Literature DB >> 26225770

The c-MET Network as Novel Prognostic Marker for Predicting Bladder Cancer Patients with an Increased Risk of Developing Aggressive Disease.

Young-Won Kim1, Seok Joong Yun1, Phildu Jeong1, Seon-Kyu Kim2, Seon-Young Kim3, Chunri Yan1, Sung Phil Seo1, Sang Keun Lee1, Jayoung Kim4, Wun-Jae Kim1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that c-MET is overexpressed in cases of aggressive bladder cancer (BCa). Identification of crosstalk between c-MET and other RTKs such as AXL and PDGFR suggest that c-MET network genes (c-MET-AXL-PDGFR) may be clinically relevant to BCa. Here, we examine whether expression of c-MET network genes can be used to identify BCa patients at increased risk of developing aggressive disease. In vitro analysis, c-MET knockdown suppressed cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, and increased sensitivity to cisplatin-induced apoptosis. In addition, c-MET network gene (c-MET, AXL, and PDGFR) expression allowed discrimination of BCa tissues from normal control tissues and appeared to predict poor disease progression in non-muscle invasive BCa patients and poor overall survival in muscle invasive BCa patients. These results suggest that c-MET network gene expression is a novel prognostic marker for predicting which BCa patients have an increased risk of developing aggressive disease. These genes might be a useful marker for co-targeting therapy, and are expected to play an important role in improving both response to treatment and survival of BCa patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26225770      PMCID: PMC4520492          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Overexpression of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) occurs in cases of aggressive bladder cancer (BCa); thus RTK-targeting therapies are recommended for such patients [1, 2]. Pharmacological inhibition of RTK activity (e.g., with gefitinib) is the gold standard treatment for BCa patients, although it has met with limited success [3, 4]. The c-MET proto-oncogene, which is located on chromosome 7q21-31 [5], is overexpressed in BCa. c-MET is activated by its ligand, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), and induces increased proliferation, migration, motility, and invasion of BCa cells [6]. Upon stimulation and dimerization of c-MET, tyrosine phosphorylation occurs at specific sites within the intracellular domain (i.e., Y1234, Y1235, Y1349, and Y1356), which increases the intrinsic activity of tyrosine kinases and leads to the recruitment of many signaling proteins, including growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (GRB2), Grb2-associated binder-1 (GAB1), Src homology 2 domain containing (SHC), phospholipase C1 (PLC1), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3-K) [7]. The Ras/Erk-MAPK, PI3-K/Akt/mTOR [8], and STAT3 signaling pathways are also activated, thereby inducing several biological responses [6, 9]. Overexpression of c-MET correlates with BCa metastasis [7, 10]; indeed, c-MET is overexpressed in more than 60% of locally advanced and metastatic BCa cases [5], and is linked to poor survival [11]. Considering that the dimerization of RTKs is important for controlling their biological function in the context of cancer, crosstalk between c-MET and other RTKs should be investigated carefully if we are to understand the role of c-MET in human cancer progression. Sections of primary tumor from patients with a rare type of BCa, called neuroendocrine (NE) BCa, show c-MET expression [12]. This suggests that NE BCa may be a suitable target for c-MET inhibitors. A previous study showed that a member of the c-MET family, recepteur d’origine Nantais (RON), forms a heterodimer with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [13]. In addition, RTK microarray analysis revealed that RTKs such as AXL and PDGFR crosstalk with c-MET [11]. AXL and PDGFR are associated with aggressive breast [14], kidney [15], lung [16, 17], and prostate cancers [18, 19], suggesting that c-MET-AXL-PDGFR may be clinically relevant to BCa [11]. The aim of the present study was to examine the clinical association between the expression of c-MET network genes (c-MET-AXL-PDGFR) and disease outcome for BCa patients, and to investigate whether c-MET network genes can be used to identify BCa patients at increased risk of developing aggressive disease.

