Literature DB >> 26224290

CORR Insights: The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Patient-rated Wrist Evaluation Score for Patients With Distal Radius Fractures.

Gereon Schiffer1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 26224290      PMCID： PMC4562935          DOI： 10.1007/s11999-015-4452-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria.

Authors:  John S Schmitt; Richard P Di Fabio
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Minimal clinically important differences of 3 patient-rated outcomes instruments.

Authors:  Amelia A Sorensen; Daniel Howard; Wen Hui Tan; Jeffrey Ketchersid; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Comparative responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome.

Authors:  Jae Kwang Kim; Eun Soo Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.176
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Do we need to suture the pronator quadratus muscle when we do open reduction and internal fixation for fracture of the distal radius.

Authors:  Kaibin Fang; Xiaocong Lin; Xiaolin Liu; Qingfeng Ke; Shaoojian Shi; Zhangsheng Dai
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-07-11       Impact factor: 2.362
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.