Literature DB >> 26231721

Time scale evolution of avipoxviruses.

Guillaume Le Loc'h1, Stéphane Bertagnoli2, Mariette F Ducatez3.   

Abstract

Avipoxviruses are divided into three clades: canarypox-like viruses, fowlpox-like viruses, and psittacinepox-like viruses. Several molecular clock and demographic models available in the BEAST package were compared on three avipoxvirus genes (P4b, cnpv186 and DNA polymerase genes), which enabled to determine that avipoxviruses evolved at a rate of 2-8×10(-5)substitution/site/year, in the range of poxviruses previously reported evolution rates. In addition, the date of mean time of divergence of avipoxviruses from a common ancestor was extrapolated to be about 10,000-30,000years ago, at the same period as modern poxvirus species. Our findings will facilitate epidemiological investigations on avipoxviruses' spread, origin and circulation.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Avipoxvirus; DNA virus; Evolution; Molecular clock

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26231721      PMCID: PMC7106339          DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Infect Genet Evol        ISSN: 1567-1348            Impact factor:   3.342


Introduction

The Poxviridae virus family is divided into two subfamilies: the Chordopoxvirinae (containing vertebrate viruses) and the Entomopoxvirinae (containing insect viruses). The Chordopoxvirinae is further divided into ten genera: nine mammalian genera and the Avipoxvirus genus, subject of the present study (Haller et al., 2014, Virus Taxonomy, 2013). Based on basic genomic analyses (restriction fragment length polymorphism), avipoxviruses (APV) are currently divided into ten virus species (http://ictvonline.org/) but more recent phylogenetic studies identified three major clades: canarypox-like viruses, fowlpox-like viruses, and psittacinepox-like viruses (Jarmin et al., 2006). Classically, APV were considered to be host species- or order- specific. Genus taxonomy had been based on this concept until recent studies showed that Otididae, Columbidae and Accipitridae can be infected by a large diversity of strains (Abdallah and Hassanin, 2013, Gyuranecz et al., 2013, Jarmin et al., 2006, Le Loc’h et al., 2014). The age of divergence between the three main APV clades has not been estimated. So far, only three genes have been widely studied: fpv094/cnpv121 (locus P4b, hereafter “P4b”), fpv140/cnpv186 (hereafter “cnpv186”) and fpv167/cnpv240 (hereafter “DNA polymerase”) (Gyuranecz et al., 2013, Jarmin et al., 2006, Le Loc’h et al., 2014). Besides, only four APV have been fully sequenced: one Fowlpox virus (Afonso et al., 2000), one Pigeonpox virus, one Penguinpox virus (Offerman et al., 2014), and one Canarypox virus (Tulman et al., 2004). Their analyses have shown large genomic rearrangements and suggest significant genomic diversity among APV. Codivergence between DNA (and in some cases RNA) viruses and their hosts is considered as a main evolution path and should thus be associated with low mutation rates (Holmes, 2004, Holmes and Drummond, 2007, Villarreal and DeFilippis, 2000). Although this codivergence seems more likely in the case of papillomaviruses (millions of years of association, (Bernard et al., 2006)), it is less probable or at least more recent in the case of newly emerging viruses (e.g. the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus evolution (Peiris et al., 2004)). The literature suggests that a short sampling time interval (as compared to the real evolution timescale) biases the calculations (Ho et al., 2007). The aim of the present preliminary study was to assess substitution rate and time to most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of APV using the currently available data. Our results were compared with data available for other poxviruses and a hypothesis on the pathogen’s spread and circulation is given.

