Literature DB >> 26226843

Infiltrative (sinusoidal) and hepatitic patterns of injury in acute cellular rejection in liver allograft with clinical implications.

Iram Siddiqui1, Nazia Selzner2, Sara Hafezi-Bakhtiari1, Max A Marquez2, Oyedele A Adeyi1,2.   

Abstract

Acute cellular rejection post liver transplant occurs most commonly but not exclusively in the first year. In this study, we report two patterns: sinusoidal infiltrative and hepatitic, which are not considered in the Banff system. We describe their presentation, response to Solu-Medrol, and compare these to the typical moderate-severe acute cellular rejection. Patients transplanted from 2007 to 2012 at University Health Network, who had biopsy-proven rejection in the first year, were studied. Baseline transaminases and bilirubin, time of acute cellular rejection, follow-up, and treatment responses were analyzed. A total of 407 biopsies were received, of which 77 had diagnosis of acute cellular rejection with rejection activity index 5 or above; 49 from viral hepatitis patients were excluded. Twenty-eight were included; 15/28 (54%) had typical acute cellular rejection (tACR) using Banff criteria. Six (21%) had hepatitic acute cellular rejection overlapping with typical features of acute cellular rejection; seven (25%) had infiltrative acute cellular rejection (iACR) overlapping with typical features. The iACR occurred later than the tACR (124 versus 50 days; P = 0.032) and had a higher rise in baseline aspartate aminotransferase (ΔAST) compared with tACR (289 U/l versus 109 U/l; P=0.046). Only one out of seven patients with iACR (14 versus 40% in tACR) failed Solu-Medrol boluses and required thymoglobulin. Patients with hepatitic acute cellular rejection (hACR) had similar ΔAST (P = 0.12) but higher bilirubinemia than typical acute cellular rejection (tACR) (160 μmol/l versus 35 mol/l; P = 0.039) and required thymoglobulin in four out of six (67% versus 40%) instances. Patients with iACR had higher ΔAST than tACR but better Solu-Medrol response compared with both tACR and hACR. hACR is different from plasma cell-rich late-occurring cellular rejection in its pattern but similar in its poor Solu-Medrol response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26226843     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2015.84

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  12 in total

1.  Does the Banff rejection activity index predict outcome in patients with early acute cellular rejection following liver transplantation?

Authors:  Barbara S Höroldt; Marco Burattin; Bridget K Gunson; Simon R Bramhall; Peter Nightingale; Stefan G Hübscher; James M Neuberger
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.799

2.  Plasma cell hepatitis in liver allografts: Variant of rejection or autoimmune hepatitis?

Authors:  Anthony J Demetris; Mylene Sebagh
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.799

Review 3.  Liver allograft pathology: approach to interpretation of needle biopsies with clinicopathological correlation.

Authors:  O Adeyi; S E Fischer; M Guindi
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Banff schema for grading liver allograft rejection: an international consensus document.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 17.425

5.  Lobular damage caused by cellular and humoral immunity in liver allograft rejection.

Authors:  Tokihiko Sawada; Akira Shimizu; Keiichi Kubota; Shohei Fuchinoue; Satoshi Teraoka
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.863

6.  Pathology of liver transplantation.

Authors:  H Roddy; C W Putnam; R H Fennell
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Tissue factor expression demonstrates severe sinusoidal endothelial cell damage during rejection after living-donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  Masanobu Usui; Naohisa Kuriyama; Masashi Kisawada; Takashi Hamada; Shugo Mizuno; Hiroyuki Sakurai; Masami Tabata; Hiroshi Imai; Kohji Okamoto; Shinji Uemoto; Shuji Isaji
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2009-04-17

8.  The prevalence and natural history of untreated isolated central perivenulitis in adult allograft livers.

Authors:  Alyssa M Krasinskas; A Jake Demetris; John J Poterucha; Susan C Abraham
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Posttransplant plasma cell hepatitis (de novo autoimmune hepatitis) is a variant of rejection and may lead to a negative outcome in patients with hepatitis C virus.

Authors:  M Isabel Fiel; Kaushik Agarwal; Carmen Stanca; Nassim Elhajj; Nikolas Kontorinis; Swan N Thung; Thomas D Schiano
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 5.799

10.  Immune-mediated liver dysfunction after antiviral treatment in liver transplanted patients with hepatitis C: allo or autoimmune de novo hepatitis?

Authors:  M Merli; F Gentili; M Giusto; A F Attili; S G Corradini; G Mennini; M Rossi; A Corsi; P Bianco
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 4.088

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sinusoidal endotheliitis as a histological parameter for diagnosing acute liver allograft rejection.

Authors:  Yu Shi; Kun Dong; Yu-Guo Zhang; René P Michel; Victoria Marcus; Yu-Yue Wang; Yu Chen; Zu-Hua Gao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.