Materials and Methods

Patients and tissue samples

Primary tumor samples from patients who underwent transurethral resection (TUR) or radical cystectomy at Chungbuk National University in South Korea were histologically verified as urothelial carcinoma. Normal bladder mucosa was harvested from patients with benign diseases such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), ureter stones, and stress urinary incontinence, after informed consent. All control tissues were histologically confirmed as normal. Patients with concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS), CIS lesions alone, a short follow-up period (less than 6 months), or for whom data were incomplete, were excluded to yield a more homogeneous study population. A total of 165 (135 male and 30 female; average age, 65 years) BCa patients and 34 controls (19 male and 15 female; average age, 54 years) were enrolled. All tumors were macro-dissected (typically within 15 minutes of surgical resection), and each BCa specimen was confirmed by pathological analysis of a fresh frozen tissue section derived from TUR or cystectomy specimens. Tumor samples were then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until use. NMIBC patients underwent a second TUR 2–4 weeks after initial resection if the BCa specimen did not include the proper muscle layer or when a high-grade tumor was detected. Patients with a T1 tumor, multiple tumors, large tumors (>3 cm in diameter), or high-grade Ta NMIBC received one cycle of intravesical treatment [bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or mitomycin-C]. Response to treatment was assessed by cystoscopy and urinary cytology. Patients who were disease-free within 3 months of treatment were followed-up every 3 months for the first 2 years and then every 6 months thereafter. MIBC patients with clinically localized or locally advanced tumors and good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 or 1) underwent radical cystectomy and complete pelvic lymph node dissection. Patients not eligible for radical cystectomy due to metastatic disease, poor life expectancy, or poor ECOG performance status (≥2) underwent TUR or biopsy for histopathological diagnosis. Patients with pT3, pT4, or node-positive disease (based on the analysis of radical cystectomy specimens) and those with metastatic disease but good performance status received at least four cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients who refused or did not complete an imaging work-up [computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)] at least once every 3 months to evaluate responses were excluded from further analysis. Tumors were staged and graded according to the 2002 TNM classification and the European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines based on the 1973 WHO grading system [20, 21]. Recurrence was defined as recurrence of primary NMIBC with a lower or the same pathological stage, and progression was defined as the identification of T2 or higher stage disease upon relapse. In the case of MIBC, progression was defined as locoregional recurrence or a new distant metastasis in cystectomized patients and a ≥20% increase in the mass of the primary tumor or a new distant metastasis in non-cystectomized patients.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription to cDNA

RNA was isolated from tissues by homogenization with 1 ml of TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) in a 5 ml glass tube. The homogenate was then transferred to a 1.5 ml tube and mixed with 200 ml of chloroform. After incubating for 5 min at 4°C, the homogenate was centrifuged for 13 min at 13,000 g at 4°C. The upper aqueous phase was transferred to a clean tube containing 500 ml of isopropanol. The mixture was incubated for 60 min at 4°C and then centrifuged for 8 min at 13,000 g at 4°C. The upper aqueous phase was discarded and mixed with 500 ml of 75% ethanol and centrifuged for 5 min at 13,000 g at 4°C. The upper aqueous layer was discarded, and the pellet was dried at room temperature, dissolved in DEPC-treated water, and then stored at -80°C. The quality and integrity of the RNA were confirmed using a Nanodrop device. cDNA was prepared from 1 mg of total RNA using a First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Amersham Biosciences Europe GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Cell culture and transfection

T24 BCa cells were obtained and cultured according to the instructions provide by the ATCC. Media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2% glutamine, and 1% antibiotics (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and cells were maintained under a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. For the knockdown experiments, cells were transiently transfected with 200 pmol siRNA pool to silence MET (MET siRNAs, Life Technologies, catalog number 103545, 103551, 103557, 103767 and 103769) or negative control siRNAs, using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen).

Proliferation assay

SiRNA-transfected cells were seeded in 24-well plates at a density of 1 × 104/well. Cells were then stained with crystal violet and counted 7 days later [22].

Anchorage-independent soft agar growth assay

SiRNA-transfected cells (1 × 104) were seeded into 3 ml of 0.35% agar in FBS-containing culture medium and overlaid onto 2 ml of 0.7% agar in FBS-containing culture medium in 6-well plates. Images of 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiaz-113 olyl-2)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)-stained colonies were captured under a Zeiss microscope as described previously [22].

Invasion assay

Cells (3 × 105 cells/ml) were counted and seeded onto collagen-coated inserts (Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA). After 16 h, the cells that migrated to the bottom surface of the inserts were stained with crystal violet solution. The dye was extracted from the cells using 10% acetic acid solution, and absorbance was read in a FLUOstar Omega microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Cary, NC) as previously described [22].

Cell apoptosis assay

T24 cells transiently transfected with siRNA were incubated in medium with or without 10 μM cisplatin for 8 hours. Cell viability was measured in an MTT assay as previously described [23]. Cell apoptosis was quantified by measuring the metabolically active mass of the treated cells after normalization against untreated cells.