Materials and methods

Virus data sets

All available DNA sequences of APV fpv094/cnpv121 (locus P4b, hereafter “P4b”), fpv140/cnpv186 (hereafter “cnpv186”) and fpv167/cnpv240 (hereafter “DNA polymerase”) genes were retrieved from GenBank/EMBL databases. The sampling date (at least year, month and day when available) was collected for each sequence. In case no information was available, the 1st of July of the year of sequence publication was then considered as sample collection date. Only the oldest sequence was kept when identical sequences were available. Table 1 summarizes the details of included APV sequences. For each gene, DNA sequences were translated to amino acid (aa) sequences using BioEdit 7.2.5 (Hall, 1999), the aa sequences were aligned with ClustalX 2.1 (Larkin et al., 2007), and the original BioEdit format aa sequences were aligned with the ClustalX aa aligned sequences before they were reverse-translated in an aligned nucleotide file using BioEdit. The sequence of the APV pigeon/CAPM V-101/CZE/1965 P4b gene (accession number: GU982736) was removed due to many deletions resulting in non-functional short proteins; the P4b sequences of APV isolates from Hawaii EL1.1H1900, APAP16.2H03, and HAAMB.07H02 (accession numbers EF568402 to EF568404) were also removed because they were too short (116 bp). In order to exclude recombinant sequences (as done in Firth et al., 2010) which can bias the calculation, possible recombinant sequences were searched with the Recombinant Identification Program (RIP) (www.hiv.lanl.gov). None were identified. Overall, we analyzed 81 P4b gene sequences (partial open reading frame, ORF: 426 nucleotides) from specimens collected between 1865 and 2014; 31 cnpv186 genes (complete ORF: 933 to 1020 nucleotides) from specimens collected between 1965 and 2014; and 47 DNA polymerase genes (partial ORF: 555 nucleotides) from specimens collected between 1980 and 2014 (Table 1).
Table 1

Avipoxvirus sequences selected for the molecular clock analyses.

GeneVirus cladeStrain/sequence accession numberSampling dateEstimated date
P4bCNPVLeptotila rufaxilla/PE/1865/HM62722618651-Jul-1865
Passer domesticus/ES/1911/HM62722819111-Jul-1911
Parus major/NO/1972/AY45317320-Apr-197220-Apr-1972
Sturnus vulgaris/US/1984/KC01806319841-Jul-1984
Serinus canaria/IT/1985/GQ180203Dec 198515-Dec-1985
Junco hyemalis hyemalis/US/1986/KC01802219861-Jul-1986
Quiscalus major/US/1989/KC01806219891-Jul-1989
Turdus philomelos/IT/1992/GQ180206Feb 199215-Feb-1992
Colinus virginianus ridgwayi/US/1993/KC01803519931-Jul-1993
Columba livia/NO/1996/AY45317719961-Jul-1996
Himatione sanguinea/US-HI/1996/KC01805919961-Jul-1996
Hemignathus virens/US-HI/1998/EF56839319981-Jul-1998
Hemignathus virens/US-HI/1998/EF56839619981-Jul-1998
Serinus canaria/DE/2001/AY53030920011-Jul-2001
Loxioides bailleui/US-HI/2002/EF56838120021-Jul-2002
Himatione sanguinea/US-HI/2002/EF56839020021-Jul-2002
Corvus brachyrhynchos/US/2003/DQ13189120031-Jul-2003
Corvus brachyrhynchos/US/2003/DQ13189320031-Jul-2003
Mimus polyglottos/US/2003/DQ13189520031-Jul-2003
Carpodacus mexicanus/US/2003/DQ13189620031-Jul-2003
Cardinalis cardinalis/US/2003/DQ13189920031-Jul-2003
Himatione sanguinea/US-HI/2003/EF56837820031-Jul-2003
Corvus hawaiiensis/US-HI/2003/EF56838520031-Jul-2003
Carduelis atrata/NL/2003/KC01803820031-Jul-2003
Ardea herodias/US/2004/DQ13189820041-Jul-2004
Hemignathus virens/US-HI/2004/EF56838220041-Jul-2004
Diomedea immutabilis/US-HI/2004/EF56838320041-Jul-2004
Serinus canaria/GB/2005/AM050375<20061-Jul-2005
Serinus canaria/GB/2005/AM050384<20061-Jul-2005
Columba livia/GB/2005/AM050386<20061-Jul-2005
Passer domesticus/GB/2005/AM050390<20061-Jul-2005
Hemignathus virens/US-HI/2005/EF56840120051-Jul-2005
Turdus migratorius/US/2005/KC01806820051-Jul-2005
Anthus berthelotii/PT/2006/EU88353224-Sep-200624-Sep-2006
Cyanistes caeruleus/ES-IC/2006/EU88353310-Oct-200610-Oct-2006
Corvus corone/IT/2007/GQ180211Jun 200715-Jun-2007
Parus major/HU/2007/EF63435120071-Jul-2007
Parus major/CZ/2008/EU798995<20091-Jul-2008
Serinus canaria/CL/2008/KC01806020081-Jul-2008
Chlamydotis undulata/MA/2009/LK02165830-Jul-200930-Jul-2009
Chlamydotis macqueenii/MA/2010/LK0216536-Jul-20106-Jul-2010
Serinus canaria/IR/2010/KC19367910-Oct-201010-Oct-2010
Erithacus rubecula/ES/2011/KF38549920-Jul-201120-Jul-2011
Chlamydotis macqueenii/MA/2011/LK02165415-Oct-201115-Oct-2011
Chlamydotis macqueenii/MA/2012/LK0216551-Mar-20121-Mar-2012
Chlamydotis macqueenii/UZ/2012/LK02165710-Jun-201210-Jun-2012
Spheniscus magellanicus/BR/2012/KC5889551-Jul-20121-Jul-2012
Spheniscus magellanicus/BR/2012/KC5889561-Jul-20121-Jul-2012
Spheniscus magellanicus/BR/2012/KC5889581-Nov-20121-Nov-2012
Spheniscus magellanicus/BR/2012/KC5889591-Nov-20121-Nov-2012
Spheniscus magellanicus/BR/2012/KC5889601-Nov-20121-Nov-2012
Burhinus oedicnemus/MA/2013/LN7958835-Feb-20135-Feb-2013
Spheniscus magellanicus/BR/2013/KF51667915-Feb-201315-Feb-2013
Chlamydotis macqueenii/AE/2014/LN7958844-May-20144-May-2014
FWPVFringilla coelebs/ES/1936/HM62722519361-Jul-1936
Perdrix perdrix/IT/1978/GQ180201Dec 197815-Dec-1978
Columba livia/US/1980/KC01800119801-Jul-1980
Phoebastria immutabilis/US/1983/KC01798619831-Jul-1983
Buteo jamaicensis/US/1985/KC01800619851-Jul-1985
Phalacrocorax pelagicus/US-AK/1989/KC01798219891-Jul-1989
Cygnus buccinator/US/1989/KC01799519891-Jul-1989
Uria aalge/US/1991/KC01798519911-Jul-1991
Gallus gallus domesticus/US-HI/1993/EF56839719931-Jul-1993
Gallus gallus domesticus/US-HI/1993/EF56839819931-Jul-1993
Milvus milvus/ES/2000/KC01801020001-Jul-2000
Falco peregrinus/DE/2001/KF95600226-Feb-200126-Feb-2001
Falco/AE/2002/AY53030620021-Jul-2002
Haliaeetus albicilla/DE/2002/KF95600319-Aug-200219-Aug-2002
Otis tarda/HU/2003/KC01797020031-Jul-2003
Otis tarda/ES/2003/KC01797420031-Jul-2003
Pavo cristatus/HU/2003/KC01797520031-Jul-2003
Haliaeetus albicilla/IT/2004/AB57686120041-Jul-2004
Spilornis cheela/TW/2008/HQ44156613-Jan-200813-Jan-2008
Spilopelia senegalensis/IN/2009/HM481408Jan 200915-Jan-2009
Calypte anna/US/2009/JX41829620091-Jul-2009
Gallus gallus domesticus/CN/2010/HM623675<20111-Jul-2010
Spheniscus magellanicus/BR/2013/KC5889621-Jan-20131-Jan-2013
Anas platyrhynchos domesticus/CN/2013/KJ19218923-Dec-201323-Dec-2013
PSPV (?)Coturnix japonica/IT/1963/GQ18020019631-Jul-1963
PSPVAmazona ochrocephala/US/1980/KC01806919801-Jul-1980
Agapornis/DE/2003/AY530311<20041-Jul-2003



