Literature DB >> 26224920

Gamma background measurements in the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane.

Dariusz Malczewski1, Jan Kisiel2, Jerzy Dorda2.   

Abstract

In situ gamma-ray measurements were taken at six locations in the Modane Underground Laboratory. Count rates for gamma radiation within the energy range of 7-2734 keV varied from 15 to 108 γs-1. The arithmetic mean was 79 γs-1 for measurements taken without a collimator. The metamorphic rocks surrounding the Lab are characterized by low activity concentrations of uranium and thorium equal to 12 and 10 Bq kg-1, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gamma background; Gamma fluxes; Gamma-ray spectrometry; Underground laboratory

Year:  2011        PMID: 26224920      PMCID: PMC4514586          DOI: 10.1007/s10967-011-1497-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radioanal Nucl Chem        ISSN: 0236-5731            Impact factor:   1.371


Introduction

The Modane Underground Laboratory (Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane – LSM) is one of the largest underground research centers in Europe. The Laboratory is located in the highway tunnel connecting France and Italy, 1,200 m a.s.l. Including main hall and three secondary halls, the total volume and area of the Lab are 3.52 × 103 m3 and 4.1 × 102 m2 [1, 2]. The scientific programs at LSM comprise particle and astroparticle physics, neutrinoless double beta decay, and ultra-low background experiments [3]. As all these experiments represent investigations of extremely rare events the precise determination of the natural radioactivity background level is required [4, 5]. After cosmic rays, the most important sources of background radiation are the decays of primordial radionuclides such as 40K, 232Th, and 238U in rocks, concrete, and the construction materials used in the detectors. The neutrons originating from (α,n) reactions and the spontaneous fission of U and Th are the main sources of background radiation which can imitate some of the expected signals from the experiments. In this paper we present results of in situ gamma-ray measurements in LSM which were performed in 2006, and laboratory measurements of the parent rock and concrete covering the halls.

Materials and methods

The background gamma radiation in LSM was measured in situ using a portable gamma-ray spectrometry workstation (Fig. 1). The GX3020 system consisted of a coaxial HPGe detector (32% efficiency, crystal length 59 mm and diameter 56.6 mm) with a cryostat mounted on a tripod or a special table, a collimator 50 × 180 mm, a multichannel buffer (InSpector 2000 DSP), and a laptop. The detector bias voltage was 4,000 V and the energy resolution was 0.8 keV at 122 keV and 1.7 keV at 1.33 MeV. For the efficiency calibration and determination of radionuclides the ISOCS (In Situ Object Counting Software), LabSOCS (Laboratory Sourceless Calibration Software) and Genie 2000 v.3 software packages were used. The total duration of a single measurement varied from about 19 to 42 h (Table 1).
Fig. 1

Location of in situ measurements

Table 1

Count rates (γ s−1) in particular energy ranges

Location7.4–2734.2 keV7.4–249.8 keV250.2–500.4 keV500.8–1005.2 keV1005.6–1555.8 keV1556.2–2055.8 keV2056.2–2734.2 keV
1 (68799)a 62.24(3)41.4510.506.253.080.610.36
2 (85613)15.12(1)9.282.701.880.940.210.12
3 (84943)31.25(2)19.565.473.751.760.450.25
4 (86363)88.37(3)59.5514.668.754.060.840.51
5 (85852)107.86(4)73.6717.6110.214.701.040.61
6 (151252)57.07(2)36.8110.486.102.720.600.37

Measurements at location 2 and 3 were performed using a collimator

aMeasurement time (s)

Location of in situ measurements Count rates (γ s−1) in particular energy ranges Measurements at location 2 and 3 were performed using a collimator aMeasurement time (s) Samples of calcschist (parent rock) and concrete were collected from the main hall, and several months after collection they were measured using the same GX3020 HPGe detector in a lead and copper shield (60 mm). The spectrometer energy was calibrated using homogeneously dispersed 241Am, 109Cd, 139Ce, 57Co, 60Co, 137Cs, 113Sn, 85Sr, 88Y and 203Hg radioisotopes in a silicone resin (certificate source type Marinelli Beaker Standard Source [MBSS], supplied by the Czech Metrological Institute). The measurements were done at the Laboratory of Natural Radioactivity (Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia).

