| Literature DB >> 26228224 |
Meng Ye, Bai-Gen Zhang, Lan Zhang, Hui Xie, Hao Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence indicates a potential role of adventitial vasa vasorum (VV) dysfunction in the pathophysiology of restenosis. However, characterization of VV vascularization in restenotic arteries with primary lesions is still missing. In this study, we quantitatively evaluated the response of adventitial VV to vascular injury resulting from balloon angioplasty in diseased arteries.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26228224 PMCID: PMC4717968 DOI: 10.4103/0366-6999.161380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med J (Engl) ISSN: 0366-6999 Impact factor: 2.628
Figure 1Top: Representative three-dimensional micro-computed tomography (CT) images of carotid arteries from the sham operation group (a), primary injury group (b), and angioplasty group (c). A denser plexus of microvessels in the adventitia was shown in the angioplasty group. Bottom: Representative cross-sectional micro-CT images of carotid artery from the sham operation group (d), primary injury (e) group and angioplasty group (f). Two anatomically different vasa vasorum (VV) types are identified: First-order VV (arrows) and second-order VV (arrowheads).
Quantitative computerized digital analyses of micro-CT images
| Items | Sham group ( | Single injury ( | Angioplasty ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VV Number ( | 5.833 ± 0.477 | 7.429 ± 0.841 | 14.4 ± 1.176*† | 21.374 | 0.000 |
| VV density ( | 1.295 ± 0.110 | 0.927 ± 0.165* | 0.857 ± 0.063* | 4.074 | 0.033 |
| Ratio 2nd/1st order VV | 1.325 ± 0.371 | 1.784 ± 0.139 | 2.440 ± 0.214* | 5.451 | 0.013 |
| Volvv/Voltotal | 0.176 ± 0.055 | 0.118 ± 0.035 | 0.326 ± 0.087† | 2.728 | 0.094 |
| VV endothelial surface fraction (VV endothelial | 2.996 ± 0.689 | 2.794 ± 0.333 | 5.450 ± 0.799*† | 5.424 | 0.015 |
| surface areas/vessel wall volume mm2/mm3) |
*significantly different vs. sham operated group; †significantly different vs. single injury group. CT: Computed tomography; VV: Vasa vasorum; Volvv: VV luminal volume; Voltotal: the total volume of contrast agent.
Figure 2(a-c) Hematoxylin and Eosin staining of carotid arteries (×5). Mild intimal hyperplasia (surrounded by black dash line) was shown 8 weeks after absorbable suture was wrapped around the carotid artery (b). Pathologic intimal thickening with thrombotically active plaque was observed 4 weeks following balloon angioplasty (c). Arteriolar vasa vasorum (VV) filled with polymer (black) in sections; (d-f) Increased invasion of macrophages (brown) (×5) in single and double injury groups, revealed by monoclonal antibodies against macrophage marker CD68; (g-i) Accumulation of smooth muscle cells (×40) in injury groups. Spindle-shaped smooth muscle cells were brown in color with long nuclei stained dark blue.
Cross-sectional area of rabbit carotid arteries at the narrowest segment
| Items | Sham group ( | Single injury ( | Angioplasty ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lumen | 0.794 ± 0.126 | 0.660 ± 0.039 | 1.052 ± 0.015 | 1.735 | 0.201 |
| Intima | 0.070 ± 0.011 | 0.500 ± 0.105 | 1.006 ± 0.172*† | 9.437 | 0.001 |
| Media | 0.388 ± 0.037 | 0.561 ± 0.085 | 0.739 ± 0.049*† | 5.140 | 0.015 |
| I/M | 0.179 ± 0.023 | 0.885 ± 0.194* | 1.400 ± 0.238* | 7.609 | 0.003 |
*significantly different vs. sham operated group; †significantly different vs. single injury group. I/M: Intima/media ratio.
Figure 3Correlation between histology and based intima/media ratio and the number of vasa vasorum in the angioplasty group (n = 10).