David J Frankenberger1, Kristen Clements-Nolle2, Wei Yang1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada. 2. Department of Epidemiology, School of Community Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, Nevada. Electronic address: clements@unr.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on adult alcohol consumption is well-established, but little is known about the association with alcohol use during pregnancy. METHODS: Using data from the 2010 Nevada Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we assessed the relationship between ACEs and alcohol use during pregnancy in a representative sample of 1,987 adult women. An established ACEs scale was used to assess a range of childhood physical, emotional, and sexual abuse and household dysfunction (range, 0-8). Weighted logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between ACE scores and alcohol use during pregnancy after controlling for drinking before pregnancy and other covariates. RESULTS: Six percent of participants reported drinking alcohol during pregnancy. After controlling for race/ethnicity, age, employment status, smoking status, and prepregnancy alcohol use, increasing ACEs were positively associated with higher odds of alcohol use during pregnancy (1 ACE: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.92; 95% CI, 1.08-7.87), (2-3 ACEs: AOR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.46-8.48), and (≥4 ACEs: AOR, 4.79; 95% CI, 2.14-10.72). Prepregnancy drinking was also strongly associated with alcohol use during pregnancy (AOR, 11.95; 95% CI, 5.02-28.43). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of a dose-response relationship between ACEs and alcohol use during pregnancy that remained even after controlling for prepregnancy drinking and other covariates. Screening women of childbearing age as well as pregnant women for ACEs may be an effective way to identify and address many of the emotional, behavioral, and physical sequelae of childhood adversity.
BACKGROUND: The impact of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) on adult alcohol consumption is well-established, but little is known about the association with alcohol use during pregnancy. METHODS: Using data from the 2010 Nevada Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we assessed the relationship between ACEs and alcohol use during pregnancy in a representative sample of 1,987 adult women. An established ACEs scale was used to assess a range of childhood physical, emotional, and sexual abuse and household dysfunction (range, 0-8). Weighted logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between ACE scores and alcohol use during pregnancy after controlling for drinking before pregnancy and other covariates. RESULTS: Six percent of participants reported drinking alcohol during pregnancy. After controlling for race/ethnicity, age, employment status, smoking status, and prepregnancy alcohol use, increasing ACEs were positively associated with higher odds of alcohol use during pregnancy (1 ACE: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.92; 95% CI, 1.08-7.87), (2-3 ACEs: AOR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.46-8.48), and (≥4 ACEs: AOR, 4.79; 95% CI, 2.14-10.72). Prepregnancy drinking was also strongly associated with alcohol use during pregnancy (AOR, 11.95; 95% CI, 5.02-28.43). CONCLUSIONS: We found evidence of a dose-response relationship between ACEs and alcohol use during pregnancy that remained even after controlling for prepregnancy drinking and other covariates. Screening women of childbearing age as well as pregnant women for ACEs may be an effective way to identify and address many of the emotional, behavioral, and physical sequelae of childhood adversity.
Authors: Martin H Teicher; Susan L Andersen; Ann Polcari; Carl M Anderson; Carryl P Navalta; Dennis M Kim Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev Date: 2003 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 8.989
Authors: Andrea L Roberts; Kristen Lyall; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Alberto Ascherio; Marc G Weisskopf Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Karmel W Choi; Laurie A Abler; Melissa H Watt; Lisa A Eaton; Seth C Kalichman; Donald Skinner; Desiree Pieterse; Kathleen J Sikkema Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Qiu-Yue Zhong; Anne Wells; Marta B Rondon; Michelle A Williams; Yasmin V Barrios; Sixto E Sanchez; Bizu Gelaye Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Chad Lance Hemady; Lydia Gabriela Speyer; Aja Louise Murray; Ruth Harriet Brown; Franziska Meinck; Deborah Fry; Huyen Do; Siham Sikander; Bernadette Madrid; Asvini Fernando; Susan Walker; Michael Dunne; Sarah Foley; Claire Hughes; Joseph Osafo; Adriana Baban; Diana Taut; Catherine L Ward; Vo Van Thang; Pasco Fearon; Mark Tomlinson; Sara Valdebenito; Manuel Eisner Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 3.105
Authors: Scholastic Ashaba; Bernard Kakuhikire; Charles Baguma; Emily N Satinsky; Jessica M Perkins; Justin D Rasmussen; Christine E Cooper-Vince; Phionah Ahereza; Patrick Gumisiriza; Justus Kananura; David R Bangsberg; Alexander C Tsai Journal: SSM Ment Health Date: 2022-01-29