Location of in situ measurements

Measurement location 1 was chosen in front of the NEMO 3 experiment (Fig. 1, location 1). The end cap of the detector was 90 cm above the concrete base, 3.7 m away from the NEMO 3 construction and 5.40 m from the side wall. Location 2 was the same as the first, except the detector with a collimator was mounted horizontally 1 m from NEMO 3 construction (Fig. 1, location 2). Measurement location 3 was located in the power supply room on the upper level of the Lab. The detector with a collimator was mounted horizontally directly near the wall and 90 cm above the floor (Fig. 1, location 3). Measurement location 4 was located in the gamma detectors’ hall (Fig. 1, location 4). The detector was mounted 90 cm above the floor, 2.8 m from the side walls and 9 m away from the entrance to the hall. Location 5 was the same as 4, except the detector was mounted horizontally directly near the wall and 90 cm above the floor (Fig. 1, location 5). The last measuring point (location 6) was on a metal platform in front of the NEMO 3 experiment. The detector was mounted horizontally 90 cm above the platform and 5 m away from the NEMO 3 construction (Fig. 1, location 6). The gamma-ray spectra from all locations are presented in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

In situ gamma-ray spectra at specified locations. The characteristic gamma-ray emitters are marked above the corresponding peaks

In situ gamma-ray spectra at specified locations. The characteristic gamma-ray emitters are marked above the corresponding peaks

Results and discussion

The count rates (γ s−1) at all measurement locations are listed in Table 1, and the gamma fluxes in γ cm−2 s−1 from locations 2 and 3 are given in Table 2. The count rates in the main gamma peaks and the gamma fluxes from these peaks at locations 2 and 3 are presented in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Table 5 summarizes the results of the activity measurements in the parent rock and in concrete from the main hall.
Table 2

Gamma fluxes in γ cm−2 s−1 in specified energy ranges at location 2 and 3

Location7.4–2734.2 keV7.4–249.8 keV250.2–500.4 keV500.8–1005.2 keV1005.6–1555.8 keV1556.2–2055.8 keV2056.2–2734.2 keV
20.3010.1855.36 × 10−2 3.74 × 10−2 1.87 × 10−2 4.10 × 10−3 2.40 × 10−3
30.6220.3890.1097.47 × 10−2 3.51 × 10−2 8.89 × 10−3 5.01 × 10−3
Table 3

Count rates (γs−1) in the main gamma peaks

Location351.9 keV 214Pb (238U)1.22 keVa 609.3 keV 214Bi (238U)1.41 keV911.6 keV 228Ac (232Th)1.56 keV1460.8 keV 40K1.87 keV2204.2 keV 214Bi (238U)2.17 keV2614.5 keV 208Tl (232Th)2.44 keV
10.496b 0.4020.1050.4560.0320.074
20.1060.0900.0310.1200.0100.024
30.3030.2640.0660.1790.0230.050
40.7310.6010.1500.4660.0450.103
51.0140.8120.1840.6000.0580.125
60.4480.3610.0970.3320.0300.075

Measurements at locations 2 and 3 were performed using a collimator

aFull width at half maximum (FWHM)

bEstimated uncertainty of peak areas ≤ 5%

Table 4

Gamma fluxes in γ cm−2 s−1 from the main gamma peaks, at locations 2 and 3

Location351.9 keV 214Pb (238U)1.22 keVa 609.3 keV 214Bi (238U)1.41 keV911.6 keV 228Ac (232Th)1.56 keV1460.8 keV 40K1.87 keV2204.2 keV 214Bi (238U)2.17 keV2614.5 keV 208Tl (232Th)2.44 keV
22.10 × 10−3 1.78 × 10−3 6.10 × 10−4 2.40 × 10−3 2.02 × 10−4 4.78 × 10−4
36.04 × 10−3 5.26 × 10−3 1.31 × 10−3 3.55 × 10−3 4.53 × 10−4 1.00 × 10−3

aFull width at half maximum (FWHM)