cnpv186CNPVSerinus canaria/GB/2005/AM071512<20061-Jul-2005
Chlamydotis undulata/MA/2009/LK02167730-Jul-200930-Jul-2009
Chlamydotis undulata/MA/2009/LN79588013-Nov-200913-Nov-2009
Chlamydotis undulata/MA/2009/LN79588114-Nov-200914-Nov-2009
Chlamydotis undulata/MA/2009/LK02168017-Nov-200917-Nov-2009
Chlamydotis undulata/MA/2010/LK02167821-Jun-201021-Jun-2010
Chlamydotis macqueenii/MA/2010/LK02167128-Jun-201028-Jun-2010
Chlamydotis undulata/MA/2010/LN7958791-Jul-20101-Jul-2010
Chlamydotis macqueenii/AE/2011/LK02166714-May-201114-May-2011
Chlamydotis undulata/MA/2011/LN79587824-Jun-201124-Jun-2011
Chlamydotis macqueenii/MA/2011/LK02167315-Oct-201115-Oct-2011
Chlamydotis macqueenii/MA/2012/LK0216741-Mar-20121-Mar-2012
Chlamydotis macqueenii/UZ/2012/LN79587710-Jun-201210-Jun-2012
Parus major/DE/2013/KF955997<20141-Jul-2013
Chlamydotis macqueenii/AE/2014/LN7958754-May-20144-May-2014
Chlamydotis macqueenii/KZ/2014/LN79587627-Jul-201427-Jul-2014
FWPV1965/LN79588219651-Jul-1965
Falco peregrinus/DE/2001/KF95599826-Feb-200126-Feb-2001
Haliaeetus albicilla/DE/2002/KF95599919-Aug-200219-Aug-2002
Grus grus/DE/2004/KF95599624-Mar-200424-Mar-2004
Pigeon/2005/AM071389<20061-Jul-2005
Meleagris gallopavo/GB/2005/AM071390<20061-Jul-2005
Gallus gallus domesticus GB/2005/AM071393<20061-Jul-2005
Gallus gallus domesticus/2005/AM071394<20061-Jul-2005
Buteo buteo/IT/2005/EF133691Sep 200515-Sep-2005
Spilopelia senegalensis/IN/2009/HM481416Jan 200915-Jan-2009
Gallus gallus domesticus/CN/2010/HM623676<20111-Jul-2010
Gallus gallus domesticus/EG/2011/JX464822Jun 201115-Jun-2011
Columba livia/ZA/2011/KJ80192020111-Jul-2011
Chlamydotis macqueenii/AE/2013/LK02168410-Feb-201310-Feb-2013
Chlamydotis macqueenii/AE/2013/LK02168331-Mar-201331-Mar-2013



