Literature DB >> 26229304

Application of a scoring instrument to predict intracerebral hemorrhage and outcome after thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

Rolla T Sweis1, Yaniv Kerem2, Simon Waghchoure3, Erik B Kulstad4, Melvin D Wichter5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26229304      PMCID: PMC4520034          DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.160743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock        ISSN: 0974-2700


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Despite risk of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), thrombolytic therapy may improve patient outcomes in acute ischemic stroke.[14] We sought to determine if the hemorrhage after thrombolysis (HAT) score, a five-point scale used to predict risk of HAT, might be a useful decision-making tool in the community hospital setting [Table 1]. We reviewed all 39 patients who presented to our emergency department between March 2006 and October 2008 and received thrombolytics for acute stroke. Outcomes were determined by review of medical records and telephone contact with patients or family members. Outcome measures were ICH, mortality and mRS <2. The median age of patients was 72 (IQR 56-80), and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 11 (IQR 6-17), of which 64% were female. Twelve patients (31%, 95%CI: 16-46%) developed ICH (mean NIHSS = 15). Six patients (15%, 95%CI: 4-27%) died (mean NIHSS = 19). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) measuring the ability of the HAT score to predict ICH was 0.66 (95%CI: 0.47-0.84). The AUC to predict mortality was 0.67 (95%CI: 0.43-0.91) and to predict favorable outcome after stroke (mRS <2) was 0.77 (95%CI: 0.62-0.91) [Figure 1]. Despite data being retrospectively gathered from a single hospital emergency department, valuable information was nonetheless observed. The HAT score performed marginally well in predicting a favorable outcome after acute ischemic stroke, perhaps providing an additional risk stratification tool when considering thrombolytic therapy.[235]
Table 1

Hemorrhage after thrombolysis score scale

Figure 1

Area under receiver operating characteristic curve for favorable outcome (mRS <2)

Hemorrhage after thrombolysis score scale Area under receiver operating characteristic curve for favorable outcome (mRS <2)
  5 in total

1.  Survey of emergency physicians about recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Devin L Brown; William G Barsan; Lynda D Lisabeth; Michael E Gallery; Lewis B Morgenstern
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.721

2.  Predicting outcome of IV thrombolysis-treated ischemic stroke patients: the DRAGON score.

Authors:  D Strbian; A Meretoja; F J Ahlhelm; J Pitkäniemi; P Lyrer; M Kaste; S Engelter; T Tatlisumak
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  The stroke-thrombolytic predictive instrument: a predictive instrument for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  David M Kent; Harry P Selker; Robin Ruthazer; Erich Bluhmki; Werner Hacke
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  The HAT Score: a simple grading scale for predicting hemorrhage after thrombolysis.

Authors:  M Lou; A Safdar; M Mehdiratta; S Kumar; G Schlaug; L Caplan; D Searls; M Selim
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Provider perceptions of barriers to the emergency use of tPA for acute ischemic stroke: a qualitative study.

Authors:  William J Meurer; Jennifer J Majersik; Shirley M Frederiksen; Allison M Kade; Annette M Sandretto; Phillip A Scott
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2011-05-06
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Neuroprotection of Botch in experimental intracerebral hemorrhage in rats.

Authors:  Binbin Mei; Haiying Li; Juehua Zhu; Junjie Yang; Ziying Yang; Zunjia Wen; Xiang Li; Haitao Shen; Meifen Shen; Gang Chen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-24

2.  The impact of neuronal Notch-1/JNK pathway on intracerebral hemorrhage-induced neuronal injury of rat model.

Authors:  Maohua Chen; Jun Sun; Chuan Lu; Xiandong Chen; Huajun Ba; Qun Lin; Jianyong Cai; Junxia Dai
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.