Anne-Sophie Junghanns1, Susan Wittig1, Caroline Woehlecke1, Thomas Lehmann2, Clemens Arndt1, Bernd Gruhn3. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. 2. Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences and Documentation, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany. bernd.gruhn@med.uni-jena.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Wilms tumor gene single nucleotide polymorphism (WT1 SNP) rs16754 has been described as a favorable risk marker in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Subsequent studies revealed inconsistent results in both adult and pediatric patients. We analyzed its impact on clinical outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for the first time. METHODS: WT1 SNP rs16754 of 158 children with ALL treated according to ALL Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster treatment trials from 1990 to 2009 and 43 hematopoietic stem cell donors was analyzed by allelic discrimination. WT1 SNP status was correlated with disease characteristics and clinical outcome comparing SNP (WT1(GG/AG)) and wildtype (WT1(AA)). RESULTS: At least one minor allele was found in 23.4 % of patients and 34.9 % of donors (P = 0.07). Distribution of patient and disease characteristics was similar between WT1(GG/AG) and WT1(AA). In multivariate analyses, WT1 SNP was an independent good prognostic marker for cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR WT1(AA) vs. WT1(GG/AG) HR = 3.384, P = 0.021) and event-free survival (EFS; event risk WT1(AA) vs. WT1(GG/AG) HR = 2.503, P = 0.036). Univariate subanalyses of patients who underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation revealed more significant differences in CIR (P = 0.017), EFS (P = 0.012), and overall survival (OS; P = 0.017). Donor's WT1 SNP status did not affect outcome. We found no correlation between WT1 SNP and WT1 expression level at diagnosis (P = 0.634). CONCLUSION: WT1 SNP rs16754 predicts improved CIR and EFS. Outcome differences were more prominent in transplanted children. Our findings identify WT1 SNP rs16754 as a favorable risk marker in pediatric ALL which is independent from known risk factors.
PURPOSE:Wilms tumor gene single nucleotide polymorphism (WT1 SNP) rs16754 has been described as a favorable risk marker in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Subsequent studies revealed inconsistent results in both adult and pediatric patients. We analyzed its impact on clinical outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) for the first time. METHODS:WT1 SNP rs16754 of 158 children with ALL treated according to ALL Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster treatment trials from 1990 to 2009 and 43 hematopoietic stem cell donors was analyzed by allelic discrimination. WT1 SNP status was correlated with disease characteristics and clinical outcome comparing SNP (WT1(GG/AG)) and wildtype (WT1(AA)). RESULTS: At least one minor allele was found in 23.4 % of patients and 34.9 % of donors (P = 0.07). Distribution of patient and disease characteristics was similar between WT1(GG/AG) and WT1(AA). In multivariate analyses, WT1 SNP was an independent good prognostic marker for cumulative incidence of relapse (CIRWT1(AA) vs. WT1(GG/AG) HR = 3.384, P = 0.021) and event-free survival (EFS; event risk WT1(AA) vs. WT1(GG/AG) HR = 2.503, P = 0.036). Univariate subanalyses of patients who underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation revealed more significant differences in CIR (P = 0.017), EFS (P = 0.012), and overall survival (OS; P = 0.017). Donor's WT1 SNP status did not affect outcome. We found no correlation between WT1 SNP and WT1 expression level at diagnosis (P = 0.634). CONCLUSION:WT1 SNP rs16754 predicts improved CIR and EFS. Outcome differences were more prominent in transplanted children. Our findings identify WT1 SNP rs16754 as a favorable risk marker in pediatric ALL which is independent from known risk factors.
Authors: Iris H I M Hollink; Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink; Martin Zimmermann; Brian V Balgobind; Susan T C J M Arentsen-Peters; Marielle Alders; Andre Willasch; Gert-Jan J L Kaspers; Jan Trka; Andre Baruchel; Ursula Creutzig; Rob Pieters; Dirk Reinhardt; C Michel Zwaan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: L Boublikova; M Kalinova; J Ryan; F Quinn; A O'Marcaigh; O Smith; P Browne; J Stary; S R McCann; J Trka; M Lawler Journal: Leukemia Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: T Yamagami; H Ogawa; H Tamaki; Y Oji; T Soma; Y Oka; T Tatekawa; A Tsuboi; E H Kim; T Akiyama; H Sugiyama Journal: Leuk Res Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 3.156
Authors: K M Call; T Glaser; C Y Ito; A J Buckler; J Pelletier; D A Haber; E A Rose; A Kral; H Yeger; W H Lewis Journal: Cell Date: 1990-02-09 Impact factor: 41.582