Literature DB >> 26228974

Types of approximation for probabilistic cognition: Sampling and variational.

Adam N Sanborn1.   

Abstract

A basic challenge for probabilistic models of cognition is explaining how probabilistically correct solutions are approximated by the limited brain, and how to explain mismatches with human behavior. An emerging approach to solving this problem is to use the same approximation algorithms that were been developed in computer science and statistics for working with complex probabilistic models. Two types of approximation algorithms have been used for this purpose: sampling algorithms, such as importance sampling and Markov chain Monte Carlo, and variational algorithms, such as mean-field approximations and assumed density filtering. Here I briefly review this work, outlining how the algorithms work, how they can explain behavioral biases, and how they might be implemented in the brain. There are characteristic differences between how these two types of approximation are applied in brain and behavior, which points to how they could be combined in future research.
Copyright © 2015 The Author. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Probabilistic cognition; Rational process models; Sampling; Variational approximations

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26228974     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  5 in total

1.  Task-induced neural covariability as a signature of approximate Bayesian learning and inference.

Authors:  Richard D Lange; Ralf M Haefner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Interoception as modeling, allostasis as control.

Authors:  Eli Sennesh; Jordan Theriault; Dana Brooks; Jan-Willem van de Meent; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Karen S Quigley
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.111

3.  Fictional narrative as a variational Bayesian method for estimating social dispositions in large groups.

Authors:  James Carney; Cole Robertson; Tamás Dávid-Barrett
Journal:  J Math Psychol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.223

4.  A confirmation bias in perceptual decision-making due to hierarchical approximate inference.

Authors:  Richard D Lange; Ankani Chattoraj; Jeffrey M Beck; Jacob L Yates; Ralf M Haefner
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  The Bayesian sampler: Generic Bayesian inference causes incoherence in human probability judgments.

Authors:  Jian-Qiao Zhu; Adam N Sanborn; Nick Chater
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 8.934

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.