Wound-healing (in vitro scratch) assay

T24 cells grown on poly-L-lysin were co-transfected with the plasmid encoding GFP. They were then subjected to in vitro scratch assay with images captured at 0 and 16 h after incubation using fluorescence microscope. Cells moved from the edge of the scratch toward the center of the scratch (marked by yellow dotted lines).

Western blot analysis

Transfected T24 cells were quickly harvested, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C. Total protein was extracted in lysis buffer [1% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4), 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM NaF, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and Complete protease inhibitor cocktail tablet (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany)] at the indicated conditions and centrifuged at 12,500 g for 15 min. 25μg proteins per each conditions were subjected to SDS-PAGE gel running, which were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes for Western blot analysis. After blocking with 10% BSA/PBST for 1h, membranes were incubated with specific antibodies against c-MET, MMP2, MMP9 or β-actin. The blots were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence.

Computational analysis

To study the association between c-MET network genes and clinical parameters in BCa patients, we examined the expression profiles of these genes in BCa patients using previously obtained microarray data (accession number GSE13507). Microarray data were available for 165 patients. Clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were obtained from medical records. The correlation between gene expression and disease outcome was examined using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival curve analysis using a subset of gene expression profiles from patients with “low” and “high” expression of each gene were used to identify the effects of c-MET network gene expression on BCa. The 50th percentile (median) of gene expression was used as the cuff-off value. The log-rank test was performed to assess the significance of differences between two survival curves.

Ethical statement

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chungbuk National University. All subjects provided written informed consent. Sample collection and analysis were approved by The Institutional Review Board of Chungbuk National University.

Results

Clinical and pathological characteristics of BCa patients

The mean age of the 165 patients in the study cohort was 65.2 ± 12.0 years, and the mean follow-up period was 48.4 months. Of the 165 patients, 62.4% (103/165) had NMIBC and 37.6% (62/165) had MIBC. The mean age of the 34 patients in the normal control cohort was 54.0 ± 10.4 years. The baseline characteristics of the patients and controls are presented in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinico-pathological features of patients with bladder cancer and normal controls.

VariblesStudy cohort (n = 165)NC (n = 34)
Age—yr (mean)65.2 ± 12.054 ± 10.4
Gender—no. of patients (%)
        Male135 (81.8)19 (55.9)
        Female30 (18.2)15 (44.1)
Grade—no. of patients (%)
        Low105 (63.6)
        High60 (36.4)
Stage—no. of patients (%)
    NMIBC103 (62.4)
        Ta23 (22.3)
        T180 (77.7)
    MIBC62 (37.6)
        T2N0M026 (41.9)
        T3N0M013 (21.0)
        T4/Any T N+/M+23 (37.1)
Recurrence—no. of patients with NMIBC (%)
        No67 (65.0)
        Yes36 (35.0)
Progression—no. of patients (%)
    NMIBC
        No92 (89.3)
        Yes11 (10.7)
    MIBC
        No42 (67.7)
        Yes20 (32.3)
Survival—no. of patients with MIBC (%)
    Cancer-specific
        Alive33 (53.2)
        Deceased29 (46.8)
    Overall survival
        Alive28 (45.2)
        Deceased34 (54.8)
Mean follow-up—months48.4

Abbreviations: NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; NC, normal control.

Abbreviations: NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; NC, normal control.

Loss of c-MET suppresses BCa cell proliferation and invasion and increases sensitivity to cisplatin-induced apoptosis

Previous studies suggest that stromal HGF signaling via the c-MET pathway increases invasion and metastasis of BCa cells [6, 11, 13]; therefore, we sought to determine the effects of c-MET silencing on proliferation and invasion, and on the apoptotic response to cisplatin (a major chemotherapeutic agent used to treat BCa patients). We found that the BCa cells in which c-MET was knocked down formed fewer (and smaller) colonies than the negative control cells, suggesting a reduction in cell proliferation in soft agar (Fig 1A). The cell invasion assay showed that BCa cells harboring intact c-MET were more invasive than those in which c-MET was knocked down. c-MET-silenced T24 cells were much less invasive than controls cells (non-transfected cells and cells transfected with control siRNA) (Fig 1B). We next examined the consequence of c-MET loss on cell apoptosis in an MTT assay. c-MET knockdown cells showed increased sensitivity to cisplatin-induced apoptosis (Fig 1C).
Fig 1

Loss of c-MET reduced anchorage-independent proliferation (A) and invasion (B) of T24 bladder cancer cells with an increased cisplatin-induced cell apoptosis (C).

