stand-alone embolization, 1 (1.5%) had embolization before stereotactic radiosurgery, and 1 (1.5%) received stereotactic radiosurgery only. Complete obliteration was achieved in 90% of the surgical patients. Mortality rate was 19% in the surgical cohort compared with 22% in the observation cohort (P = 0.770).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of gAVMs carries significant morbidity and mortality; however, good outcomes are attainable with a multimodal treatment approach in carefully selected patients.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Embolization; Giant intracranial arteriovenous malformations (gAVMs); Hemorrhage; Management; Microsurgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26232210     DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.07.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World Neurosurg        ISSN: 1878-8750            Impact factor:   2.104


  4 in total

1.  Contemporary management of brain arteriovenous malformations in mainland China: a web-based nationwide questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Xiangyu Meng; Li Ma; Yang Zhao; Ye Gu; Hengwei Jin; Dezhi Gao; Youxiang Li; Shibin Sun; Ali Liu; Yuanli Zhao; Xiaolin Chen; Shuo Wang
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2020-09-01

2.  A proposed classification for assessing rupture risk in patients with intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Felipe Padilla-Vazquez; Marco A Zenteno; Jorge Balderrama; Victor Hugo Escobar-de la Garma; Daniel San Juan; Carlos Trenado
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-12-27

Review 3.  Highlights on Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation Treatment Using Combined Embolization and Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Why Outcomes are Controversial?

Authors:  Faustina N A Sackey; Nathaneal R Pinsker; Benjamin N Baako
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2017-05-22

4.  RNA Sequencing Reveals the Activation of Wnt Signaling in Low Flow Rate Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Ran Huo; Weilun Fu; Hao Li; Yuming Jiao; Zihan Yan; Linjian Wang; Jie Wang; Shuo Wang; Yong Cao; Jizong Zhao
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.