DNApolCNPVUria aalge/US/1980/KC01793119801-Jul-1980
Sturnus vulgaris/US/1984/KC01795419841-Jul-1984
Leucosticte tephrocotis/US/1985/KC01795919851-Jul-1985
Junco hyemalis hyemalis/US/1986/KC01793619861-Jul-1986
Junco hyemalis hyemalis/US/1986/KC01792719861-Jul-1986
Carpodacus mexicanus/US-HI/1987/KC01787719871-Jul-1987
Quiscalus major/US/1989/KC01792219891-Jul-1989
Grus canadensis/US/1992/KC01795819921-Jul-1992
Colinus virginianus ridgwayi/US/1993/KC01794119931-Jul-1993
Pica hudsonia/US/1997/KC01795119971-Jul-1997
Corvus brachyrhynchos/US/1999/KC01795619991-Jul-1999
Corvus brachyrhynchos/US/1999/KC01794519991-Jul-1999
Circus cyaneus/ES/2000/KC01789720001-Jul-2000
Carduelis atrata/NL/2003/KC01795220031-Jul-2003
Turdus migratorius/US/2005/KC01792320051-Jul-2005
Otis tarda/HU/2005/KC01786420051-Jul-2005
Parus major/HU/2007/KC01786220071-Jul-2007
Pyrrhula pyrrhula/BE/2008/KC01795720081-Jul-2008
Camarhynchus pallidus/EC/2008/KC01794920081-Jul-2008
Mimus parvulus/EC/2008/KC01794720081-Jul-2008
Geospiza fortis/EC/2008/KC01794620081-Jul-2008
Serinus canaria/CL/2008/KC01788420081-Jul-2008
Chlamydotis undulata/MA/2009/LN79587430-Jul-200930-Jul-2009
FWPVColumba livia/US/1980/KC01792919801-Jul-1980
Haliaeetus leucocephalus/US-AK/1981/KC01790019811-Jul-1981
Phoebastria immutabilis/US/1983/KC01790419831-Jul-1983
Buteo jamaicensis/US/1985/KC01791419851-Jul-1985
1987/M3163819871-Jul-1987
Zenaida macroura/US/1987/KC01791219871-Jul-1987
Spheniscus demersus/SA/1988/KJ85967719881-Jul-1988
Cygnus buccinator/US/1989/KC01790919891-Jul-1989
Phalacrocorax pelagicus/US-AK/1989/KC01789919891-Jul-1989
Aix sponsa/US/1991/KC01791019911-Jul-1991
Uria aalge/US/1991/KC01790219911-Jul-1991
Branta canadensis/US/1992/KC01791319921-Jul-1992
Haliaeetus leucocephalus/US/1993/KC01793219931-Jul-1993
Columba livia/US-HI/1994/KC01786819941-Jul-1994
Milvus milvus/ES/2000/KC01789620001-Jul-2000
Buteo buteo/HU/2000/KC01786120001-Jul-2000
Otis tarda/ES/2003/KC01789020031-Jul-2003
Polytelis swainsonii/CL/2004/KC01788320041-Jul-2004
Falco peregrinus/HU/2005/KC01785820051-Jul-2005
Columba livia/HU/2005/KC01785620051-Jul-2005
Spheniscus magellanicus/AR/2007/KC01790520071-Jul-2007
Anas platyrhynchos domesticus/CN/2013/KM28193323-Dec-201323-Dec-2013
Domestic mallard duck/CN/2014/KM2819322-Jan-20142-Jan-2014
PSPVAmazona ochrocephala/US/1980/KC01792519801-Jul-1980