All experiments were performed using three c-MET knockdown cell lines (sic-MET-1, sic-MET-2, and sic-MET-3) transfected with different METsiRNAs, and two controls cell lines (Ctrl and NT). Ctrl, control; NT, non-transfected.*p<0.05.

Loss of c-MET reduced anchorage-independent proliferation (A) and invasion (B) of T24 bladder cancer cells with an increased cisplatin-induced cell apoptosis (C).

All experiments were performed using three c-MET knockdown cell lines (sic-MET-1, sic-MET-2, and sic-MET-3) transfected with different METsiRNAs, and two controls cell lines (Ctrl and NT). Ctrl, control; NT, non-transfected.*p<0.05.

Loss of c-MET inhibits the cell migration of BCa cells by downregulating MMP2 and MMP9

We examined cell migration and MMP2 and MMP9 expression in BCa cells. Wound-healing assay (also called as in vitro scratch assay) showed that c-MET-knockdown cells migrated less efficiently than control cells (Fig 2A). We also found that knocking down c-MET downregulated the expression of MMP2 and MMP9 in BCa cells (Fig 2B).
Fig 2

MMP2 and MMP9 may be downstream effectors of c-MET knockdown, leading to suppression of migration in T24 bladder cancer cells.

(A) Wound-healing assay showing that knockdown of c-MET inhibitsthe migration of T24 cells. (B) Loss of c-MET downregulated the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and MMP-9. All experiments were performed using two c-MET knockdown cell lines (sic-MET-1 and sic-MET-2) transfected with different MET siRNAs, and two control cell lines (Ctrl and NT). Ctrl, control; NT, non-transfected.

MMP2 and MMP9 may be downstream effectors of c-MET knockdown, leading to suppression of migration in T24 bladder cancer cells.

(A) Wound-healing assay showing that knockdown of c-MET inhibitsthe migration of T24 cells. (B) Loss of c-MET downregulated the expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and MMP-9. All experiments were performed using two c-MET knockdown cell lines (sic-MET-1 and sic-MET-2) transfected with different MET siRNAs, and two control cell lines (Ctrl and NT). Ctrl, control; NT, non-transfected.

Expression of c-MET correlates with OS in MIBC patients

To answer the question of whether c-MET network genes are involved in BCa progression and aggressiveness, we analyzed the expression of mRNA for these genes in a DNA microarray and compared the results with disease characteristics such as tumor grade (G), tumor stage (T, N, and M), tumor size, recurrence, progression, and CSS. Further comparisons were then performed after patients were categorized into NMIBC and MIBC groups. The results revealed that c-MET mRNA expression in MIBC patients correlated significantly with OS (p = 0.023; HR, 2.107; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.110–3.998) (Table 2). These data were confirmed by KM survival curve analysis (Fig 3). BCa patients with high levels of c-MET expression showed poorer survival than those with low expression (log-rank test, p = 0.020).
Table 2

c-MET gene expression correlates to OS of MIBC patients.

Gene symbolsp-valueHazard ratio95% confidence interval
NMIBC recurrence c-MET 0.120 1.640 0.879–3.060
NMIBC progression c-MET 0.363 1.682 0.549–5.154
MIBC progression c-MET 0.237 1.662 0.716–3.858
MIBC CSS c-MET 0.142 1.728 0.832–3.590
MIBC OS c-MET 0.023 2.107 1.110–3.998

NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; CSS, cancer-specific survival; OS, overall survival.

Fig 3

Kaplan–Meier curves showing that high expression of c-MET genes correlates with poor overall survival of MIBC patients.

NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; CSS, cancer-specific survival; OS, overall survival.

The expression of AXL can distinguish between NMIBC and MIBC patients and healthy controls

We next examined the clinical association between known c-MET partners, AXL and PDGFR, and BCa progression. The results showed that AXL expression clearly correlated with both NMIBC and MIBC. Bladder tumors (NMIBC and MIBC) showed 0.471-fold higher expression of AXL mRNA than control tissues. AXL mRNA expression by NMIBC (p < 0.0001, false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.0001) and MIBC (p = 0.0001, FDR = 0.0006) was significantly higher than that in normal controls (Table 3). AXL mRNA expression in NMIBC tissue was approximately 1.532-fold higher than that in MIBC tissue (Table 3).
Table 3

AXL mRNA expression in bladder cancer (NMIBC and MIBC) patients and normal controls.

