Literature DB >> 26231197

Effect of Arthroscopic Evaluation of Acute Ankle Fractures on PROMIS Intermediate-Term Functional Outcomes.

Daniel J Fuchs1, Bryant S Ho2, Mark W LaBelle2, Armen S Kelikian3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Following open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of unstable ankle fractures, some patients have persistent pain and poor outcomes. This may be secondary to intra-articular injuries that occur at the time of fracture, which occur in up to 88% of fractures. Ankle arthroscopy at the time of ORIF has been proposed to address these intra-articular injuries. This study compared patient-reported functional outcomes in patients who underwent ankle ORIF with and without ankle arthroscopy.
METHODS: An institutional database was used to retrospectively identify 93 patients who underwent ORIF for an unstable ankle fracture with an intact medial malleolus between 2002 and 2013. Forty-two patients had ankle arthroscopy at the time of ORIF and 51 did not. Functional outcomes between groups were compared using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function and pain interference computerized adaptive tests at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Outcomes were also measured with the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and the Olerud and Molander ankle fracture outcome scale. Average patient follow-up was 67 months (n = 51).
RESULTS: PROMIS physical function and pain interference scores were not significantly different between groups (physical function, 57.8 vs. 54.5, P = .23; pain interference, 45.6 vs. 46.9, P = .56). Operative time was increased in the arthroscopy group (74 minutes vs. 59 minutes, P = .027). Overall, 60% (25/42) had chondral lesions of the talus, 7% (3/42) had chondral lesions of the tibial plafond, and 21% (9/42) had loose bodies requiring removal. There was no significant difference in complication rates between groups.
CONCLUSION: At intermediate-term follow-up of patients with unstable ankle fractures and intact medial malleoli, functional outcomes were not significantly improved in patients who underwent ankle arthroscopy. However, there were no increased complications attributable to ankle arthroscopy, and average total operative time was increased by only 15 minutes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle arthroscopy; ankle fracture; articular chondral lesion; patient reported functional outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26231197     DOI: 10.1177/1071100715597657

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  13 in total

1.  Computerized Adaptive Testing for Patient Reported Outcomes in Ankle Fracture Surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Gausden; Ashley Levack; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Danielle Sin; David S Wellman; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  Utilization of Arthroscopy During Ankle Fracture Fixation Among Early Career Surgeons: An Evaluation of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Oral Examination Database.

Authors:  Alan G Shamrock; Zain M Khazi; Christopher N Carender; Annunziato Amendola; Natalie Glass; Kyle R Duchman
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

3.  Arthroscopically Assisted Open Reduction-Internal Fixation of Ankle Fractures: Significance of the Arthroscopic Ankle Drive-through Sign.

Authors:  William W Schairer; Benedict U Nwachukwu; David M Dare; Mark C Drakos
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-04-25

4.  Prevalence and associated factors of intra-articular lesions in acute ankle fractures evaluated by arthroscopy and clinical outcomes with minimum 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Xing-Zuo Chen; Ying Chen; Qian-Zheng Zhu; Li-Qiang Wang; Xiao-Dong Xu; Peng Lin
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Reporting and utilization of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System® (PROMIS®) measures in orthopedic research and practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maggie E Horn; Emily K Reinke; Logan J Couce; Bryce B Reeve; Leila Ledbetter; Steven Z George
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Arthroscopically Assisted Ankle Facture Treatment Versus Conventional Treatment.

Authors:  Sebastian F Baumbach; Marcel Urresti-Gundlach; Mareen Braunstein; Lars Borgmann; Wolfgang Böcker; J Turner Vosseller; Hans Polzer
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 7.  Arthroscopically Assisted Internal Fixation of Foot and Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caroline E Williams; Peter Joo; Irvin Oh; Christopher Miller; John Y Kwon
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2021-01-21

8.  Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Major Pathologies of the Forefoot, Midfoot, Hindfoot, and Achilles Using PROMIS.

Authors:  Daniel A Hu; Rusheel Nayak; Elijah O Ogunkoya; Milap S Patel; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2020-11-06

9.  Incidence of concomitant chondral/osteochondral lesions in acute ankle fractures and their effect on clinical outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ali Darwich; Julia Adam; Franz-Joseph Dally; Svetlana Hetjens; Ahmed Jawhar
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.067

10.  High incidence of (osteo)chondral lesions in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Hugo A Martijn; Kaj T A Lambers; Jari Dahmen; Sjoerd A S Stufkens; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.