Takahiro Mihara1, Nobuhito Nakamura, Koui Ka, Mari S Oba, Takahisa Goto. 1. From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Kanagawa Children's Medical Centre (TM, NN), Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Yokohama City University (MSO), and Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan (TG).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergence agitation is a common phenomenon in children recovering from general anaesthesia. An emergence agitation reaction increases the risk of injuring the surgical repair, the patient and the caregivers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of melatonin premedication in emergence agitation prevention. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with trial sequential analysis (TSA) and meta-regression analysis. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov and UMIN Clinical Trials Registry up to 4 April 2014. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs reporting effects of melatonin on the incidence of emergence agitation in children who underwent general anaesthesia were included. RESULTS: Four studies (358 participants) were analysed. A conventional random-effects meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo, melatonin premedication may be effective in emergence agitation prevention [risk ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.60; I2 = 0%]. However, TSA corrected the 95% CI to 0.07 to 1.47 and showed that 22.5% of the required information size (RIS) was achieved. The effect of melatonin compared with that of midazolam was not statistically significant (risk ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.52) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 36.8%). TSA-adjusted 95% CI could not be calculated because of the small information size (4% of RIS). Meta-regression showed that, compared with midazolam, melatonin dose was significantly correlated with the effect (P = 0.024). The risk ratios (95% CI) of low and high-dose melatonin were 1.02 (0.39 to 2.65) and 0.22 (0.08 to 0.58), respectively. There was no effect of melatonin compared with dexmedetomidine (risk ratio 1.0, 95% CI 0.15 to 6.55). TSA-adjusted 95% CI could not be calculated (0.9% of RIS). CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, melatonin premedication may be effective in preventing emergence agitation in children (GRADE: low). This TSA suggests that further studies are required to confirm the results. Compared with midazolam, high-dose melatonin might have a significant effect in preventing emergence agitation (GRADE: very low). The study protocol was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: UMIN000011841).
BACKGROUND:Emergence agitation is a common phenomenon in children recovering from general anaesthesia. An emergence agitation reaction increases the risk of injuring the surgical repair, the patient and the caregivers. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the efficacy of melatonin premedication in emergence agitation prevention. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with trial sequential analysis (TSA) and meta-regression analysis. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov and UMIN Clinical Trials Registry up to 4 April 2014. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: RCTs reporting effects of melatonin on the incidence of emergence agitation in children who underwent general anaesthesia were included. RESULTS: Four studies (358 participants) were analysed. A conventional random-effects meta-analysis showed that compared with placebo, melatonin premedication may be effective in emergence agitation prevention [risk ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.60; I2 = 0%]. However, TSA corrected the 95% CI to 0.07 to 1.47 and showed that 22.5% of the required information size (RIS) was achieved. The effect of melatonin compared with that of midazolam was not statistically significant (risk ratio 0.48, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.52) with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 36.8%). TSA-adjusted 95% CI could not be calculated because of the small information size (4% of RIS). Meta-regression showed that, compared with midazolam, melatonin dose was significantly correlated with the effect (P = 0.024). The risk ratios (95% CI) of low and high-dose melatonin were 1.02 (0.39 to 2.65) and 0.22 (0.08 to 0.58), respectively. There was no effect of melatonin compared with dexmedetomidine (risk ratio 1.0, 95% CI 0.15 to 6.55). TSA-adjusted 95% CI could not be calculated (0.9% of RIS). CONCLUSION: Compared with placebo, melatonin premedication may be effective in preventing emergence agitation in children (GRADE: low). This TSA suggests that further studies are required to confirm the results. Compared with midazolam, high-dose melatonin might have a significant effect in preventing emergence agitation (GRADE: very low). The study protocol was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: UMIN000011841).
Authors: Katie Mellor; Diana Papaioannou; Anna Thomason; Robert Bolt; Chris Evans; Matthew Wilson; Chris Deery Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2022-02-24 Impact factor: 2.125
Authors: Pawel P Posadzki; Ram Bajpai; Bhone Myint Kyaw; Nicola J Roberts; Amnon Brzezinski; George I Christopoulos; Ushashree Divakar; Shweta Bajpai; Michael Soljak; Gerard Dunleavy; Krister Jarbrink; Ei Ei Khaing Nang; Chee Kiong Soh; Josip Car Journal: BMC Med Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 8.775