Literature DB >> 26231776

Impact and frequency of extra-genitourinary manifestations of prune belly syndrome.

G M Grimsby1, S M Harrison2, C F Granberg3, I H Bernstein4, L A Baker5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prune belly syndrome (PBS) extra-genitourinary (extra-GU) manifestations are serious comorbidities beyond the genitourinary (GU) anomalies of this disease. We hypothesized an underestimation of the reported frequency and understated impact on quality of life (QOL) of extra-GU comorbidities in PBS survivors beyond the newborn period. To assess this, the frequencies of extra-GU manifestations of PBS in a contemporary cohort of living patients were compared to compiled frequencies from published literature. Second, the impact of extra-GU PBS manifestations on patient/family QOL was assessed via a non-validated open-ended survey.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2010 to 2013, PBS survivors were prospectively recruited locally or at three PBS Network National Conventions. The family/subject was asked to complete a detailed PBS questionnaire, non-validated QOL survey, and provide medical records for review. Clinical data were extracted from medical records for local patients. The frequencies of extra-GU manifestations were compared between the contemporary, living cohort and a published literature cohort derived from PubMed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Seven of 706 published studies met criteria for frequencies tabulation of extra-GU PBS manifestations. This largest reported living PBS patient cohort (n = 65) was 99% male with mean age 10 years (1 month-45 years). The living PBS cohort had a statistically significantly higher incidence of gastrointestinal (63%), orthopedic (65%), and cardiopulmonary (49%) diagnoses compared to the compiled published cohort (n = 204). Eleven PBS males and 32 family members completed the QOL survey. Of these, 47% listed at least one non-GU problem (i.e. lung disease, skeletal problems, constipation) as negatively affecting their QOL; 42% listed at least one GU problem (i.e. self-catheterization, recurrent UTIs) as negatively affecting their QOL; 56% reported musculoskeletal surgery and 21% reported gastrointestinal surgery/medication as positively impacting their QOL.
CONCLUSIONS: In this large contemporary series, surviving individuals with PBS had a significantly higher incidence of orthopedic, gastrointestinal, and cardiopulmonary diagnoses than previously reported in PBS publications. From the patient/family QOL perspective, non-GU PBS manifestations negatively impact their QOL and treatment of these non-GU conditions improves their lives. As urologic surgeons for these medically complex patients, it is extremely important to be aware of and prepare for the high incidence of non-GU PBS comorbidities directly impacting the medical and surgical treatment and QOL of PBS patients and their families.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiopulmonary; Constipation; Gastrointestinal; Orthopedic; Prune belly syndrome; Scoliosis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26231776      PMCID: PMC4623962          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  14 in total

1.  Twenty-five-year experience with prune belly syndrome.

Authors:  F J Goulding; R A Garrett
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Prune-belly syndrome. Review of ten cases.

Authors:  T C Carter; G C Tomskey; L S Ozog
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Prune-belly syndrome and general anaesthesia.

Authors:  J G Hannington-Kiff
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  The prune belly syndrome. Report of 20 cases and description of a lethal variant.

Authors:  L W Rogers; P T Ostrow
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Anaesthetic management of "prune belly" syndrome. Case report.

Authors:  A Karamanian; R Kravath; H Nagashima; H H Gentsch
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Prune belly syndrome: clinicopathologic study of 29 cases.

Authors:  J C Manivel; G Pettinato; Y Reinberg; R Gonzalez; B Burke; L P Dehner
Journal:  Pediatr Pathol       Date:  1989

Review 7.  Pathophysiologic and anesthetic correlations of the prune-belly syndrome.

Authors:  J P Holder
Journal:  AANA J       Date:  1989-04

8.  A broader spectrum of abnormalities in the prune belly syndrome.

Authors:  D F Geary; I B MacLusky; B M Churchill; G McLorie
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Anaesthesia in the prune-belly syndrome. A review of 36 cases.

Authors:  A M Henderson; C J Vallis; E Sumner
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Prune belly syndrome: 35 years of experience.

Authors:  K A Burbige; J Amodio; W E Berdon; T W Hensle; W Blanc; J K Lattimer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  7 in total

1.  Phenotypic severity scoring system and categorisation for prune belly syndrome: application to a pilot cohort of 50 living patients.

Authors:  Daniel G Wong; Michelle K Arevalo; Niccolo Maria Passoni; Nida S Iqbal; Thomas Jascur; Adam J Kern; Emma J Sanchez; Arthi Satyanarayan; Jyothsna Gattineni; Linda A Baker
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Copy number variations in a population with prune belly syndrome.

Authors:  Nida S Iqbal; Thomas A Jascur; Steven Harrison; Catherine Chen; Michelle K Arevalo; Daniel Wong; Emma Sanchez; Gwen Grimsby; Kathleen Wilson; Linda A Baker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 3.  Modern management of and update on prune belly syndrome.

Authors:  Roberto I Lopes; Linda A Baker; Francisco T Dénes
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 1.921

4.  Pseudo Prune Belly Syndrome: Diagnosis Revealed by Imaging - A Case Report and Brief Review.

Authors:  Hemal Grover; Sanjay Sethi; Jatin Garg; Amrit Pal Ahluwalia
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2017-05-07

5.  Prune belly syndrome in surviving males can be caused by Hemizygous missense mutations in the X-linked Filamin A gene.

Authors:  Nida S Iqbal; Thomas A Jascur; Steven M Harrison; Angelena B Edwards; Luke T Smith; Erin S Choi; Michelle K Arevalo; Catherine Chen; Shaohua Zhang; Adam J Kern; Angela E Scheuerle; Emma J Sanchez; Chao Xing; Linda A Baker
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.103

6.  Vesicoamniotic Shunting Improves Outcomes in a Subset of Prune Belly Syndrome Patients at a Single Tertiary Center.

Authors:  Jeffrey T White; Kunj R Sheth; Aylin N Bilgutay; David R Roth; Paul F Austin; Edmond T Gonzales; Nicolette K Janzen; Duong D Tu; Angela G Mittal; Chester J Koh; Sheila L Ryan; Carolina Jorgez; Abhishek Seth
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 3.418

7.  Prune belly syndrome: current perspectives.

Authors:  Angela M Arlen; Cayce Nawaf; Andrew J Kirsch
Journal:  Pediatric Health Med Ther       Date:  2019-08-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.