Literature DB >> 26226536

Efficacy of a Tobacco Quitline in Active Duty Military and TRICARE Beneficiaries: A Randomized Trial.

Robert C Klesges1, Jon O Ebbert2, G Wayne Talcott1, Fridtjof Thomas3, Phyllis A Richey3, Catherine Womack3, Ann Hryshko-Mullen4, John Oh5.   

Abstract

A higher proportion of military personnel than civilians smoke cigarettes. Few randomized trials of tobacco use interventions have been conducted in the U.S. military. We evaluated the efficacy of a tobacco quitline (QL) in 1298 active duty military personnel, their dependents, reservists, and retirees who smoke cigarettes. Participants were randomized to either a proactive (counselor-initiated) or reactive (participant-initiated) QL intervention for 8 weeks. The proactive condition included up to an 8-week supply of free nicotine replacement therapy, and the reactive condition included a 2-week supply. The primary outcome was 12-month smoking abstinence. The enrolled population was predominantly affiliated with the Air Force and Army. At the end of treatment, proactive treatment was associated with a greater odds of both prolonged (44.22% vs. 24.96%; odds ratio [OR] = 2.4, P < 0.0001) and 7-day point prevalence (49.92% vs. 28.20%; OR = 2.5, P < 0.0001) smoking abstinence, a difference that was maintained for prolonged smoking abstinence at 12 months (22.03% vs. 13.41%; OR = 1.8, P < 0.0001). Our findings provide evidence that a proactive QL with nicotine replacement therapy is highly efficacious among Air Force and Army active duty and TRICARE beneficiaries and would provide an effective telephonic treatment option for this population of smokers. Reprint &
Copyright © 2015 Association of Military Surgeons of the U.S.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26226536     DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-14-00513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mil Med        ISSN: 0026-4075            Impact factor:   1.437


  6 in total

1.  Enhancing the efficacy of a smoking quit line in the military: Study rationale, design and methods of the Freedom quit line.

Authors:  Melissa A Little; Jon O Ebbert; Zoran Bursac; Gerald W Talcott; Lauren Talley; Karen M LeRoy; Catherine R Womack; Ann S Hryshko-Mullen; Robert C Klesges
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Fit & quit: An efficacy trial of two behavioral post-cessation weight gain interventions.

Authors:  Francisco I Salgado García; Karen J Derefinko; Zoran Bursac; Robert C Klesges; Jon O Ebbert; Catherine R Womack; Rebecca A Krukowski
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  "Nobody Views It As a Negative Thing to Smoke": A Qualitative Study of the Relationship Between United States Air Force Culture and Tobacco Use.

Authors:  Rebecca A Krukowski; Kathleen Porter; Tina Boothe; G Wayne Talcott; Melissa A Little
Journal:  Mil Psychol       Date:  2021-10-08

4.  Planning a Change Easily (PACE): A randomized controlled trial for smokers who are not ready to quit.

Authors:  Francisco I Salgado García; Karen J Derefinko; Zoran Bursac; Sarah Hand; Robert C Klesges
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  Telephone counselling for smoking cessation.

Authors:  William Matkin; José M Ordóñez-Mena; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-02

6.  Mental health, physical health, and health-related behaviors of U.S. Army Special Forces.

Authors:  Adam D Cooper; Steven G Warner; Anna C Rivera; Rudolph P Rull; Amy B Adler; Dennis J Faix; Rob Neff; Edwin A Deagle; Ryan J Caserta; Cynthia A LeardMann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.