| Literature DB >> 26229809 |
Osmar Valadão Lopes Júnior1, Paulo Renato Saggin1, Gilberto Matos do Nascimento1, André Kuhn1, José Saggin1, André Manoel Inácio1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to evaluate a series of skeletally immature patients who underwent three surgical techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction according to each patient's growth potential.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament; Orthopedic procedures; Reconstruction
Year: 2014 PMID: 26229809 PMCID: PMC4511573 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.04.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Fig. 1Protocol for choosing the surgical technique, according to age and Tanner's sexual maturity score.
Demographic data.
| Technique | Patient | Age (years) | Sex | Side | Tanner | Length of time with injury (months) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP | 1 | 9 | M | R | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | 7 | M | R | 1 | 3 | |
| 3 | 11 | M | L | 2 | 4 | |
| 4 | 10 | M | L | 2 | 3 | |
| PTP | 5 | 12 | M | R | 3 | 3 |
| 6 | 12 | M | R | 3 | 4 | |
| 7 | 12 | M | R | 3 | 3 | |
| 8 | 12 | M | L | 3 | 2 | |
| 9 | 12 | M | R | 3 | 2 | |
| 10 | 12 | M | L | 3 | 6 | |
| 11 | 12 | F | L | 3 | 4 | |
| TP | 12 | 14 | M | R | 4 | 5 |
| 13 | 14 | M | R | 4 | 3 | |
| 14 | 13 | F | R | 4 | 12 | |
| 15 | 13 | M | L | 4 | 4 | |
| 16 | 15 | F | R | 4 | 4 | |
| 17 | 13 | M | R | 4 | 2 | |
| 18 | 13 | M | L | 4 | 7 | |
| 19 | 14 | M | R | 4 | 12 | |
| 20 | 13 | M | L | 4 | 6 | |
| 21 | 14 | M | R | 4 | 10 | |
| 22 | 14 | F | L | 4 | 5 | |
| 23 | 13 | M | R | 4 | 5 | |
EP, extraphyseal reconstruction of the ACL; PTP, partial transphyseal reconstruction of the ACL; TP, total transphyseal reconstruction of the ACL.
Time elapsed from the injury to the surgery.
Fig. 2Illustration demonstrating the transphyseal (TP) technique for ACL reconstruction.
Fig. 3Illustration demonstrating the partial transphyseal (PTP) technique for ACL reconstruction.
Fig. 4Anteroposterior (A) and lateral (B) X-rays on a 12-year-old patient with Tanner 3 who underwent ACL reconstruction using the PTP technique. Note the verticalized and centralized tibial tunnel.
Fig. 5Fluoroscopy showing the position of the guidewire for the extraphyseal (EP) tibial tunnel.
Fig. 6Illustration demonstrating the extraphyseal technique (EP).
Fig. 7X-ray (A) and MRI (B) of a nine-year-old patient with Tanner 1 who underwent EP reconstruction one year earlier.
Clinical results, evaluated using the Lysholm score, associated injuries and treatment.
| Technique | Patients | Pre-op Lysholm | Post-op Lysholm | Follow-up (months) | Associated injury |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EP | 1 | 65 | 98 | 48 | None |
| 2 | 50 | 100 | 19 | MM-suture | |
| 3 | 63 | 93 | 64 | None | |
| 4 | 67 | 95 | 30 | None | |
| PTP | 5 | 48 | 98 | 58 | LM-conserv. |
| 6 | 78 | 100 | 35 | None | |
| 7 | 58 | 98 | 16 | None | |
| 8 | 80 | 98 | 37 | None | |
| 9 | 50 | 98 | 32 | None | |
| 10 | 53 | 100 | 18 | None | |
| 11 | 58 | 95 | 64 | LM-conserv. | |
| TP | 12 | 48 | 93 | 42 | MM-conserv. |
| 13 | 52 | 95 | 24 | MM-suture | |
| 14 | 58 | 95 | 41 | MM-meniscectomy | |
| 15 | 78 | 93 | 18 | None | |
| 16 | 62 | 95 | 42 | MCL-conserv. | |
| 17 | 80 | 95 | 33 | MCL-repair | |
| 18 | 68 | 98 | 21 | MM-meniscectomy | |
| 19 | 57 | 98 | 56 | MM-meniscectomy | |
| 20 | 80 | 93 | 36 | LM-meniscectomy | |
| 21 | 52 | 100 | 18 | MM-meniscectomy | |
| 22 | 75 | 93 | 18 | LM-meniscectomy | |
| 23 | 73 | 95 | 45 | MM-conserv. | |
Preoperative Lysholm score.
Postoperative Lysholm score.
Associated injuries: MM, medial meniscal injury; LM, lateral meniscal injury; MCL, medial collateral ligament injury.
Treatments performed on the associated injury: conservative treatment (conserv.); meniscectomy; meniscal suture; repair on MCL.