Literature DB >> 26230039

Change in calculated cardiovascular risk due to guideline revision: A cross-sectional study in the Netherlands.

Clare H Luymes1, Wouter de Ruijter1, Rosalinde Ke Poortvliet1, Hein Putter2, Huug J van Duijn3, Mattijs E Numans1, Yvonne M Drewes1, Jeanet W Blom1, Willem Jj Assendelft1,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines and accompanying risk charts concerning cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) are regularly revised worldwide.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether revision of the Dutch CVRM guideline has led to the reclassification of patients and, accordingly, to changes in drug recommendations.
METHODS: All medical records (year 2011) of patients aged 40-65 years with no history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) but using antihypertensive and/or lipid-lowering drugs, were selected from the Registration Network of General Practices associated with Leiden University Medical Center. Multiple imputation techniques for missing determinants were used. The individual cardiovascular risk was calculated and the resulting drug recommendation was assessed according to both the 2006 and 2012 versions of the guideline.
RESULTS: In total, 2075 patients were selected, of whom 1248 fulfilled the guideline criteria (systolic blood pressure 115-180 mmHg and total cholesterol/high-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol ratio 3.5-8). According to the 2012 guideline, 58.2% of the patients had low risk and 249 patients (20.0%) shifted to a different risk category. For 150 of these patients (12.0%), this category shift implied a shift in drug recommendation. The probability of shifting in drug recommendation increased with increasing age, cholesterol level, and blood pressure, and by being male.
CONCLUSION: Guideline revision may have important implications: based on identical values for risk factors, according to the latest revision of the Dutch CVRM guideline 20% of patients shifted in risk category and 12% of the patients shifted in drug recommendation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular diseases; guidelines as topic; preventive medicine; primary prevention; risk assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26230039     DOI: 10.3109/13814788.2015.1064389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract        ISSN: 1381-4788            Impact factor:   1.904


  3 in total

1.  Deprescribing preventive cardiovascular medication in patients with predicted low cardiovascular disease risk in general practice - the ECSTATIC study: a cluster randomised non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Clare H Luymes; Rosalinde K E Poortvliet; Nan van Geloven; Margot W M de Waal; Yvonne M Drewes; Jeanet W Blom; Nynke Smidt; Willem J J Assendelft; Wilbert B van den Hout; Wouter de Ruijter; Mattijs E Numans
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Understanding deprescribing of preventive cardiovascular medication: a Q-methodology study in patients.

Authors:  Clare H Luymes; Nelleke J Boelhouwer; Rosalinde Ke Poortvliet; Wouter de Ruijter; Ria Reis; Mattijs E Numans
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.711

3.  Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Additional Risk Minimization Measure to Reduce the Risk of Prescribing Mirabegron to Patients with Severe Uncontrolled Hypertension in Four European Countries.

Authors:  Edith M Heintjes; Irene D Bezemer; Daniel Prieto-Alhambra; Elisabeth Smits; Helen P Booth; Daniel Dedman; Ying He; Fabian Hoti; Minna Vehkala; Stefan de Vogel; Noah Jamie Robinson; Kwame Appenteng; Fernie J A Penning-van Beest
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.790

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.