Literature DB >> 26232196

Insights into emergency physicians' minds in the seconds before and into a patient encounter.

Thierry Pelaccia1,2, Jacques Tardif3, Emmanuel Triby4, Christine Ammirati5, Catherine Bertrand6, Bernard Charlin7, Valérie Dory8.   

Abstract

Clinical reasoning is a core competency in medical practice. No study has explored clinical reasoning occurring before a clinical encounter, when physicians obtain preliminary information about the patient, and during the first seconds of the observation phase. This paper aims to understand what happens in emergency physicians' minds when they acquire initial information about a patient, and when they first meet a patient. The authors carried out in-depth interviews based on the video recordings of emergency situations filmed in an "own-point-of-view-perspective". 15 expert emergency physicians were interviewed between 2011 and 2012. Researchers analysed data using an interpretive approach based on thematic analysis and constant comparison. Almost all participants used a few critical pieces of information to generate hypotheses even before they actually met the patient. Pre-encounter hypotheses played a key role in the ensuing encounter by directing initial data gathering. Initial data, collected within the first few seconds of the encounter, included the patient's position on the stretcher, the way they had been prepared, their facial expression, their breathing, and their skin colour. Physicians also rapidly appraised the seriousness of the patient's overall condition, which determined their initial goals, i.e. initiating emergency treatment or pursuing the diagnostic investigation. The study brings new insights on what happens at the very beginning of the encounter between emergency physicians and patients. The results obtained from an innovative methodological approach open avenues for the development of clinical reasoning in learners.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical reasoning; Decision making; Dual-process theory; Emergency medicine; Hypotheses generation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26232196     DOI: 10.1007/s11739-015-1283-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intern Emerg Med        ISSN: 1828-0447            Impact factor:   3.397


  30 in total

1.  Heuristics and biases: selected errors in clinical reasoning.

Authors:  A S Elstein
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 2.  Qualitative research in health care. Analysing qualitative data.

Authors:  C Pope; S Ziebland; N Mays
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-01-08

Review 3.  Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains.

Authors:  K Anders Ericsson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 4.  Heuristic decision making.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer; Wolfgang Gaissmaier
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  Using SNAPPS to facilitate the expression of clinical reasoning and uncertainties: a randomized comparison group trial.

Authors:  Terry Wolpaw; Klara K Papp; Georges Bordage
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 6.  Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries?

Authors:  I T Coyne
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  An integrated model of clinical reasoning: dual-process theory of cognition and metacognition.

Authors:  James A Marcum
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 8.  Diagnostic errors.

Authors:  Gloria J Kuhn
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  Does inappropriate selectivity in information use relate to diagnostic errors and patient harm? The diagnosis of patients with dyspnea.

Authors:  Laura Zwaan; Abel Thijs; Cordula Wagner; Daniëlle R M Timmermans
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach: the dual-process theory.

Authors:  Thierry Pelaccia; Jacques Tardif; Emmanuel Triby; Bernard Charlin
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2011-03-14
View more
  4 in total

1.  Do emergency physicians trust their patients?

Authors:  Thierry Pelaccia; Jacques Tardif; Emmanuel Triby; Christine Ammirati; Catherine Bertrand; Bernard Charlin; Valérie Dory
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Diagnostic reasoning in internal medicine: a practical reappraisal: comment.

Authors:  Thierry Pelaccia
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Deconstructing the diagnostic reasoning of human versus artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Thierry Pelaccia; Germain Forestier; Cédric Wemmert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Does the unexpected death of the manikin in a simulation maintain the participants' perceived self-efficacy? An observational prospective study with medical students.

Authors:  Anne Weiss; Morgan Jaffrelot; Jean-Claude Bartier; Thierry Pottecher; Isabelle Borraccia; Gilles Mahoudeau; Eric Noll; Véronique Brunstein; Chloé Delacour; Thierry Pelaccia
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.