Gene symbolsp-valueFDRFold change
Normal vs. BT (NMIBC+ MIBC) AXL <0.0001 <0.0001 0.471
Normal vs. NMIBC AXL <0.0001 <0.0001 0.401
Normal vs. MIBC AXL 0.0001 0.0006 0.614
NMIBC vs. MIBC AXL <0.0001 0.0008 1.532

FDR, false discovery rate; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; BT, bladder tumor

FDR, false discovery rate; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; BT, bladder tumor

Expression of PDGFR isoforms is significantly altered in BCa, and high expression of PDGFRL predicts poor survival

To test whether PDGFR is useful as a diagnostic classifier, we examined the expression of three different isoforms (i.e., PDGFRA, PDGFRB, and PDGFRL). We found that the expression of PDGFR isoforms could be used to distinguish NMIBC and MIBC samples from normal controls. The expression of PDGFRA mRNA clearly discriminated bladder tumors (NMIBC and MIBC) from normal control tissues (p < 0.0001, FDR < 0.0001), with PDGFRA expression in NMIBC and MIBC being approximately 0.274-fold higher than that in controls. The expression of PDGFRB was also clearly different between tumors and normal tissues (p = 0.0001, FDR < 0.0001). PDGFRB expression in NMIBC was significantly greater than that in normal controls (p < 0.0001), but no significant difference was shown between MIBC and normal controls (p = 0.0698). Similarly, PDGFRL was differentially expressed in NMIBC and normal controls, with a modest increase (0.804-fold) (p < 0.0001) in the former. Thus, it is likely that PDGFR expression is increased in all types of BCa. It is noteworthy that the expression of PDGFR isoforms in tissues from NMIBC patients was generally higher than that in tissues from MIBC patients (Table 4).
Table 4

Expression of PDGFR isoforms in bladder cancer (NMIBC and MIBC) patients.

Gene symbolsp-valueFDRFold change
Normal vs. BT (NMIBC+ MIBC) PDGFRA <0.0001 <0.0001 0.274
Normal vs. NMIBC PDGFRA <0.0001 <0.0001 0.256
Normal vs. MIBC PDGFRA <0.0001 <0.0001 0.308
NMIBC vs. MIBC PDGFRA 0.0922 0.2335 1.205
Normal vs. BT (NMIBC+ MIBC) PDGFRB <0.0001 <0.0001 0.569
Normal vs. NMIBC PDGFRB <0.0001 <0.0001 0.465
Normal vs. MIBC PDGFRB 0.0698 0.1354 0.796
NMIBC vs. MIBC PDGFRB <0.0001 0.0001 1.712
Normal vs. BT (NMIBC+ MIBC) PDGFRL 0.2057 0.3011 0.921
Normal vs. NMIBC PDGFRL 0.0001 0.0006 0.804
Normal vs. MIBC PDGFRL 0.0835 0.1562 1.154
NMIBC vs. MIBC PDGFRL <0.0001 <0.0001 1.435

FDR, false discovery rate; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; BT, bladder tumor

FDR, false discovery rate; NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; BT, bladder tumor Next, to understand the clinical relevance of increased PDGFR expression in BCa, we examined the clinical correlation between PDGFR isoform expression and disease progression. We found that PDGFRL expression was significantly correlated with NMIBC progression (p = 0.046; HR, 3.675; 95% CI, 1.024–13.188) (Table 5). KM survival analysis showed that NMIBC patients with high expression of PDGFRL showed poorer PFS than those with low expression of PDGFRL (log-rank test, p = 0.032) (Fig 4).
Table 5

Expression of PDGFR isoforms and clinicopathological features of bladder cancer.

Gene symbolsp-valueHazard ratio95% confidence interval
NMIBC recurrence PDGFRA 0.614 1.173 0.630–2.184
NMIBC progression PDGFRA 0.466 0.660 0.215–2.021
MIBC progression PDGFRA 0.941 1.032 0.445–2.397
MIBC CSS PDGFRA 0.410 1.373 0.645–2.923
MIBC OS PDGFRA 0.603 1.190 0.617–2.294
NMIBC recurrence PDGFRB 0.551 0.826 0.441–1.547
NMIBC progression PDGFRB 0.981 1.014 0.339–3.031
MIBC progression PDGFRB 0.796 1.153 0.391–3.403
MIBC CSS PDGFRB 0.681 0.837 0.359–1.951
MIBC OS PDGFRB 0.873 0.939 0.430–2.046
NMIBC recurrence PDGFRL 0.295 1.398 0.746–2.621
NMIBC progression PDGFRL 0.046 3.675 1.024–13.188
MIBC progression PDGFRL 0.283 1.945 0.577–6.561
MIBC CSS PDGFRL 0.894 0.944 0.406–2.195
MIBC OS PDGFRL 0.861 0.935 0.444–1.972

NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; CSS, cancer-specific survival; OS, overall survival.