bEstimated uncertainty of peak areas ≤ 5%

Table 5

Calcschist and concrete 40K, 232Th and 238U concentrations

Calcschist (parent rock)
 40K (Bqkg−1) 232Th (Bq kg−1) 238U (Bq kg−1)
 182(4)10.2(5)11.8(6)
 K(10−6 gg−1) 232Th (10−6 gg−1) 238U (10−6 gg−1)
 0.71(1)2.48(12)0.95(5)
Concrete
 40K (Bq kg−1) 232Th (Bq kg−1) 238U (Bq kg−1)
 91(3)6.7(2)22.8(7)
 K(10−6 gg−1) 232Th (10−6 gg−1) 238U (10−6 gg−1)
 0.36(1)1.63(5)1.83(3)
Gamma fluxes in γ cm−2 s−1 in specified energy ranges at location 2 and 3 Count rates (γs−1) in the main gamma peaks Measurements at locations 2 and 3 were performed using a collimator aFull width at half maximum (FWHM) bEstimated uncertainty of peak areas ≤ 5% Gamma fluxes in γ cm−2 s−1 from the main gamma peaks, at locations 2 and 3 aFull width at half maximum (FWHM) bEstimated uncertainty of peak areas ≤ 5% Calcschist and concrete 40K, 232Th and 238U concentrations

In situ measurements

The total count rates between energy range of 7.4–2734.2 keV varied from 15 at location 2 to ~108 γ s−1 at location 5 (Table 1). The arithmetic mean for measurements without a collimator (locations 1, 4, 5 and 6) was 79(23) γ s−1 (Fig. 3a). As expected the highest count rates were noted between 7.4 and 249.8 keV with an average contribution of 0.65 for all measurement locations (Fig. 3b). The count rates at subsequent energy ranges noticeably decreased, with average contributions of 0.17, 0.11, 0.05, 1.1 × 10−2, and 7 × 10−3 within ranges 250–500, 501–1005, 1,006–1,556, 1,556–2,056, and 2,056–2,734 keV, respectively (Fig. 3b). The lowest count rates (both with and without a collimator) at locations 2 and 6 indicate that the metal elements inside the Lab show the smallest contribution to the total background.
Fig. 3

a Count rates at all locations. Thick solid line – an average count rate from measurements without a collimator (79). b Average contributions of count rates within the particular energy ranges from all locations

a Count rates at all locations. Thick solid line – an average count rate from measurements without a collimator (79). b Average contributions of count rates within the particular energy ranges from all locations For measurements using a collimator (locations 2 and 3) the highest total gamma flux, 0.622 γ cm−2 s−1, was noted at location 3. At location 2 the total gamma flux, 0.301 γ cm−2 s−1, was two times lower than at location 3 (Table 2). Similar to the count rates, the particular contributions of these gamma fluxes rapidly decrease with increasing energy; they are on the order of 10−2 in the range 250–1,556 keV, and 10−3 in the range 1556–2734 keV. The highest integral areas from the main gamma transitions (except point 2) were noted under the peak at 351.9 keV (214Pb) and then under the peaks at 609.3 (214Bi) and 1460.8 keV (40K) (Table 3). The two most intense gamma transitions from thorium series i.e., 911.6 keV (228Ac) and 2614.5 keV (208Tl) are characterized by reduced areas compared with lines of 351.9, 609.3 and 1460.8 keV. The gamma transition of 2204.2 keV from 214Bi is characterized by the lowest count rates ranging from 0.03 γ s−1 at location 6 to 0.06 γ s−1 at location 5 (measurements without a collimator). Despite the low yield (1.28%) of the 2,204.2 keV transition [6], its contribution may be important to geo-neutrino experiments because its possible overlap with the deuteron binding energy of 2.2 MeV [7]. This energy is released as gamma rays as a result of inverse beta-decay in a liquid scintillator. Gamma fluxes at locations 2 and 3 (measurements with a collimator) are on the order of 10−3 γ cm−2 s−1 for the peaks at 351.9, 609.3 and 1460.8 keV, and on the order of 10−4 γ cm−2 s−1 for the peaks at 911.6, 2204.2 and 2614.5 keV (Table 4). The gamma rays emitted from calibration sources as 137Cs (peak 661.6 keV) and 60Co (peaks 1,173.2 and 1,332.5 keV) [8] are visible in the spectra at locations 1, 4, 5 and 6. The count rates in these peaks varied from 0.071 (location 6) to 0.088 γ s−1 (locations 1 and 5), and 0.064 (location 6) to 0.305 γ s−1 (location 4) for 137Cs and 60Co, respectively. The values for 60Co are given as the sum of peaks 1173.2 and 1332.5 keV.

