Yun Peng1, Rose Khavari2, Nissrine A Nakib3, Timothy B Boone2, Yingchun Zhang4. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston, 2027 SERC Building, 3605 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX, 77024, USA. 2. Department of Urology, Houston Methodist Hospital and Research Institute, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. 3. Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. 4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cullen College of Engineering, University of Houston, 2027 SERC Building, 3605 Cullen Blvd, Houston, TX, 77024, USA. yzhang94@uh.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to assess the role of individual anatomical structures and their combinations to urethral support function. METHODS: A realistic pelvic model was developed from an asymptomatic female patient's magnetic resonance (MR) images for dynamic biomechanical analysis using the finite element method. Validation was performed by comparing simulation results with dynamic MR imaging observations. Weaknesses of anatomical support structures were simulated by reducing their material stiffness. Urethral mobility was quantified by examining urethral axis excursion from rest to the final state (intra-abdominal pressure = 100 cmH2O). Seven individual support structures and five of their combinations were studied. RESULT: Among seven urethral support structures, we found that weakening the vaginal walls, puborectalis muscle, and pubococcygeus muscle generated the top three largest urethral excursion angles. A linear relationship was found between urethral axis excursions and intra-abdominal pressure. Weakening all three levator ani components together caused a larger weakening effect than the sum of each individually weakened component, indicating a nonlinearly additive pattern. The pelvic floor responded to different weakening conditions distinctly: weakening the vaginal wall developed urethral mobility through the collapsed vaginal canal, while weakening the levator ani showed a more uniform pelvic floor deformation. CONCLUSIONS: The computational modeling and dynamic biomechanical analysis provides a powerful tool to better understand the dynamics of the female pelvis under pressure events. The vaginal walls, puborectalis, and pubococcygeus are the most important individual structures in providing urethral support. The levator ani muscle group provides urethral support in a well-coordinated way with a nonlinearly additive pattern.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to assess the role of individual anatomical structures and their combinations to urethral support function. METHODS: A realistic pelvic model was developed from an asymptomatic female patient's magnetic resonance (MR) images for dynamic biomechanical analysis using the finite element method. Validation was performed by comparing simulation results with dynamic MR imaging observations. Weaknesses of anatomical support structures were simulated by reducing their material stiffness. Urethral mobility was quantified by examining urethral axis excursion from rest to the final state (intra-abdominal pressure = 100 cmH2O). Seven individual support structures and five of their combinations were studied. RESULT: Among seven urethral support structures, we found that weakening the vaginal walls, puborectalis muscle, and pubococcygeus muscle generated the top three largest urethral excursion angles. A linear relationship was found between urethral axis excursions and intra-abdominal pressure. Weakening all three levator ani components together caused a larger weakening effect than the sum of each individually weakened component, indicating a nonlinearly additive pattern. The pelvic floor responded to different weakening conditions distinctly: weakening the vaginal wall developed urethral mobility through the collapsed vaginal canal, while weakening the levator ani showed a more uniform pelvic floor deformation. CONCLUSIONS: The computational modeling and dynamic biomechanical analysis provides a powerful tool to better understand the dynamics of the female pelvis under pressure events. The vaginal walls, puborectalis, and pubococcygeus are the most important individual structures in providing urethral support. The levator ani muscle group provides urethral support in a well-coordinated way with a nonlinearly additive pattern.
Entities:
Keywords:
Finite element method; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pelvic muscle; Stress urinary incontinence; Urethral hypermobility
Authors: J R Fielding; H Dumanli; A G Schreyer; S Okuda; D T Gering; K H Zou; R Kikinis; F A Jolesz Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Riccardo Del Vescovo; Claudia Lucia Piccolo; Nicoletta Della Vecchia; Francesco Giurazza; Roberto Luigi Cazzato; Rosario Francesco Grasso; Bruno Beomonte Zobel Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Mark E Lockhart; Julia R Fielding; Holly E Richter; Linda Brubaker; Caryl G Salomon; Wen Ye; Christiane M Hakim; Clifford Y Wai; Alan H Stolpen; Anne M Weber Journal: Radiology Date: 2008-09-16 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: William S Cobb; Justin M Burns; Kent W Kercher; Brent D Matthews; H James Norton; B Todd Heniford Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2005-09-02 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: G Ghoniem; E Stanford; K Kenton; C Achtari; R Goldberg; T Mascarenhas; M Parekh; K Tamussino; S Tosson; G Lose; E Petri Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2007-11-17
Authors: Nicholas Dias; Yun Peng; Rose Khavari; Nissrine A Nakib; Robert M Sweet; Gerald W Timm; Arthur G Erdman; Timothy B Boone; Yingchun Zhang Journal: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) Date: 2016-11-18 Impact factor: 2.063