Literature DB >> 26228413

Testing the PROMIS® Depression measures for monitoring depression in a clinical sample outside the US.

G Vilagut1, C G Forero2, N D Adroher3, E Olariu4, D Cella5, J Alonso6.   

Abstract

The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) was devised to facilitate assessment of patient self-reported health status, taking advantage of Item Response Theory. We aimed to assess measurement properties of the PROMIS Depression item bank and an 8-item static short form in a Spanish clinical sample. A three-month follow-up study of patients with active mood/anxiety symptoms (n = 218) was carried out. We assessed model unidimensionality (Confirmatory Item Factor Analysis), reliability (internal consistency and Item Information Curves), and validity (convergent-discriminant with correlations; known-groups with comparison of means and effect sizes; and criterion validity with Receiver operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis). We also assessed 3-month responsiveness to change (Cohen's effect sizes (d) in stable and recovered patients). The unidimensional model showed adequate fit (CFI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.08). Information Curves had reliabilities over 0.90 throughout most of the score continuum. As expected, we observed high correlations with external self-reported depression, and moderate with self-reported anxiety and clinical measures. The item bank showed an increasing severity gradient from no disorder (mean = 48, SE = 0.6) to depression with comorbid anxiety (mean = 55.8, SE = 0.4). PROMIS detected depression disorder with great accuracy according to the area under the curve (AUC = 0.89). Both formats, item bank and short form, were highly responsive to change in recovered patients (d > 0.7) and had small changes in stable patients (d < 0.2). The good metric properties of the Spanish PROMIS Depression measures provide further evidence of their adequacy for monitoring depression levels of patients in clinical settings. This double check of quality (within countries and populations) supports the ability of PROMIS measures for guaranteeing fair comparisons across languages and countries in specific clinical populations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computerized adaptive testing; Major depression; Mental health; Patient reported outcomes; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26228413     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  12 in total

1.  Mindfulness Training Enhances Self-Regulation and Facilitates Health Behavior Change for Primary Care Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Richa Gawande; My Ngoc To; Elizabeth Pine; Todd Griswold; Timothy B Creedon; Alexandra Brunel; Angela Lozada; Eric B Loucks; Zev Schuman-Olivier
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Validation of the Computerized Adaptive Test for Mental Health in Primary Care.

Authors:  Andrea K Graham; Alexa Minc; Erin Staab; David G Beiser; Robert D Gibbons; Neda Laiteerapong
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Predictors of Upper-Extremity Physical Function in Older Adults.

Authors:  Hugo H Hermanussen; Mariano E Menendez; Neal C Chen; David Ring; Ana-Maria Vranceanu
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-10

4.  Screening young adult cancer survivors with the PROMIS Depression Short Form (PROMIS-D-SF): Comparison with a structured clinical diagnostic interview.

Authors:  Christopher J Recklitis; Jaime E Blackmon; Grace Chang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Minimally important differences and severity thresholds are estimated for the PROMIS depression scales from three randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Timothy E Stump; Chen X Chen; Jacob Kean; Matthew J Bair; Teresa M Damush; Erin E Krebs; Patrick O Monahan
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 6.  All metrics are equal, but some metrics are more equal than others: A systematic search and review on the use of the term 'metric'.

Authors:  Núria Duran Adroher; Birgit Prodinger; Carolina Saskia Fellinghauer; Alan Tennant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Responsiveness of PROMIS and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) Depression Scales in three clinical trials.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Timothy E Stump; Chen X Chen; Jacob Kean; Teresa M Damush; Matthew J Bair; Erin E Krebs; Patrick O Monahan
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Insurance-Reimbursable Mindfulness for Safety-Net Primary Care Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Richa Gawande; Elizabeth Pine; Todd Griswold; Timothy Creedon; Zayda Vallejo; Elana Rosenbaum; Angela Lozada; Zev Schuman-Olivier
Journal:  Mindfulness (N Y)       Date:  2019-03-18

9.  Stopping Rules for Computer Adaptive Testing When Item Banks Have Nonuniform Information.

Authors:  Scott B Morris; Michael Bass; Elizabeth Howard; Richard E Neapolitan
Journal:  Int J Test       Date:  2019-07-16

10.  Measurement properties of depression questionnaires in patients with diabetes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Susan E M van Dijk; Marcel C Adriaanse; Lennart van der Zwaan; Judith E Bosmans; Harm W J van Marwijk; Maurits W van Tulder; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.