Laboratory measurements

The results of the activity measurements for calcschist (Fig. 4) and concrete collected from the main hall are given in Table 5. As seen the table, the activity concentration in Bq kg−1 and the concentration in 10−6 gg−1 of 238U is two times higher in concrete than in calcschist, whereas 40K concentrations in Bq kg−1 and 10−6 gg−1 in calcschist is two times higher than in concrete. The activity concentrations of 232Th are comparable (Table 5). Activity concentrations of 40K, 232Th and 238U equal to 213(30), 10.1(8) and 10.4(25) Bq kg−1, respectively, have been reported in calcschist, and concentrations equal to 77(13), 5.8(8) and 23.5(25), respectively, have been noted in concrete in LSM by Chazal et al. (1998) [9]. These values are consistent with the results obtained in our measurements. Generally, the concrete covering walls in LSM shows activity concentrations of 40K, 232Th and 238U comparable with concentrations observed for typical limestone concretes i.e., 89, 8.5 and 31 Bq kg−1, respectively [10]. The activity concentrations of 40K, 232Th and 238U directly calculated during in situ measurement (location 3) were 19.7(7), 6.2(2) and 80(1) Bq kg−1, respectively. These results indicate that the most important sources of gamma background inside the Lab are decays of primordial radionuclides in limestone concrete that covers the parent rock.
Fig. 4

a A photograph of calcschist sample used in this study. b Corresponding gamma-ray spectrum; the characteristic gamma-ray emitters are marked above the corresponding peaks

a A photograph of calcschist sample used in this study. b Corresponding gamma-ray spectrum; the characteristic gamma-ray emitters are marked above the corresponding peaks

Conclusions

The gamma background inside the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane is low and characterized by count rates at the level of 79 γ s−1 in the energy range of 7–2734 keV. Gamma fluxes obtained from two locations were 0.301 and 0.622 γ cm−2 s−1. The construction materials inside the Lab do not contribute significantly to the total gamma background.
  2 in total

1.  A very low background HPGe detector operating deep underground at 4800 m water equivalent.

Authors:  Lino Miramonti
Journal:  Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Ultra-low background measurements of decayed aerosol filters.

Authors:  Craig Aalseth; Erica Andreotti; Dirk Arnold; Joan-Albert Sanchez Cabeza; Detlev Degering; Andrea Giuliani; Raquel Gonzales de Orduña; Rodolfo Gurriaran; Mikael Hult; Martin Keillor; Matthias Laubenstein; Gilbert le Petit; Romul Mircea Margineanu; Murray Matthews; Harry Miley; Iolanda Osvath; Monica Pellicciari; Wolfango Plastino; Hardy Simgen; Marc Weber; Robert Werzi
Journal:  J Radioanal Nucl Chem       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 1.371

  2 in total
  3 in total

1.  Simulating the Impact of the Natural Radiation Background on Bacterial Systems: Implications for Very Low Radiation Biological Experiments.

Authors:  Nathanael Lampe; David G Biron; Jeremy M C Brown; Sébastien Incerti; Pierre Marin; Lydia Maigne; David Sarramia; Hervé Seznec; Vincent Breton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Gamma background measurements in the Boulby Underground Laboratory.

Authors:  Dariusz Malczewski; Jan Kisiel; Jerzy Dorda
Journal:  J Radioanal Nucl Chem       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.371

3.  Lead shielding efficiency from the gamma background measurements in the salt cavern of the Polkowice-Sieroszowice copper mine.

Authors:  Kinga Polaczek-Grelik; Jan Kisiel; Agata Walencik-Łata; Jerzy W Mietelski; Paweł Janowski; Małgorzata Harańczyk; Jan Jurkowski; Agnieszka Zalewska; Jan Kobziński; Paweł Markowski; Andrzej Sadowski
Journal:  J Radioanal Nucl Chem       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 1.371

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.