Literature DB >> 26227799

The SWITCH study: rationale and design of the trial.

Stephan Heres1, Diana Meliu Cirjaliu2, Liana Dehelean3, Valentin Petre Matei4, Delia Marina Podea5, Dorina Sima4, Lynne Stecher6, Stefan Leucht7.   

Abstract

Many patients do not respond to the first antipsychotic drug prescribed, but require multiple trials with different drugs before response is achieved. Current treatment guidelines vary substantially in their recommendations as to how long clinicians should wait before an antipsychotic treatment attempt should be considered as failed and the compound switched. It has, however, recently been shown that poor early response to an antipsychotic is associated with continuous poor later response in the course of the same treatment attempt. This finding suggests that patients who do experience poor early response might benefit from a switch in antipsychotic medication as early as 2 weeks after treatment initiation. In the SWITCH trial, 350 patients suffering from an acute episode of schizophrenia are randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with either olanzapine or amisulpride. The primary endpoint is symptomatic remission at week 8. Patients not experiencing at least minor response after 2 weeks are randomized again to either staying on the initially assigned drug or being switched to the alternative compound for another 6 weeks. In case early switching proves superior to maintaining treatment, time wasted for unsuccessful treatment attempts could be minimized, patients' outcomes improved, duration of hospital stays reduced, and thus overall treatment expenses saved. The current report will present the methods of the trial, focusing on various specific features which could be adopted by future studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antipsychotic; Response; Response prediction; Switch; Treatment duration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26227799     DOI: 10.1007/s00406-015-0624-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0940-1334            Impact factor:   5.270


  49 in total

1.  Early prediction of antipsychotic response in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Christoph U Correll; Anil K Malhotra; Saurabh Kaushik; Marjorie McMeniman; John M Kane
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  A double-blind randomised comparative trial of amisulpride versus olanzapine for 2 months in the treatment of subjects with schizophrenia and comorbid depression.

Authors:  J-M Vanelle; S Douki
Journal:  Eur Psychiatry       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 5.361

3.  World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: long-term treatment of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Peter Falkai; Thomas Wobrock; Jeffrey Lieberman; Birte Glenthoj; Wagner F Gattaz; Hans-Jürgen Möller
Journal:  World J Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Olanzapine: a basic science update.

Authors:  F Bymaster; K W Perry; D L Nelson; D T Wong; K Rasmussen; N A Moore; D O Calligaro
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry Suppl       Date:  1999

5.  The treatment of negative symptoms and deficit states of chronic schizophrenia: olanzapine compared to amisulpride and placebo in a 6-month double-blind controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Y Lecrubier; P Quintin; M Bouhassira; E Perrin; S Lancrenon
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.392

6.  Difference in early prediction of antipsychotic non-response between risperidone and olanzapine in the treatment of acute-phase schizophrenia.

Authors:  Kotaro Hatta; Taro Otachi; Yasuhiko Sudo; Tatsuro Hayakawa; Yuko Ashizawa; Hiroshi Takebayashi; Naoki Hayashi; Hiroshi Hamakawa; Shin Ito; Reiko Nakase; Chie Usui; Hiroyuki Nakamura; Toyoaki Hirata; Yutaka Sawa
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Psychopharmacological profile of amisulpride: an antipsychotic drug with presynaptic D2/D3 dopamine receptor antagonist activity and limbic selectivity.

Authors:  G Perrault; R Depoortere; E Morel; D J Sanger; B Scatton
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Remission criteria for schizophrenia: evaluation in a large naturalistic cohort.

Authors:  Marc De Hert; Ruud van Winkel; Martien Wampers; John Kane; Jim van Os; Joseph Peuskens
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 9.  Remission in schizophrenia: validity, frequency, predictors, and patients' perspective 5 years later.

Authors:  Martin Lambert; Anne Karow; Stefan Leucht; Benno G Schimmelmann; Dieter Naber
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.986

10.  Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not.

Authors:  Melanie L Bell; Michael G Kenward; Diane L Fairclough; Nicholas J Horton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-01-21
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Maximizing response to first-line antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a review focused on finding from meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert C Smith; Stefan Leucht; John M Davis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.530

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.