Fig 4

Kaplan–Meier curves showing that high expression of PDGFRL (one of the PDGFR isoforms) correlates with disease progression in NMIBC patients.

NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; CSS, cancer-specific survival; OS, overall survival.

Expression levels of c-MET network genes is significantly correlated with disease progression in NMIBC patients and with OS in MIBC patients

To identify the clinical importance of c-MET network genes, we examined the association between c-MET network gene expression (c-MET, AXL, and PDGFR) and BCa prognosis. Expression of c-MET network genes was based on an assessment of the risk score for each patient calculated by combining the expression levels of all three genes. We found that expression of c-MET network genes correlated significantly with disease progression in NMIBC patients (p = 0.023; HR, 4.386; 95% CI, 1.221–15.757) and with OS in MIBC patients (p = 0.038; HR, 1.976; 95% CI, 1.039–3.759) (Table 6). KM survival analysis showed that NMIBC patients with high expression of c-MET network genes showed poorer PFS (log-rank test, p = 0.013) than those with low expression. Similarly, MIBC patients (log-rank test, p = 0.034) with high expression of c-MET network genes showed poorer OS than those with low expression (Fig 5).
Table 6

c-MET network gene expression correlates with NMIBC progression and with OS of MIBC patients.

Gene symbolsp-valueHazard ratio95% Confidence interval
NMIBC recurrence c-MET network 0.143 1.600 0.853–3.002
NMIBC progression c-MET network 0.023 4.386 1.221–15.757
MIBC progression c-MET network 0.499 1.328 0.584–3.016
MIBC CSS c-MET network 0.348 1.403 0.691–2.848
MIBC OS c-MET network 0.038 1.976 1.039–3.759

NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; CSS, cancer-specific survival; OS, overall survival.

Fig 5

Kaplan–Meier curves showing that high expression of c-MET network genes correlates with (A) poor progression-free survival in NMIBC patientsand (B) poor overall survival in MIBC patients.

NMIBC, non-muscle invasive bladder cancer; MIBC, muscle invasive bladder cancer; CSS, cancer-specific survival; OS, overall survival.