CNPV: canarypox-like viruses, FWPV: fowlpox-like viruses, PSPV: psittacinepox-like viruses, (?): non confirmed clade classification; <: before.

Avipoxvirus sequences selected for the molecular clock analyses. CNPV: canarypox-like viruses, FWPV: fowlpox-like viruses, PSPV: psittacinepox-like viruses, (?): non confirmed clade classification; <: before.

Evolutionary analyses

Phylogenies taking sampling time into account were estimated using the Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inference methods available in the BEAST package (v.1.4.8, (Drummond and Rambaut, 2007)). The analyses presented were run using the Tamura and Nei 1993 model (TN93) with gamma-distributed rate: the closest substitution model available in BEAST to the best fitting nucleotide substitution model estimated by means of hierarchical likelihood ratio approach using Mega v 6.06 (Tamura et al., 2013); and the second best nucleotide substitution model as per MrModeltest (Nylander, 2004). We used empirical base frequencies and three partitions into codon positions. Different combinations of demographic models and clock models were compared as suggested (Drummond and Rambaut, 2007): constant size or extended Bayesian skyline plot models, strict or relaxed (lognormal or exponential) clocks. At least 200 million MCMC iterations were run for each gene and each demographic model/clock model combination. Subsampling was performed every 10,000 generations to decrease autocorrelation between model parameter samples. The estimation of parameters and divergence time was carried out using Tracer (http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer). A correct mixing of MCMC was verified by effective sampling size (ESS) calculations available in Tracer. The best fitting model was also assessed using “Model Comparison” available in Tracer and choosing the lowest Akaike’s information criterion (AICM) value. The dN/dS ratios (ω) were calculated using the single-likelihood ancestor (SLAC) method available in the HyPhy package available on the http://www.datamonkey.org/ server (Kosakovsky Pond, 2005, Kosakovsky Pond and Frost, 2005).

Results

Phylogenetic trees based on three APV genes (P4b, cnpv186, and DNA polymerase) DNA sequences were constructed and all confirmed the common classification in the genus: canarypox-like viruses, fowlpox-like viruses, and psittacinepox-like viruses (Fig. 1 ). To assess both substitution rate per site per year and TMRCA, different combinations of demographic models and clock models were compared: constant size or extended Bayesian skyline plot models, strict or relaxed (lognormal or exponential) clocks. The lowest AICM values were obtained with a relaxed exponential clock and the extended Bayesian skyline plot model for both cnpv186 and the DNA polymerase genes (AICM values of 11,673.74 ± 0.11 standard error (SE) and 7,316.26 ± 0.12 SE for cnpv186 and DNA polymerase genes, respectively, Table 2 ). For the P4b gene, the AICM value was slightly lower with a strict clock and the Extended Bayesian Skyline Plot model than with a relaxed exponential clock and the extended Bayesian skyline plot model (AICM values of 8,492.42 ± 0.21 SE and 8,493.49 ± 0.44 SE, respectively). We however decided to use the same combination for our three genes for consistency: a relaxed exponential clock and the extended Bayesian skyline plot model (Table 2). Analyses were also performed using the General Time Reversible substitution model with gamma-distributed rate and invariant sites (GTR + G + I, best fitted model as per MrModeltest), which gave similar results (data not shown).
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic trees analyzing all available avipoxvirus sequences of the (A) P4b, (B) cnpv186, and (C) DNA polymerase genes. Numbers at main tree nodes represent the age of the nodes in years with their [95% HPD]. “Accession number_estimated collection date” are indicated on the tree and can be linked to full strains names on Table 1. Sub-clades as described in (Le Loc’h et al., 2014) are indicated on (A).

Table 2

Mean and 95% HPD of the Bayesian posterior estimates of substitution rate and TMRCA for avipoxviruses.

