Christelle Foucher1, Patrick Aubonnet2, Petr Reichert3, Mario Berli4, Axel Schaeffer5, Cesar Gonzalo Calvo Vargas6, Anna Lochocka7, Dmitry Belenky8, Hans-Friedrich Koch9. 1. Clinsciences, Dijon, France. 2. Mylan EPD, BGP Product Operations GmBH, Allschwil, Switzerland. 3. Samostatna ordinace lekare specialisty - internisty, Teplice, Czech Republic. 4. Centro de Diagnóstico y Rehabilitación - CEDIR, Santa Fe, Argentina. 5. Essen, Germany. 6. Diseño y Planeación en Investigación Médica, Guadalajara, Mexico. 7. Niepubliczny Zakład Opieki Zdrowotnej Centrum Medyczne "OMEGA" Sp. z o.o.ul., Płock, Poland. 8. Clinical Emergency Hospital, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation. 9. Mylan EPD, Clinical development biometrics, Hannover, Germany.
Abstract
AIMS: Guidelines propose additional therapy to statin to treat elevated triglycerides (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) in dyslipidemic patients. We evaluated the effects of new fixed-dose combinations (FDC) of fenofibrate/simvastatin on plasma lipids versus simvastatin or fenofibrate monotherapies. METHODS:Subjects with mixed dyslipidemia at high or very high cardiovascular risk on stable statin therapy for at least 3 months were included in a randomized, double-blind, active-control, parallel-group study. Patients were treated with FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin 145/20 mg or 145/40 mg, simvastatin 20 mg or 40 mg, or fenofibrate 145 mg for 12 weeks. Plasma lipids, C-reactive protein, and cystatin C were measured before and after treatments. Differences in % changes were compared between FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin and monotherapies. RESULTS: Significant differences between FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin and simvastatin monotherapies were observed for the % change of TG (LS mean difference [two-sided 95% CI]: -32.2% [-38.6%, -25.8%], P < 0.001) and HDL-C (7.5% [4.7%, 10.2%], P < 0.001). A significant difference between the FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin and fenofibrate was observed for LDLC % changes (-34.7% [-40.8%, -28.5%], P < 0.001). Significant differences between FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin and their respective monotherapies were also observed for Apo B and non-HDLC % changes. The FDC were well tolerated with a similar safety profile compared with monotherapies. CONCLUSIONS:FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin are effective and well-tolerated therapies to improve the TG and HDLC profile in high-risk patients with mixed dyslipidemia.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Guidelines propose additional therapy to statin to treat elevated triglycerides (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC) in dyslipidemic patients. We evaluated the effects of new fixed-dose combinations (FDC) of fenofibrate/simvastatin on plasma lipids versus simvastatin or fenofibrate monotherapies. METHODS: Subjects with mixed dyslipidemia at high or very high cardiovascular risk on stable statin therapy for at least 3 months were included in a randomized, double-blind, active-control, parallel-group study. Patients were treated with FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin 145/20 mg or 145/40 mg, simvastatin 20 mg or 40 mg, or fenofibrate 145 mg for 12 weeks. Plasma lipids, C-reactive protein, and cystatin C were measured before and after treatments. Differences in % changes were compared between FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin and monotherapies. RESULTS: Significant differences between FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin and simvastatin monotherapies were observed for the % change of TG (LS mean difference [two-sided 95% CI]: -32.2% [-38.6%, -25.8%], P < 0.001) and HDL-C (7.5% [4.7%, 10.2%], P < 0.001). A significant difference between the FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin and fenofibrate was observed for LDLC % changes (-34.7% [-40.8%, -28.5%], P < 0.001). Significant differences between FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin and their respective monotherapies were also observed for Apo B and non-HDLC % changes. The FDC were well tolerated with a similar safety profile compared with monotherapies. CONCLUSIONS: FDC fenofibrate/simvastatin are effective and well-tolerated therapies to improve the TG and HDLC profile in high-risk patients with mixed dyslipidemia.
Authors: Joseph E Blais; Gloria Kin Yi Tong; Swathi Pathadka; Michael Mok; Ian C K Wong; Esther W Chan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 3.240