Discussion

The results of the present study suggest that loss of c-MET makes BCa cells less invasive and more susceptible to cisplatin. Also, the expression pattern of c-MET network genes allows the discrimination of BCa tissues from normal control tissues and appears to predict poor clinical outcomes in a Korean patient population. Aberrant c-MET expression occurs in various cancers and is associated with a poor prognosis [24]. Overexpression of c-MET in BCa is associated with poor OS and metastasis-free survival [5, 7, 10]. Yeh et al. reported that overexpression of c-MET is positively associated with muscle invasion and poor long-term survival (p < 0.001) [11]. Previous reports suggest that c-MET expression is closely associated with both tumor aggressiveness and patient survival [5, 7, 10, 11, 18]. The results presented herein are in agreement with those in previous studies. We found that overexpression of c-MET was significantly associated with poor survival, particularly OS in MIBC patients. This suggests that inhibiting c-MET expression may play an important role in preventing BCa progression and improve patient survival. In vitro analysis showed that c-MET knockdown suppressed cell proliferation, invasion, and migration, and reduced the expression of MMP2 and MMP9. This was accompanied by increased sensitivity to cisplatin-induced apoptosis. MMP2 and MMP9 degrade extracellular matrix proteins, thereby facilitating cell invasion and metastasis [25, 26]. These results indicate that c-MET inhibition is likely to reduce cancer invasion and metastasis and to improve the survival of cancer patients. Thus, a more focused understanding of the importance of the c-MET inhibition is needed if we are to develop inhibitors that target c-MET in various tumors. Recently, several c-MET-targeting drugs were tested in clinical trials, and all show promising clinical activity with acceptable side effects [27]. For example, tivantinib (also called ARQ197) and a dual inhibitor of c-MET/VEGFR2 (foretinib) were studied in phase I to II clinical trials in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively [24]. A novel multikinase inhibitor of MET, VERFR1, AXL, TIE2, KIT, FLT3, and RET, called cabozantinib (also known as XL184), inhibits the growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis in pancreatic cancer and glioblastoma, and reduces resistance to gemcitabine. In particular, clinical trials in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients reported a promising effect on PFS, bone metastasis, and pain [28]. However, tumors that initially show a good response to MET inhibitors may later develop resistance [24]. Acquired resistance to MET inhibitors develops via multiple mechanisms including genetic alterations (e.g., secondary EGFR T790M mutation), MET amplification, and activated signaling pathways [29]. Thus, multiple combination target therapy or co-targeting therapy might be necessary to prevent drug resistance and to achieve beneficial outcomes [24]. It is important to examine the crosstalk between c-MET and other RTKs because crosstalk partners of c-MET may be important biomarkers for co-targeting therapy and help to prevent resistance to individual MET inhibitors. RON, AXL and PDGFR have a crosstalk with c-MET. Overexpression of AXL and PDGFR is associated with aggressiveness and prognosis of a tumor series [14-19]. The results presented herein are consistent with previous studies in this respect; however, there were some differences. In contrast to the study by Yet et al., which evaluated the association between PDGFRA and BCa progression, we examined all three PDGFR isoforms: PDGFRA, PDGFRB, and PDGFRL. However, only PDGFRL was associated with NMIBC progression. Most studies that aimed to identify a correlation between BCa progression and PDGFR examined the PDGFRA and PDGFRB isoforms. Therefore, the present study is the first to identify a significant association between PDGFRL expression and BCa prognosis. In addition, Yet et al. only examined the roles of AXL and PDGFR in advanced cases [11]. Here, we showed that expression of AXL and PDGFR distinguished NMIBC and MIBC from healthy controls. In particular, expression of both of these genes was higher in NMIBC patients than in MIBC patients. Thus, AXL and PDGFRL may be more specific for NMIBC than MIBC. A large validation is needed to clarify the roles and effects of PDGFR isoforms on BCa (NMIBC and MIBC) prognosis. We also found that c-MET network gene (c-MET, AXL, and PDGFR) expression was closely associated with disease progression in NMIBC patients and with poor survival (especially OS) in MIBC patients. These results suggest that inhibiting the c-MET pathway may prevent disease progression in NMIBC patients and improve the survival of MIBC patients. Also, multi-combination or co-targeting therapies might be needed to prevent acquired drug resistance. Yeh et al. demonstrated that 21.5% (14/65) of patients co-expressing c-MET/AXL/PDGFR showed poor long-term survival (p = 0.015) [11]. However, they only identified a clinical correlation between c-MET network genes in patients with locally advanced and metastatic BCa. Here, we identified a clinical correlation in patients with NMIBC or MIBC. Thus, the present study suggests that the c-MET network is a promising biomarker and target for co-targeting drugs; this should be tested in clinical trials involving both NMIBC and MIBC patients. Taken together, these data suggest that (1) c-MET/AXL/PDGFR levels can be used to distinguish cancer patients from normal controls and to distinguish NMIBC from MIBC; and (2) the expression of c-MET network genes is significantly associated with poorer survival rates for BCa patients. Identifying the signaling networks involved may provide information that will further our understanding of the mechanisms underlying tumor biology and help to predict potential drug resistance [30]. We believe that c-MET network gene expression is a novel prognostic marker for predicting which BCa patients have an increased risk of developing aggressive disease. These genes might be a useful marker for co-targeting therapy, and are expected to play an important role in improving both response to treatment and survival of BCa patients.

Dataset with recurrence, progression, and 5 genes in NMIBC patients.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Dataset with progression, overall survival, cancer specific survival, and 5 genes in MIBC patients.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Dataset with recurrence, progression, and C-MET network genes in NMIBC patients.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.

Dataset with progression, overall survival, cancer specific survival, and C-MET network genes in MIBC patients.

(PDF) Click here for additional data file.
  30 in total

Review 1.  Targeting MET in cancer: rationale and progress.

Authors:  Ermanno Gherardi; Walter Birchmeier; Carmen Birchmeier; George Vande Woude
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  An hTERT-immortalized human urothelial cell line that responds to anti-proliferative factor.

