Literature DB >> 26225033

A Prospective Study on Management of Mandibular Angle Fracture.

Pradeep Pattar1, Sujith Shetty2, Saikrishna Degala2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of management of mandibular angle fracture by open reduction and internal fixation using single non compression miniplate via transbuccal, intraoral or extraoral approaches. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 30 patients were randomly selected regardless of age, sex requiring open reduction and internal fixation of non comminuted angle fracture with/or without other associated fractures of the mandible. All the patients were operated under general anaesthesia following routine haematological, biochemical, general physical examination and routine radiographic examination. Patients were randomly distributed into 3 groups namely: (1) intraoral, (2) transbuccal, and (3) extraoral groups depending on the surgical approach used for open reduction and internal fixation of fracture of the angle of mandible. In the intraoral group (12 patients), angle fracture was approached through the intraoral vestibular incision similar to sagittal split incision. In the transbuccal group (8 patients), angle fracture was approached through the intraoral vestibular incision and transbuccal stab incision for screw fixation via trochar. In the extraoral group (10 patients), angle fracture was approached through the Risdon's submandibular incision. In all the patients, fractures were reduced with upper and lower Erich's arch bar fixation as means for IMF intraoperatively. In all the patients, fracture of the angle of the mandible was fixed with single non compression 2.5 mm, 4 holed with gap stainless steel miniplate and 6/8 mm monocortical screws. All patients were followed up for minimum of 6 months to maximum of 24 months.
RESULTS: Complications were relatively minor such as paresthesia (on average 26.7 % first post-operative day which was gradually improved and on average after 1 month was 3.3 %), mild to moderate occlusal discrepancies (on average 36.7 %) which needed the post-operative intermaxillary fixation with elastics for 1-2 weeks, infection (20 % on average) was mild to moderate which was managed with antibiotic therapy and/or incision and drainage except in one case, plate removal was done under general anaesthesia (extraoral group) because of recurrent infection. Post-operative pain was mild to moderate (mean VAS score pre operative-6.17, post-operative 1 week-1.63) which was managed with analgesics. Mouth opening was recorded in all patients which was on average 20.98 mm preoperatively which improved to 40.57 mm after 1 month.
CONCLUSION: The use of a single non compression miniplate for fractures of the angle of the mandible is a simple, reliable technique with relatively rare major complications and few minor complications irrespective of the surgical approach used for the open reduction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Angle fracture; Extraoral; Intraoral; Miniplate; Transbuccal

Year:  2013        PMID: 26225033      PMCID: PMC4518788          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-013-0542-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  9 in total

1.  Treatment modalities for mandibular angle fractures.

Authors:  Andrew J L Gear; Elena Apasova; John P Schmitz; Warren Schubert
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Do mandibular third molars alter the risk of angle fracture?

Authors:  James C Fuselier; Edward E Ellis; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Morbidity associated with extraoral open reduction of mandibular fractures.

Authors:  W F Wagner; D C Neal; B Alpert
Journal:  J Oral Surg       Date:  1979-02

4.  Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using one noncompression miniplate.

Authors:  E Ellis; L R Walker
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 5.  Treatment methods for fractures of the mandibular angle.

Authors:  E Ellis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 6.  Intraoral monocortical miniplating of mandible fractures.

Authors:  J Valentino; F E Levy; L J Marentette
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-06

7.  Treatment of mandibular angle fractures using two noncompression miniplates.

Authors:  E Ellis; L Walker
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Mandibular third molars and angle fractures.

Authors:  David R Halmos; Edward Ellis; Thomas B Dodson
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Transoral plating of mandibular angle fractures: a technique.

Authors:  G J Nishioka; J E Van Sickels
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol       Date:  1988-11
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  A Comparative Evaluation of Transbuccal versus Transoral Approach for the Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures: A Prospective, Clinical, and Radiographic Study.

Authors:  Kritika Sehrawat; Bhavna Malik; H V Vallabha; Amrutham Bhavya Vaishnavi; Siva Kumar Pendyala; Mohammed Ibrahim; Fatima Abdullah Binyahya
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

2.  Photoelastic analysis of conventional and locking system for treatment of mandibular angle fractures with a single plate.

Authors:  Danilo-Louzada de Oliveira; Victor-Eduardo de Souza-Batista; Letícia Holobenko; Joel-Ferreira Santiago-Junior; Eduardo-Piza Pellizzer; Paulo-Domingos Ribeiro-Junior
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 3.  A Comparative Study of Transbuccal and Extraoral Approaches in the Management of Mandibular Angle Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sabah Ali Beza; Sayed Attia; Edward Ellis; Layla Omara
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2016-09-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.