Literature DB >> 26225267

Using Concept Mapping in the Development of a School of Public Health.

Laura J Hsu1, Misty Y Pacheco1, Christopher Crabtree1, Jay E Maddock1.   

Abstract

Schools of Public Health have a wide variety of essential stakeholders. Broad input in program planning should assist in ensuring well-developed plans and strong community buy-in. The planning of a school can better address the needs of multiple stakeholders from systematic broad-based input from these constituents using concept mapping. In this study, we used concept mapping to prioritize a set of recommendations from diverse stakeholders to assist in the process of planning a school. A set of statements was generated on essential elements for the proposed school from a broad group of stakeholders. The statements were then distilled into unique themes, which were then rated on importance and feasibility. Cluster maps and pattern matches were used to analyze the ratings. Unique themes (N = 147) were identified and grouped into 12 clusters. Cluster themes included leadership, faculty, culture, school, and curriculum. Pattern matches revealed a significant, modest correlation between importance and feasibility (r = 0.27). A broad range of perspectives was used to identify relevant areas to address in the development of a school.

Keywords:  academic program planning; concept mapping; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26225267      PMCID: PMC4507361     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health        ISSN: 2165-8242


  8 in total

1.  Reinventing the field training experience: building a practical and effective graduate program at the UCLA School of Public Health.

Authors:  K L Chickering; T Malik; R J Halbert; S B Kar
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Planning professional education at schools of public health.

Authors:  K Kahn; S M Tollman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Engaging key stakeholders to assess and improve the professional preparation of MPH health educators.

Authors:  Laura A Linnan; Allan Steckler; Suzanne Maman; Meg Ellenson; Elizabeth French; Lynn Blanchard; Mike Bowling; Nina Yamanis; Stacey Succop; Amy Davenport; Beth Moracco
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Development of public health priorities for end-of-life initiatives.

Authors:  Jaya K Rao; Jeanne Alongi; Lynda A Anderson; Larry Jenkins; George-Ann Stokes; Mary Kane
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Environmental and policy approaches for promoting physical activity in the United States: a research agenda.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Cheryl M Kelly; Amy A Eyler; Cheryl Carnoske; Lisa Grost; Susan L Handy; Jay E Maddock; Delores Pluto; Brian A Ritacco; James F Sallis; Thomas L Schmid
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2008-07

6.  Building and sustaining a multiuniversity and multicampus program or school of public health.

Authors:  Michael R Greenberg; Audrey Gotsch; George Rhoads; Dona Schneider
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Creating a virtual research community: the University of Arizona PhD program.

Authors:  Judith A Effken; Joyceen S Boyle; Marjorie A Isenberg
Journal:  J Prof Nurs       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Transforming a Master of Public Health program to address public health practice needs.

Authors:  Lynn D Woodhouse; Alberto C Cardelle; Steven W Godin; Steven E Shive; Tonya L Williams; Elizabeth A Brensinger; Adenike C Bitto
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.