Authors:  Jayoung Kim; Mihee Ji; Joseph A DiDonato; Raymond R Rackley; Mei Kuang; Provash C Sadhukhan; Joshua R Mauney; Susan K Keay; Michael R Freeman; Louis S Liou; Rosalyn M Adam
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  MicroRNA-409-3p inhibits migration and invasion of bladder cancer cells via targeting c-Met.

Authors:  Xin Xu; Hong Chen; Yiwei Lin; Zhenghui Hu; Yeqing Mao; Jian Wu; Xianglai Xu; Yi Zhu; Shiqi Li; Xiangyi Zheng; Liping Xie
Journal:  Mol Cells       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 5.034

4.  Trafficking of nuclear heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor into an epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent autocrine loop in response to oxidative stress.

Authors:  Jayoung Kim; Rosalyn M Adam; Michael R Freeman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Phosphorylated hepatocyte growth factor receptor/c-Met is associated with tumor growth and prognosis in patients with bladder cancer: correlation with matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -7 and E-cadherin.

Authors:  Yasuyoshi Miyata; Yuji Sagara; Shigeru Kanda; Tomayoshi Hayashi; Hiroshi Kanetake
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  Prognostic value of MET, RON and histoprognostic factors for urothelial carcinoma in the upper urinary tract.

Authors:  E Compérat; M Roupret; E Chartier-Kastler; M O Bitker; F Richard; P Camparo; F Capron; O Cussenot
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-01-25       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  AKT facilitates EGFR trafficking and degradation by phosphorylating and activating PIKfyve.

Authors:  Ekrem Emrah Er; Michelle C Mendoza; Ashley M Mackey; Lucia E Rameh; John Blenis
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 8.192

8.  Prognostic impact of platelet-derived growth factors in non-small cell lung cancer tumor and stromal cells.

Authors:  Tom Donnem; Samer Al-Saad; Khalid Al-Shibli; Sigve Andersen; Lill-Tove Busund; Roy M Bremnes
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. A multivariate survival analysis.

Authors:  P L Nguyen; P E Swanson; W Jaszcz; D M Aeppli; G Zhang; T P Singleton; S Ward; D Dykoski; J Harvey; G A Niehans
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.493

10.  Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer.

Authors:  Klarisa Rikova; Ailan Guo; Qingfu Zeng; Anthony Possemato; Jian Yu; Herbert Haack; Julie Nardone; Kimberly Lee; Cynthia Reeves; Yu Li; Yerong Hu; Zhiping Tan; Matthew Stokes; Laura Sullivan; Jeffrey Mitchell; Randy Wetzel; Joan Macneill; Jian Min Ren; Jin Yuan; Corey E Bakalarski; Judit Villen; Jon M Kornhauser; Bradley Smith; Daiqiang Li; Xinmin Zhou; Steven P Gygi; Ting-Lei Gu; Roberto D Polakiewicz; John Rush; Michael J Comb
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  5 in total

1.  The innate immune response in fetal lung mesenchymal cells targets VEGFR2 expression and activity.

Authors:  Rachel M Medal; Amanda M Im; Yasutoshi Yamamoto; Omar Lakhdari; Timothy S Blackwell; Hal M Hoffman; Debashis Sahoo; Lawrence S Prince
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 5.464

2.  Validation of a Multiplexed Gene Signature Assay for Diagnosis of Canine Cancers from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues.

Authors:  B Davis; M Schwartz; D Duchemin; J Carl Barrett; G Post
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  c-Met activation leads to the establishment of a TGFβ-receptor regulatory network in bladder cancer progression.

Authors:  Wen Jing Sim; Prasanna Vasudevan Iyengar; Dilraj Lama; Sarah Kit Leng Lui; Hsien Chun Ng; Lior Haviv-Shapira; Eytan Domany; Dennis Kappei; Tuan Zea Tan; Azad Saei; Patrick William Jaynes; Chandra Shekhar Verma; Alan Prem Kumar; Mathieu Rouanne; Hong Koo Ha; Camelia Radulescu; Peter Ten Dijke; Pieter Johan Adam Eichhorn; Jean Paul Thiery
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 4.  c-Met: A Promising Therapeutic Target in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Yanfei Feng; Zitong Yang; Xin Xu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 3.602

Review 5.  Role of tyrosine kinases in bladder cancer progression: an overview.

Authors:  Amir Sadra Zangouei; Amir Hossein Barjasteh; Hamid Reza Rahimi; Majid Mojarrad; Meysam Moghbeli
Journal:  Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.712

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.