GeneClock model1Demographic model2Substitution rate (subst/site/year)Substitution rate, 95% HPDTMRCA3 (ybp)TMRCA3, 95% HPDAICM4 ± SE
P4bSCCS3.76E-052.99E-06–7.45E-0510,1332,849–34,0258,516.62 ± 0.09
EBSP1.77E-051.59E-08–3.07E-0520,2464,754–105,1178,492.42 ± 0.21
LRCCS4.16E-051.85E-06–9.05E-0511,0872,086–48,4678,540.54 ± 0.30
EBSP1.81E-053.82E-07–3.38E-0523,3823,551–110,9168,561.01 ± 0.51
ERCCS4.57E-052.27E-08–1.04E-0411,3151,761–59,7448,502.61 ± 0.28
EBSP1.83E-052.96E-084.17E-0529,2581,861197,7148,493.49 ± 0.49



cnpv186SCCS2.76E-055.99E-09–6.46E-0520,1073,705–163,81711,706.96 ± 0.07
EBSP2.69E-051.51E-10–6.53E-0522,0082,824–155,49911,698.32 ± 0.04
LRCCS5.31E-052.44E-09–1.41E-0411,446783–96,74311,680.38 ± 0.08
EBSP4.02E-053.32E-08–1.06E-0415,247841–110,87311,676.37 ± 0.07
ERCCS7.94E-054.46E-09–2.22E-047,792595–75,72111,677.74 ± 0.06
EBSP5.99E-054.85E-081.67E-0410,89196393,70711,673.74 ± 0.11



DNApolSCCS4.90E-052.93E-08–1.06E-049,9622,052–65,0737,338.44 ± 0.10
EBSP5.34E-053.64E-09–1.07E-049,3322,503–44,1107,327.55 ± 0.08
LRCCS7.12E-059.90E-08–1.69E-048,369911–58,3107,340.27 ± 0.14
EBSP6.04E-054.05E-08–1.35E-049,7111,438–59,5557,346.87 ± 0.13
ERCCS8.34E-051.48E-08–2.00E-047,331772–56,5477,323.73 ± 0.11
EBSP7.59E-052.62E-091.85E-048,68295060,7187,316.26 ± 0.12

SC: strict clock, LRC: lognormal relaxed clock, ERC: exponential relaxed clock.

CS: constant size, EBSP: extended Bayesian skyline plot.

TMRCA: time to most recent common ancestor (ybp: years before present).

AICM: Akaike’s information criterion, SE: standard error; in bold italic font: selected models.

Phylogenetic trees analyzing all available avipoxvirus sequences of the (A) P4b, (B) cnpv186, and (C) DNA polymerase genes. Numbers at main tree nodes represent the age of the nodes in years with their [95% HPD]. “Accession number_estimated collection date” are indicated on the tree and can be linked to full strains names on Table 1. Sub-clades as described in (Le Loc’h et al., 2014) are indicated on (A). Mean and 95% HPD of the Bayesian posterior estimates of substitution rate and TMRCA for avipoxviruses. SC: strict clock, LRC: lognormal relaxed clock, ERC: exponential relaxed clock. CS: constant size, EBSP: extended Bayesian skyline plot. TMRCA: time to most recent common ancestor (ybp: years before present). AICM: Akaike’s information criterion, SE: standard error; in bold italic font: selected models. Our molecular clock analyses showed that APV diverged from a common ancestor approximately 10–30 thousand years ago: 8,682 (95% Highest Posterior Density (HPD): 950–60,718), 10,891 (95% HPD: 963–93,707), and 29,259 (95% HPD: 1871–197,714) years ago for DNA polymerase, cnpv186, and P4b, respectively (Fig. 1). Interestingly, fowlpox-like and psittacinepox-like viruses shared a more recent common ancestor than canarypox-like viruses: they diverged 5–16 thousand years ago (5,034 (95% HPD: 625–34,636) years ago for DNA polymerase, 16,012 (95% HPD: 1208–117,230) years ago for P4b, no psittacinepox-like viruses sequence are available for cnpv186, Fig. 1). When considering APV collected the same year in the same location such as Chlamydotis undulata/MA/2009/LK021680, C. undulata/MA/2009/LN795880, and C. undulata/MA/2009/LN795881, all three isolated from houbara bustards in Morocco in 2009, the cnpv186 phylogeny and molecular clock analysis (Fig. 1B) enabled to conclude to clear independent introductions of viruses and rule out the hypothesis of virus spread and evolution within the site. C. undulata/MA/2009/LN795881 interestingly clustered in sub-clade B2 (sequence identical to C. undulata/MA/2011/LK021679 described in (Le Loc’h et al., 2014)) whereas C. undulata/MA/2009/LN795880 (sequence identical to C. undulata/MA/2011/LK021670 described in (Le Loc’h et al., 2014)) and C. undulata/MA/2009/LK021680 clustered in a distinct sub-clade (B1). The two sub-clades showed a divergence 3,455 (95% HPD: 222–27,041) years ago which is not compatible with an on-site evolution of the virus. Selection pressure analyses showed that P4b, cnpv186 and DNA polymerase genes were under purifying selection with ω (dN/dS) values of 0.067 (with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.057–0.078), 0.200 (95% CI: 0.183–0.219), and 0.065 (95% CI: 0.055–0.076) for P4b, cnpv186 and DNA polymerase genes, respectively. No positively selected site was found in any of the three genes studied.

