David Donaire-Gonzalez1, Audrey de Nazelle2, Tom Cole-Hunter3, Ariadna Curto3, Daniel A Rodriguez4, Michelle A Mendez4, Judith Garcia-Aymerich3, Xavier Basagaña3, Albert Ambros3, Michael Jerrett5, Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen3. 1. Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain; Physical Activity and Sports Sciences Department, Fundació Blanquerna, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: ddonaire@creal.cat. 2. Center for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology, Barcelona, Spain; CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Departament de Ciències Experimentals i de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain. 4. Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 5. Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Physical inactivity is a leading cause of death and disability globally. Active transportation such as bicycling may increase physical activity levels. It is currently uncertain whether a shift from motorized transport modes to bicycle commuting leads to increased physical activity overall or substitutes other forms of physical activity. The study aims to disentangle whether bicycle commuting adds to or replaces other physical activities by comparing the physical activity performed by bicycle and motorized commuters. METHODS: Physical activity, travel behavior, health status, sociodemographic, and built environment characteristics were assessed for 752 adults, between June 2011 and May 2012, in Barcelona, Spain. Statistical analyses, performed in 2013-2014, included linear, non-linear, and mixture models to estimate disparities and the dose-response relationship between physical activity duration and commute mode. RESULTS: Regular bicycle commuters traveled by bicycle an average of 3.1 (SD=2.5) hours in the previous week. Bicycle commuting contributed positively to physical activity duration across participants (p<0.05). It amounted to 2.1 (95% CI=0.84, 3.55) hours/week extra of physical activity for bicycle commuters versus motorized commuters. Among bicycle travelers, there was a positive dose-response relationship between bicycle commuting and physical activity duration, with an average extra physical activity duration of 0.5 (95% CI=0.4, 0.6) hours/week for every additional 1 hour/week of bicycle commuting. CONCLUSIONS: Bicycle commuting likely adds to overall physical activity. The extra physical activity performed by bicycle commuters is undertaken as moderate physical activity and follows a sigmoidal dose-response relationship with bicycle duration.
INTRODUCTION: Physical inactivity is a leading cause of death and disability globally. Active transportation such as bicycling may increase physical activity levels. It is currently uncertain whether a shift from motorized transport modes to bicycle commuting leads to increased physical activity overall or substitutes other forms of physical activity. The study aims to disentangle whether bicycle commuting adds to or replaces other physical activities by comparing the physical activity performed by bicycle and motorized commuters. METHODS: Physical activity, travel behavior, health status, sociodemographic, and built environment characteristics were assessed for 752 adults, between June 2011 and May 2012, in Barcelona, Spain. Statistical analyses, performed in 2013-2014, included linear, non-linear, and mixture models to estimate disparities and the dose-response relationship between physical activity duration and commute mode. RESULTS: Regular bicycle commuters traveled by bicycle an average of 3.1 (SD=2.5) hours in the previous week. Bicycle commuting contributed positively to physical activity duration across participants (p<0.05). It amounted to 2.1 (95% CI=0.84, 3.55) hours/week extra of physical activity for bicycle commuters versus motorized commuters. Among bicycle travelers, there was a positive dose-response relationship between bicycle commuting and physical activity duration, with an average extra physical activity duration of 0.5 (95% CI=0.4, 0.6) hours/week for every additional 1 hour/week of bicycle commuting. CONCLUSIONS: Bicycle commuting likely adds to overall physical activity. The extra physical activity performed by bicycle commuters is undertaken as moderate physical activity and follows a sigmoidal dose-response relationship with bicycle duration.
Authors: Johan Nilsson Sommar; Christer Johansson; Boel Lövenheim; Peter Schantz; Anders Markstedt; Magnus Strömgren; Helena Stigson; Bertil Forsberg Journal: Scand J Public Health Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: David Donaire-Gonzalez; Antònia Valentín; Audrey de Nazelle; Albert Ambros; Glòria Carrasco-Turigas; Edmund Seto; Michael Jerrett; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Ione Avila-Palencia; Audrey de Nazelle; Tom Cole-Hunter; David Donaire-Gonzalez; Michael Jerrett; Daniel A Rodriguez; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-06-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jana A Hirsch; Katie A Meyer; Marc Peterson; Le Zhang; Daniel A Rodriguez; Penny Gordon-Larsen Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Evi Dons; Thomas Götschi; Mark Nieuwenhuijsen; Audrey de Nazelle; Esther Anaya; Ione Avila-Palencia; Christian Brand; Tom Cole-Hunter; Mailin Gaupp-Berghausen; Sonja Kahlmeier; Michelle Laeremans; Natalie Mueller; Juan Pablo Orjuela; Elisabeth Raser; David Rojas-Rueda; Arnout Standaert; Erik Stigell; Tina Uhlmann; Regine Gerike; Luc Int Panis Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: David Rojas-Rueda; Audrey de Nazelle; Zorana J Andersen; Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer; Jan Bruha; Hana Bruhova-Foltynova; Hélène Desqueyroux; Corinne Praznoczy; Martina S Ragettli; Marko Tainio; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Daniel H De La Iglesia; Juan F De Paz; Gabriel Villarrubia González; Alberto L Barriuso; Javier Bajo; Juan M Corchado Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2018-01-14 Impact factor: 3.576