Cristina B Bares1, Kenneth S Kendler2, Hermine H Maes2. 1. School of Social Work,Virginia Commonwealth University,Richmond,VA,USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry,Virginia Commonwealth University,Richmond,VA,USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Few studies examining the genetic architecture of cigarette smoking have focused on adolescents or examined developmental changes in additive genetic, shared environment, and unique environmental influences on liability to initiate cigarette smoking and quantity of cigarettes smoked. The aim of this study was to add to the literature on liability to initiate and use cigarettes during adolescence using a nationally representative sample. METHOD: Data for this study came from adolescent and young adult twin pairs (aged 14-33 years) from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. We ran a series of developmental causal-contingent-common pathway models to examine whether additive genetic, shared, and unique environmental influences on liability to the initiation of cigarette use are shared with those on smoking quantity, and whether their contributions change across development. RESULTS: We found evidence for a developmental shift in genetic and shared environmental contributions to cigarette use. Early in adolescence, genetic and environmental influences work independently on liability to cigarette smoking initiation and quantity of cigarettes smoked, but liability to these behaviors becomes correlated as individuals age into young adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide insight into the causal processes underlying the liability to smoke cigarettes. With age, there is greater overlap in the genetic and environmental factors that influence the initiation of cigarette smoking and quantity of cigarettes smoked.
BACKGROUND: Few studies examining the genetic architecture of cigarette smoking have focused on adolescents or examined developmental changes in additive genetic, shared environment, and unique environmental influences on liability to initiate cigarette smoking and quantity of cigarettes smoked. The aim of this study was to add to the literature on liability to initiate and use cigarettes during adolescence using a nationally representative sample. METHOD: Data for this study came from adolescent and young adult twin pairs (aged 14-33 years) from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health. We ran a series of developmental causal-contingent-common pathway models to examine whether additive genetic, shared, and unique environmental influences on liability to the initiation of cigarette use are shared with those on smoking quantity, and whether their contributions change across development. RESULTS: We found evidence for a developmental shift in genetic and shared environmental contributions to cigarette use. Early in adolescence, genetic and environmental influences work independently on liability to cigarette smoking initiation and quantity of cigarettes smoked, but liability to these behaviors becomes correlated as individuals age into young adulthood. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide insight into the causal processes underlying the liability to smoke cigarettes. With age, there is greater overlap in the genetic and environmental factors that influence the initiation of cigarette smoking and quantity of cigarettes smoked.
Authors: Shaolin Wang; Andrew D van der Vaart; Qing Xu; Chamindi Seneviratne; Ovide F Pomerleau; Cynthia S Pomerleau; Thomas J Payne; Jennie Z Ma; Ming D Li Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Steven Boker; Michael Neale; Hermine Maes; Michael Wilde; Michael Spiegel; Timothy Brick; Jeffrey Spies; Ryne Estabrook; Sarah Kenny; Timothy Bates; Paras Mehta; John Fox Journal: Psychometrika Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Xiangning Chen; Jingchun Chen; Vernell S Williamson; Seon-Sook An; John M Hettema; Steven H Aggen; Michael C Neale; Kenneth S Kendler Journal: Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet Date: 2009-10-05 Impact factor: 3.568
Authors: James W Baurley; Christopher K Edlund; Carissa I Pardamean; David V Conti; Andrew W Bergen Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2016-02-27 Impact factor: 3.969