Literature DB >> 26224790

The Effect of Exit-Site Antibacterial Honey Versus Nasal Mupirocin Prophylaxis on the Microbiology and Outcomes of Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis and Exit-Site Infections: A Sub-Study of the Honeypot Trial.

Lei Zhang1, Sunil V Badve2, Elaine M Pascoe3, Elaine Beller4, Alan Cass5, Carolyn Clark6, Janak de Zoysa7, Nicole M Isbel2, Steven McTaggart8, Alicia T Morrish3, E Geoffrey Playford9, Anish Scaria3, Paul Snelling10, Liza A Vergara3, Carmel M Hawley2, David W Johnson11.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: ♦
BACKGROUND: The HONEYPOT study recently reported that daily exit-site application of antibacterial honey was not superior to nasal mupirocin prophylaxis for preventing overall peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related infection. This paper reports a secondary outcome analysis of the HONEYPOT study with respect to exit-site infection (ESI) and peritonitis microbiology, infectious hospitalization and technique failure. ♦
METHODS: A total of 371 PD patients were randomized to daily exit-site application of antibacterial honey plus usual exit-site care (N = 186) or intranasal mupirocin prophylaxis (in nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriers only) plus usual exit-site care (control, N = 185). Groups were compared on rates of organism-specific ESI and peritonitis, peritonitis- and infection-associated hospitalization, and technique failure (PD withdrawal). ♦
RESULTS: The mean peritonitis rates in the honey and control groups were 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32 - 0.50) and 0.41 (95% CI 0.33 - 0.49) episodes per patient-year, respectively (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.01, 95% CI 0.75 - 1.35). When specific causative organisms were examined, no differences were observed between the groups for gram-positive (IRR 0.99, 95% CI 0.66 - 1.49), gram-negative (IRR 0.71, 95% CI 0.39 - 1.29), culture-negative (IRR 2.01, 95% CI 0.91 - 4.42), or polymicrobial peritonitis (IRR 1.08, 95% CI 0.36 - 3.20). Exit-site infection rates were 0.37 (95% CI 0.28 - 0.45) and 0.33 (95% CI 0.26 - 0.40) episodes per patient-year for the honey and control groups, respectively (IRR 1.12, 95% CI 0.81 - 1.53). No significant differences were observed between the groups for gram-positive (IRR 1.10, 95% CI 0.70 - 1.72), gram-negative (IRR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.46 - 1.58), culture-negative (IRR 1.88, 95% CI 0.67 - 5.29), or polymicrobial ESI (IRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.40 - 2.54). Times to first peritonitis-associated and first infection-associated hospitalization were similar in the honey and control groups. The rates of technique failure (PD withdrawal) due to PD-related infection were not significantly different between the groups. ♦
CONCLUSION: Compared with standard nasal mupirocin prophylaxis, daily topical exit-site application of antibacterial honey resulted in comparable rates of organism-specific peritonitis and ESI, infection-associated hospitalization, and infection-associated technique failure in PD patients.
Copyright © 2015 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Honey; exit-site infection; hospitalization; microbiology; mupirocin; peritoneal dialysis related infection; peritonitis; technique failure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26224790      PMCID: PMC4690626          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  46 in total

1.  The sensitivity to honey of Gram-positive cocci of clinical significance isolated from wounds.

Authors:  R A Cooper; P C Molan; K G Harding
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.772

2.  Increasing mupirocin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in CAPD--should it continue to be used as prophylaxis?

Authors:  John M Conly; Stephen Vas
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 3.  ISPD position statement on reducing the risks of peritoneal dialysis-related infections.

Authors:  Beth Piraino; Judith Bernardini; Edwina Brown; Ana Figueiredo; David W Johnson; Wai-Choong Lye; Valerie Price; Santhanam Ramalakshmi; Cheuk-Chun Szeto
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Recent peritonitis associates with mortality among patients treated with peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Neil Boudville; Anna Kemp; Philip Clayton; Wai Lim; Sunil V Badve; Carmel M Hawley; Stephen P McDonald; Kathryn J Wiggins; Kym M Bannister; Fiona G Brown; David W Johnson
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Culture-negative peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients in Australia: predictors, treatment, and outcomes in 435 cases.

Authors:  Magid Fahim; Carmel M Hawley; Stephen P McDonald; Fiona G Brown; Johan B Rosman; Kathryn J Wiggins; Kym M Bannister; David W Johnson
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 8.860

6.  Microbiology and outcomes of peritonitis in Australian peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Joanna R Ghali; Kym M Bannister; Fiona G Brown; Johan B Rosman; Kathryn J Wiggins; David W Johnson; Stephen P McDonald
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Pseudomonas peritonitis in Australia: predictors, treatment, and outcomes in 191 cases.

Authors:  Brian Siva; Carmel M Hawley; Stephen P McDonald; Fiona G Brown; Johan B Rosman; Kathryn J Wiggins; Kym M Bannister; David W Johnson
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Routine use of mupirocin at the peritoneal catheter exit site and mupirocin resistance: still low after 7 years.

Authors:  Thierry Lobbedez; Michael Gardam; Helen Dedier; Dorothy Burdzy; Maggie Chu; Sharon Izatt; Joanne M Bargman; Sarbjit V Jassal; Stephen Vas; James Brunton; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Differing outcomes of gram-positive and gram-negative peritonitis.

Authors:  L Troidle; N Gorban-Brennan; A Kliger; F Finkelstein
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 10.  Systematic review of the use of honey as a wound dressing.

Authors:  O A Moore; L A Smith; F Campbell; K Seers; H J McQuay; R A Moore
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2001-06-04       Impact factor: 3.659

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Continuous Quality Improvement Initiatives to Sustainably Reduce Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Infections in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Melissa Nataatmadja; Yeoungjee Cho; David W Johnson
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Catheter-related infections in peritoneal dialysis: comparison of a single center results and the literature data.

Authors:  Sabrina Milan Manani; Grazia Maria Virzì; Anna Giuliani; Carlo Crepaldi; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.902

Review 3.  Antimicrobial agents for preventing peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients.

Authors:  Denise Campbell; David W Mudge; Jonathan C Craig; David W Johnson; Allison Tong; Giovanni Fm Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-08

4.  In vitro Evaluation of Medihoney Antibacterial Wound Gel as an Anti-biofilm Agent Against Ventricular Assist Device Driveline Infections.

Authors:  Yue Qu; David McGiffin; Christina Kure; Janelle McLean; Courtney Duncan; Anton Y Peleg
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 5.  Antimicrobial approaches in the prevention of Staphylococcus aureus infections: a review.

Authors:  D P R Troeman; D Van Hout; J A J W Kluytmans
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.790

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.