Discussion

The present study aimed at assessing the substitution rate of APV and at estimating their TMRCA. We compared several clock and demographic models available in the BEAST package and found that APV evolved at a rate of 2–8 × 10−5  substitution/site/year. The date of mean time of divergence of APV from a common ancestor was extrapolated to be about 10,000–30,000 years ago. We observed a threefold difference between substitution rates and TMRCA of P4b on the one hand and cnpv186 and DNA polymerase on the other hand (Table 2). DNA polymerase encodes a polymerase protein, cnpv186 an immunodominant protein, and P4b a core protein (Tulman et al., 2004). The slower evolution rate of P4b is therefore somewhat surprising: while viable DNA polymerase and cnpv186 mutants may be more difficult to generate, one could expect more flexibility on a core protein. The selection pressure may however be lower on P4b than on its counterparts. Esposito et al. showed that the genes coding for host range and virulence proteins vary the most for Smallpox Virus compared to genes involved in virus replication, suggesting that these genes are most targeted by selection pressure (Esposito, 2006). But the large confidence intervals (95% HPD) associated with the values we found (within the range of what had been calculated in previous studies) does not show a statistically significant difference (Table 2). Therefore, it is not possible to draw any conclusion. In addition, our analysis has a bias as it was carried out on three genes only: a very small fragment of avipoxvirus genomes (260–306 kbp). Cnpv186, P4b and DNA polymerase genes were selected on the basis of available sequence data but might have a substitution rate different from the rest of the avipoxvirus genome. The molecular clock analyses of avipoxviruses will gain in precision when more sequence data (and more full genomes) become available. To run the analyses with as much data as possible, we extrapolated sampling years for some sequences. This also represents a bias. When excluding the sequence data for which no collection year was available, the substitution rates and TMRCA results for P4b and DNA polymerase genes were almost unchanged, but cnpv186 gene had a tenfold lower calculated substitution rate and a TMRCA of 2,274 years only. McLysaght et al. (2003) tested poxvirus genes for selection acting on the evolution of genes by looking at synonymous and nonsynonymous mutations. They observed positive selection for genes involved in virulence or for gene candidates for host–pathogen interaction (McLysaght et al., 2003). Indeed, positive selection of viruses could also contribute to an increase of substitution rate, which can be observed either for viruses inducing a strong host immune response or for those which have been the object of vaccination or intervention campaigns (Firth et al., 2010). While the houbara bustards we focus on in our projects in Morocco, the United Arab Emirates, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan are vaccinated annually (Le Loc’h et al., 2015), APV vaccination is not systematic worldwide, thus making selection pressure assessment difficult. Our selection pressure analyses demonstrated a purifying selection of the three APV genes we studied with ω values ranging between 0.065 and 0.200, suggesting that a non-synonymous mutation has only 7–20% as much chance as a synonymous mutation of being fixed in the population. This finding might correlate with relatively weak vaccination/intervention pressure and may be linked with the low host specificity of avipoxviruses. Vaccination is likely not the sole factor driving potential selection pressure and ecological and epidemiological factors should be further investigated for a proper understanding of the observed selection phenomenon. Li et al. (2007) worked on Smallpox Virus evolution and linked sequence data and the first description of smallpox in humans (4th century AD in China; suspicions of smallpox as early as 1122 BC). Their dating was based on time-structured sequence data (207–231 years before present (ybp) using strict and relaxed clocks, respectively; these values were discarded for obvious discrepancy with historical and epidemiological data), or with calibration with historical records of smallpox infection (1400–6300 ybp) (Li et al., 2007). However, the latter method proved erroneous as epidemiological records may not correlate with real origin of a pathogen (Hughes et al., 2010, Shchelkunov, 2009). The absence of ancient epidemiological data on APV prevented us from including any historical calibration in our analyses. Several research teams have in the past warned evolutionary biologists studying DNA viruses about the biases associated with the use of heterochronous phylogenetic modeling designed for faster evolving RNA pathogens (Firth et al., 2010). In addition, it was shown that molecular evolution is artificially accelerated on short timescales (Ho et al., 2007). Indeed our datasets contain very recent sequences only (from 1865 to now) compared to the TMCRA of APV. Hence our results should be considered with caution. But Babkin and Shchelkunov estimated that Poxviridae evolve at a rate of 0.9–1.2 × 10–6  substitutions/site/year. They calculated the ancestors of poxviruses, orthopoxviruses, and modern poxvirus species dated approximately 500,000, 300,000, and 14,000 years, respectively (Babkin and Shchelkunov, 2006). The evolution rate of APV estimated in the present study is therefore within the range of what was observed for poxviruses. The divergence between APV clades (canarypox-like viruses, fowlpox-like viruses, and psittacinepox-like viruses) is as old as the divergence among modern poxvirus species. Our results therefore suggest that APV may keep their “Genus” classification and not become a sub-family as proposed in the past (Jarmin et al., 2006), even if taxonomic classifications could not be based solely on the time of divergence. In addition, when Firth et al. tried to account for the specificity of double stranded DNA genomes in evolution calculations, their most robust virus model (with the different clock and demographic models tested) was Variola virus, suggesting that heterochronous phylogenetic modeling may be used for poxviruses evolution calculations (Firth et al., 2010). They however emphasized that the TMRCA calculated for Variola virus based on the high substitution rates observed were likely erroneous. Our TMRCA values should really be considered as first estimates and not overinterpretated. In conclusion, the present study based on three genes showed that APV evolve at a rate of 2–8 × 10−5  substitution/site/year and that the date of mean time of divergence of APV from a common ancestor is about 10,000–30,000 years ago. This new finding should facilitate future epidemiological investigations on virus spread, origin and circulation.

