Literature DB >> 26225049

A Study on the Influence of the Osteotomy Slope on Bony Changes after Advancement Genioplasty.

Ajay Chandran1, M R Muthusekhar2, S Nachiappan1, G D Nandini1, S Tharanikumar1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The slope of the osteotomy used for the genioplasty dictates the vertical change. The horizontal bony changes after advancement genioplasty are not identical to the intercortical bony changes, because the variety of osteotomy slopes result in different vertical changes. MATERIAL AND
METHODOLOGY: Ten of these patients had additional osteotomies as follows: five maxillary, three mandibular and two both maxillary and mandibular. Pre-operative and post-operative (at least 6 months) lateral cephalograms were retrospectively analyzed to assess horizontal and vertical movements of the chin. The following landmarks were used, Hard tissue pogonion (Pog), Occlusal plane (OPL), Menton (Me), Menton plane (MePL). The following parameters were calculated: ΔH = H-H, ΔV = V-V, The ratio between ΔH and ΔV equals tangent α, Calculated α = inverse tangent α .
RESULTS: The Mean Horizontal bony movements was 3.75 mm (SD 1.4 mm, range -6 to 15 mm). The Mean Vertical bony movements was 1.4 mm (SD 0.8 mm, range 0.5-2 mm). The Mean Measured Osteotomy slope angle was 82.2 (SD 7.4, range 75-91). The Calculated Mean Slope Angle based on the ΔH/ΔV ratio was 82.3 (SD 7.0, range 74-95). DISCUSSION: The slope of the osteotomy used for the genioplasty dictates the vertical change. The osteotomy slope angle was defined as the angle between the osteotomy and a line perpendicular to the occlusal plane. The measured angle was compared with the calculated angle deduced from the horizontal and vertical genial post-operative changes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genioplasty; Osteotomy; Soft tissue changes

Year:  2014        PMID: 26225049      PMCID: PMC4511904          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-014-0712-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  9 in total

1.  Soft tissue response to genioplasty procedures.

Authors:  L Krekmanov; K E Kahnberg
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.651

2.  Advancement genioplasty: a retrospective cephalometric analysis of osseous and soft tissue changes.

Authors:  J P McDonnell; R W McNeill; R A West
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1977-08

3.  President's page.

Authors:  W H Bell; J J Dann
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1973-08

4.  Assessment of chin surgery by a coordinate free method.

Authors:  A F Ayoub; D R Stirrups; K F Moos
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Hard and soft tissue predictability with advancement genioplasties.

Authors:  J E Van Sickels; C V Smith; B D Tiner; D L Jones
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1994-03

6.  Evaluation of changes following advancement genioplasty using finite element analysis.

Authors:  A F Ayoub; D R Stirrups; K F Moos
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.651

7.  A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.

Authors:  R A Holdaway
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-04

8.  The influence of the osteotomy slope on bony changes after advancement genioplasty.

Authors:  Y Shoshani; G Chaushu; S Taicher
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 9.  A retrospective study of advancement genioplasty.

Authors:  H S Park; E Ellis; R J Fonseca; S T Reynolds; K H Mayo
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1989-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.