Literature DB >> 26224567

Hydrodynamic drag constrains head enlargement for mouthbrooding in cichlids.

Sam Van Wassenbergh1, Nuno Zavattieri Potes2, Dominique Adriaens2.   

Abstract

Presumably as an adaptation for mouthbrooding, many cichlid fish species have evolved a prominent sexual dimorphism in the adult head. Since the head of fishes serves as a bow during locomotion, an evolutionary increase in head volume to brood more eggs can trade-off with the hydrodynamic efficiency of swimming. Here, the differences between males and females in three-dimensional shape and size of the external head surfaces and the effect thereof on drag force during locomotion was analysed for the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), a maternal mouthbrooder. To do so, three-dimensional body surface reconstructions from laser scans and computational fluid dynamics simulations were performed. After scaling the scanned specimens to post-cranial body volume, in order to theoretically equalize propulsive power, the external volume of the head of females was 27% larger than that of males (head length + 14%; head width + 9%). These differences resulted in an approximate 15% increase in drag force. Yet, hydrodynamics imposed important constraints on the adaptation for mouthbrooding as a much more drastic drop in swimming efficiency seems avoided by mainly enlarging the head along the swimming direction.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  drag reduction; fish; head shape; sexual dimorphism; streamlining; swimming

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26224567      PMCID: PMC4535412          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  10 in total

1.  Origin of the superflock of cichlid fishes from Lake Victoria, East Africa.

Authors:  Erik Verheyen; Walter Salzburger; Jos Snoeks; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  To feed or to breed: morphological constraints of mouthbrooding in coral reef cardinalfishes.

Authors:  Andrew S Hoey; David R Bellwood; Adam Barnett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Do constructional constraints influence cichlid craniofacial diversification?

Authors:  C D Hulsey; M C Mims; J T Streelman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Multiple fitness peaks on the adaptive landscape drive adaptive radiation in the wild.

Authors:  Christopher H Martin; Peter C Wainwright
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Integration and evolution of the cichlid mandible: the molecular basis of alternate feeding strategies.

Authors:  R Craig Albertson; J Todd Streelman; Thomas D Kocher; Pamela C Yelick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mouthbreeding in fishes.

Authors:  J R Oppenheimer
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1970-08       Impact factor: 2.844

7.  Chemical communication, aggression, and conspecific recognition in the fish Nile tilapia.

Authors:  P C Giaquinto; G L Volpato
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1997-12

8.  Breathing with a mouth full of eggs: respiratory consequences of mouthbrooding in cardinalfish.

Authors:  Sara Ostlund-Nilsson; Göran E Nilsson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sexual dimorphism and population divergence in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid fish genus Tropheus.

Authors:  Juergen Herler; Michaela Kerschbaumer; Philipp Mitteroecker; Lisbeth Postl; Christian Sturmbauer
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  Dealing with food and eggs in mouthbrooding cichlids: structural and functional trade-offs in fitness related traits.

Authors:  Tim Tkint; Erik Verheyen; Barbara De Kegel; Philippe Helsen; Dominique Adriaens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Intrasexual competition enhances reproductive isolation between locally adapted populations.

Authors:  David Bierbach; Lenin Arias-Rodriguez; Martin Plath
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.624

2.  Why do placentas evolve? Evidence for a morphological advantage during pregnancy in live-bearing fish.

Authors:  Mike Fleuren; Elsa M Quicazan-Rubio; Johan L van Leeuwen; Bart J A Pollux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Unimodal head-width distribution of the European eel (Anguilla anguilla L.) from the Zeeschelde does not support disruptive selection.

Authors:  Pieterjan Verhelst; Jens De Meyer; Jan Reubens; Johan Coeck; Peter Goethals; Tom Moens; Ans Mouton
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Differences in the fast muscle methylome provide insight into sex-specific epigenetic regulation of growth in Nile tilapia during early stages of domestication.

Authors:  Tomasz Podgorniak; Sven Brockmann; Ioannis Konstantinidis; Jorge M O Fernandes
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-05-25       Impact factor: 4.528

5.  A functional trade-off between trophic adaptation and parental care predicts sexual dimorphism in cichlid fish.

Authors:  Fabrizia Ronco; Marius Roesti; Walter Salzburger
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Sex and male breeding state predict intraspecific trait variation in mouth-brooding fishes.

Authors:  Janine E Abecia; Osmar J Luiz; David A Crook; Sam C Banks; Dion Wedd; Alison J King
Journal:  J Fish Biol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.504

7.  Evolutionary divergence in life history traits among populations of the Lake Malawi cichlid fish Astatotilapia calliptera.

Authors:  Paul J Parsons; Jon R Bridle; Lukas Rüber; Martin J Genner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.