Author contributions

G.L.L., M.F.D. and S.B. designed the study and drafted the manuscript. G.L.L. and M.F.D. performed and interpreted the analyses.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
  26 in total

1.  Datamonkey: rapid detection of selective pressure on individual sites of codon alignments.

Authors:  Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Simon D W Frost
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-02-15       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0.

Authors:  M A Larkin; G Blackshields; N P Brown; R Chenna; P A McGettigan; H McWilliam; F Valentin; I M Wallace; A Wilm; R Lopez; J D Thompson; T J Gibson; D G Higgins
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Genome variation of human papillomavirus types: phylogenetic and medical implications.

Authors:  Hans-Ulrich Bernard; Itzel E Calleja-Macias; S Terence Dunn
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Outbreaks of Pox Disease Due to Canarypox-Like and Fowlpox-Like Viruses in Large-Scale Houbara Bustard Captive-Breeding Programmes, in Morocco and the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  G Le Loc'h; M C Paul; C Camus-Bouclainville; S Bertagnoli
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.005

Review 5.  The evolutionary biology of poxviruses.

Authors:  Austin L Hughes; Stephanie Irausquin; Robert Friedman
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 6.  How long ago did smallpox virus emerge?

Authors:  Sergei N Shchelkunov
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 2.574

Review 7.  Poxviruses and the evolution of host range and virulence.

Authors:  Sherry L Haller; Chen Peng; Grant McFadden; Stefan Rothenburg
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.342

8.  Using time-structured data to estimate evolutionary rates of double-stranded DNA viruses.

Authors:  Cadhla Firth; Andrew Kitchen; Beth Shapiro; Marc A Suchard; Edward C Holmes; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees.

Authors:  Alexei J Drummond; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  The complete genome sequences of poxviruses isolated from a penguin and a pigeon in South Africa and comparison to other sequenced avipoxviruses.

Authors:  Kristy Offerman; Olivia Carulei; Anelda Philine van der Walt; Nicola Douglass; Anna-Lise Williamson
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparative analysis estimates the relative frequencies of co-divergence and cross-species transmission within viral families.

Authors:  Jemma L Geoghegan; Sebastián Duchêne; Edward C Holmes
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 6.823

2.  Recombination drives the emergence of orf virus diversity: evidence from the first complete genome sequence of an Indian orf virus isolate and comparative genomic analysis.

Authors:  Basanta Pravas Sahu; Prativa Majee; Ravi Raj Singh; Niranjana Sahoo; Debasis Nayak
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 2.685

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.