Armin Arshi1, Nima Kabir1, Jeremiah R Cohen1, Elizabeth L Lord1, Jeffrey C Wang2, David R McAllister1, Frank A Petrigliano3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.. Electronic address: fpetrigliano@mednet.ucla.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utilization and charges related to physical therapy (PT) after rotator cuff repair in privately insured and Medicare patients and between arthroscopic and open/mini-open repair techniques. METHODS: The PearlDiver insurance database was queried for patients receiving postoperative PT using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Data were available from 2007 to 2011 for United Healthcare and from 2005 to 2011 for Medicare patients. Patients undergoing arthroscopic (CPT 29827) or open/mini-open approaches (CPT 23410, 23412, 23420) were identified in both populations. Utilization was determined by both the percentage of patients with at least one postoperative PT-related code and the average number of encounters per patient. Per-patient average charge was determined by dividing total charges within the billing period by the patient total. RESULTS: A total of 365,891 patients undergoing rotator cuff repair were identified. There was an increase in the number of arthroscopic repairs (+29.1%, P = .027, United Healthcare; +78.9%, P < .001, Medicare) and a decrease in the number of open/mini-open repairs (-18.2%, P = .038, United Healthcare; -18.2%, P < .001, Medicare) across the study period. At 6 months postoperatively, PT utilization was greater in the United Healthcare groups (82.9% arthroscopic, 81.0% open/mini-open) than in the Medicare groups (41.8% arthroscopic, 43.2% open/mini-open). Utilization-weighted per-patient average charge was comparable among all 4 groups, with slightly higher charges in the United Healthcare groups ($3,376 arthroscopic, $3,251 open/mini-open) compared with the Medicare groups ($2,940 arthroscopic, $2,807 open/mini-open). The United Healthcare groups had a greater number of utilization-weighted billed encounters (36.1 for open/mini-open, 9.5 for arthroscopic) than their Medicare counterparts (12.8 open/mini-open, 16.7 arthroscopic). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of PT after rotator cuff repair is substantially higher in privately insured than in Medicare patients. Utilization rates appear to be comparable between surgical approaches. Per-patient costs were comparable irrespective of surgical approach and insurance modality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, economic.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utilization and charges related to physical therapy (PT) after rotator cuff repair in privately insured and Medicare patients and between arthroscopic and open/mini-open repair techniques. METHODS: The PearlDiver insurance database was queried for patients receiving postoperative PT using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Data were available from 2007 to 2011 for United Healthcare and from 2005 to 2011 for Medicare patients. Patients undergoing arthroscopic (CPT 29827) or open/mini-open approaches (CPT 23410, 23412, 23420) were identified in both populations. Utilization was determined by both the percentage of patients with at least one postoperative PT-related code and the average number of encounters per patient. Per-patient average charge was determined by dividing total charges within the billing period by the patient total. RESULTS: A total of 365,891 patients undergoing rotator cuff repair were identified. There was an increase in the number of arthroscopic repairs (+29.1%, P = .027, United Healthcare; +78.9%, P < .001, Medicare) and a decrease in the number of open/mini-open repairs (-18.2%, P = .038, United Healthcare; -18.2%, P < .001, Medicare) across the study period. At 6 months postoperatively, PT utilization was greater in the United Healthcare groups (82.9% arthroscopic, 81.0% open/mini-open) than in the Medicare groups (41.8% arthroscopic, 43.2% open/mini-open). Utilization-weighted per-patient average charge was comparable among all 4 groups, with slightly higher charges in the United Healthcare groups ($3,376 arthroscopic, $3,251 open/mini-open) compared with the Medicare groups ($2,940 arthroscopic, $2,807 open/mini-open). The United Healthcare groups had a greater number of utilization-weighted billed encounters (36.1 for open/mini-open, 9.5 for arthroscopic) than their Medicare counterparts (12.8 open/mini-open, 16.7 arthroscopic). CONCLUSIONS: Utilization of PT after rotator cuff repair is substantially higher in privately insured than in Medicare patients. Utilization rates appear to be comparable between surgical approaches. Per-patient costs were comparable irrespective of surgical approach and insurance modality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, economic.
Authors: Armin Arshi; Jeremiah R Cohen; Jeffrey C Wang; Sharon L Hame; David R McAllister; Kristofer J Jones Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2016-08-31
Authors: Avinesh Agarwalla; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Anirudh K Gowd; Anthony A Romeo; Brian J Cole; Nikhil N Verma; Brian Forsythe Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-05-28
Authors: Nicole M Truong; Nicolas Cevallos; Drew A Lansdown; C Benjamin Ma; Brian T Feeley; Alan L Zhang Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-11-24
Authors: Andrew R Jensen; Peter S Cha; Sai K Devana; Chad Ishmael; Theo Di Pauli von Treuheim; Anthony D'Oro; Jeffrey C Wang; David R McAllister; Frank A Petrigliano Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2017-10-12