Literature DB >> 26224393

Evolving Techniques to Improve Radial/Ulnar Artery Access: Crossover Rate of 0.3% in 1,000 Consecutive Patients Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization and/or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via the Wrist.

Frederic Baumann1, Jonathan S Roberts2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate several techniques to reduce crossover rates in wrist artery access in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization (CC)/percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: Palpation-guided radial artery (RA) access for CC/PCI is associated with a crossover rate to femoral artery (FA) access in up to 7.6%.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a single-center consecutive series of patients undergoing CC/PCI was performed. After one 0.4 mg sublingual NTG tablet, the RA and UA were assessed by intraprocedural ultrasound imaging to select the more suitable artery for ultrasound-guided access. A tight "knuckle wire" technique using a 0.014 inch Prowater® coronary wire was used to negotiate RA, UA, and brachial loops when a standard wire would not easily cross. Crossover was defined as any reason requiring secondary arterial access from the contralateral arm or FA.
RESULTS: A total of 1,162 consecutive patients treated from January 2012 to April 2014 were evaluated. Primary arterial access from the wrist (RA/UA) was performed in 1,000 (86.1%, RA: 977, UA 23) and planned FA access in 162 patients (13.9%). The overall crossover rate from the wrist was 0.3% as a result of 3/1,000 patients requiring crossover to the contralateral arm (radial loop: n = 1, brachial loop: n = 1, vessel injury: n = 1). No crossover to the FA was necessary. All primary FA access sites were successful.
CONCLUSIONS: Crossover rates of primary wrist artery access to alternative arterial access for CC/PCI can be reduced to less than 1% applying the aforementioned techniques.
© 2015, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26224393     DOI: 10.1111/joic.12213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  4 in total

Review 1.  Ulnar Artery Catheterization: Is This Our Second Access Site or Is It Still Femoral?

Authors:  Mladen I Vidovich
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Distal Radial and Ulnar Arteries: the Alternative Forearm Access.

Authors:  Analkumar Parikh; Kelly Q Jia; Sumeet K Lall; Ravi S Shah; Ian C Gilchrist
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-01-15

3.  Impact of the Use of a Larger Forearm Artery on the Efficacy and Safety of Transradial and Transulnar Access: A Randomized Trial with Preprocedural Ultrasonography.

Authors:  Pawel Lewandowski; Anna Zuk; Tomasz Slomski; Pawel Maciejewski; Bogumil Ramotowski; Andrzej Budaj
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  Efficacy and safety of kaolin-based hemostatic pad vs. standard mechanical compression following transradial and transulnar access for elective coronary angiography and PCI: RAUL trial substudy.

Authors:  Lewandowski Pawel; Gralak-Lachowska Dagmara; Maciejewski Pawel; Ramotowski Bogumil; Budaj Andrzej; Stec Sebastian
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2019-10-26       Impact factor: 2.037

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.