Literature DB >> 26223939

Epidural analgesia does not influence anastomotic leakage incidence after open colorectal surgery for cancer: A retrospective study on 1,474 patients.

Federico Piccioni1, Luigi Mariani2, Marta Negri3, Claudia Casiraghi4, Filiberto Belli5, Ermanno Leo5, Martin Langer1,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is a major cause of morbidity after colorectal surgery. Epidural analgesia is the most effective method for postoperative pain relief after major abdominal surgery. Anyhow, its effect on anastomotic leakage rate is still controversial. This study aimed to compare epidural versus intravenous analgesia as risk factor for anastomotic leakage requiring reoperation in patients undergoing open colorectal surgery for cancer.
METHODS: A retrospective study on 1,474 patients was performed. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to study the relation between primary and secondary factors of risk and anastomotic leakage occurrence within 30 days after elective operation.
RESULTS: Overall 30-day anastomotic leakage requiring reoperation was 4.9% (95%CI: 3.8-6.0%). No difference in anastomotic leakage occurrence was observed between the epidural analgesia group and the intravenous analgesia group (Hazard ratio: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.53-1.67%; P = 0.8338). Females had a rate of anastomotic leakage 43% lower than males (P = 0.0301). The diverting stoma resulted to be protective for anastomotic leakage occurrence (P = 0.0052). AL significantly increased postoperative median length of stay but not in-hospital mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia does not influence the AL risk after open colorectal surgery for cancer.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  analgesia; anastomotic leak; cancer; colorectal; epidural; pain; postoperative

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26223939     DOI: 10.1002/jso.23966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  5 in total

1.  The impact of an ostomy on older colorectal cancer patients: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  N M Verweij; M E Hamaker; D D E Zimmerman; Y T van Loon; F van den Bos; A Pronk; I H M Borel Rinkes; A H W Schiphorst
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Epidural analgesia in the era of enhanced recovery: time to rethink its use?

Authors:  Ahmed M Al-Mazrou; James M Kiely; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Integration of pain scores, morphine consumption and demand/delivery ratio to evaluate patient-controlled analgesia: the C-SIA score.

Authors:  Federico Piccioni; Andrea Doronzio; Rossella Brambilla; Marica Melis; Martin Langer
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-02-03

4.  Effect of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain management and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer resection: a retrospective analysis of 3,042 consecutive patients between 2010 and 2015.

Authors:  Liping Wang; Xuan Li; Hong Chen; Jie Liang; Yu Wang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.133

5.  Awake Major Abdominal Surgeries in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  Andrea Romanzi; Nicola Boleso; Giuseppe Di Palma; Davide La Regina; Francesco Mongelli; Maria Milanesi; Antonella Putortì; Fabrizio Rossi; Roberta Scolaro; Michel Zanardo; Alberto Vannelli
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.037

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.