| Literature DB >> 26229845 |
Renato Cavanus Pagani1, Rodrigo Ernesto Kunz2, Ricardo Girardi2, Marcelo Guerra3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare the body mass index (BMI) of patients with fractures in the proximal extremity of the femur with the BMI of patients without any previous history of fractures.Entities:
Keywords: Body mass index; Elderly person; Hip fracture
Year: 2014 PMID: 26229845 PMCID: PMC4487452 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.09.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Description of the sample investigated according to the variables of age and sex for the groups with fractures (n = 75) and without fractures (n = 89).
| Variable | Category | Group (%) | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With fractures | Without fractures | ||||
| Sex | Female | 74.7 | 62.9 | 68.3 | 0.107 |
| Male | 25.3 | 37.1 | 31.7 | ||
| Age | Up to 70 years | 17.3 | 14.6 | 15.9 | 0.864 |
| From 71 to 80 years | 45.3 | 44.9 | 45.1 | ||
| Over 80 years | 37.3 | 40.4 | 39.0 | ||
p value (significance level). For associations to be considered significant, the p value needed to be a maximum of 5% (p ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 1Description of the sample investigated according to the variables of age and sex for the groups with fractures (n = 75 cases) and without fractures (n = 89 cases).
Comparison of the means for the quantitative variables of age, height and weight between the study groups.
| Variable | Group | Mean | Standard deviation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | With fractures | 75 | 77.6 | 7.6 | 0.491 (NS) |
| Without fractures | 89 | 78.4 | 7.3 | ||
| Height | With fractures | 75 | 1.62 | 0.11 | 0.000 |
| Without fractures | 89 | 1.54 | 0.09 | ||
| Weight | With fractures | 75 | 59.7 | 13.2 | 0.784 (NS) |
| Without fractures | 89 | 60.3 | 13.5 | ||
| BMI | With fractures | 75 | 22.6 | 3.9 | 0.000 |
| Without fractures | 89 | 25.5 | 5.3 | ||
NS, not significant.
Significant at the significance level of p ≤ 0.0001.
Description of the sample investigated according to the variable of BMI classification for the groups with fractures (n = 75) and without fractures (n = 89).
| BMI classification | Group (%) | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| With fractures | Without fractures | |||
| Low weight | 12.0 | 5.6 | 8.5 | 0.003 |
| Normal weight | 62.7 | 43.8 | 52.4 | |
| Overweight | 24.0 | 33.7 | 29.3 | |
| Obese | 1.3 | 16.9 | 9.8 | |
Significant at the significance level of p ≤ 0.01. To perform the test on the BMI variable, the categories of overweight and obesity were grouped.
Fig. 2Description of the sample investigated according to the variable of BMI classification for the groups with fractures (n = 75 cases) and without fractures (n = 89 cases).
Comparison of sex, BMI and age in relation to the types of fracture that occurred, for the group with fractures alone (n = 75).
| Variable | Category | Type of fracture | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Femoral neck | Subtrochanteric | Trochanteric | |||
| Sex | Female | 70.4 | 100.0 | 76.6 | 0.693 |
| Male | 29.6 | 23.4 | |||
| Age | Up to 70 years | 33.3 | 8.5 | 0.010 | |
| From 71 to 80 years | 48.1 | 44.7 | |||
| Over 80 years | 18.5 | 100.0 | 46.8 | ||
| BMI classification | Low weight | 14.8 | 10.6 | 0.256 | |
| Normal weight | 70.4 | 59.6 | |||
| Overweight/obese | 14.8 | 100.0 | 29.8 | ||
NS, not significant.
Significant at the significance level of p ≤ 0.01.
To perform the test on the BMI variable, the categories of overweight and obesity were grouped.
Fig. 3Comparison of sex, BMI and age in relation to the types of fracture that occurred, for the group with fractures alone (n = 75 cases).