Adebimpe O Obembe1, Janice J Eng2. 1. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. 2. University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada janice.eng@ubc.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that social participation is considered a pivotal outcome of a successful recovery after stroke, there has been little attention on the impact of activities and services on this important domain. OBJECTIVE: To present a systematic review and meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of rehabilitation interventions on social participation after stroke. METHODS: A total of 8 electronic databases were searched for relevant RCTs that evaluated the effects of an intervention on the outcome of social participation after stroke. Reference lists of selected articles were hand searched to identify further relevant studies. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed- and random-effect models. RESULTS: In all, 24 RCTs involving 2042 stroke survivors were identified and reviewed, and 21 were included in the meta-analysis. There was a small beneficial effect of interventions that utilized exercise on social participation (10 studies; SMD = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.09, 0.78;P= .01) immediately after the program ended. Exercise in combination with other interventions (13 studies; SMD = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.10, 0.58;P= .006) also resulted in beneficial effects. No significant effect was observed for interventions that involved support services over 9 studies (SMD = 0.09 [95% CI = -0.04, 0.21];I(2)= 0%;P= .16). CONCLUSIONS: The included studies provide evidence that rehabilitation interventions may be effective in improving social participation after stroke, especially if exercise is one of the components.
BACKGROUND: Despite the fact that social participation is considered a pivotal outcome of a successful recovery after stroke, there has been little attention on the impact of activities and services on this important domain. OBJECTIVE: To present a systematic review and meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of rehabilitation interventions on social participation after stroke. METHODS: A total of 8 electronic databases were searched for relevant RCTs that evaluated the effects of an intervention on the outcome of social participation after stroke. Reference lists of selected articles were hand searched to identify further relevant studies. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using fixed- and random-effect models. RESULTS: In all, 24 RCTs involving 2042 stroke survivors were identified and reviewed, and 21 were included in the meta-analysis. There was a small beneficial effect of interventions that utilized exercise on social participation (10 studies; SMD = 0.43; 95% CI = 0.09, 0.78;P= .01) immediately after the program ended. Exercise in combination with other interventions (13 studies; SMD = 0.34; 95% CI = 0.10, 0.58;P= .006) also resulted in beneficial effects. No significant effect was observed for interventions that involved support services over 9 studies (SMD = 0.09 [95% CI = -0.04, 0.21];I(2)= 0%;P= .16). CONCLUSIONS: The included studies provide evidence that rehabilitation interventions may be effective in improving social participation after stroke, especially if exercise is one of the components.
Authors: Godelief M J Mars; Gertrudis I J M Kempen; Ilse Mesters; Ireen M Proot; Jacques Th M Van Eijk Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2008 Impact factor: 3.033
Authors: Stephen E Nadeau; Samuel S Wu; Bruce H Dobkin; Stanley P Azen; Dorian K Rose; Julie K Tilson; Steven Y Cen; Pamela W Duncan Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Marie-Louise Bird; B William Mortenson; Francis Chu; Nicole Acerra; Eric Bagnall; Angela Wright; Karen Hayley; Jennifer Yao; Janice J Eng Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2019-03-01
Authors: Anna Palumbo; Viswanath Aluru; Jessica Battaglia; Daniel Geller; Alan Turry; Marc Ross; Adrian Cristian; Caitlin Balagula; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Latika Khatri; Moses V Chao; Robert C Froemke; Jacek K Urbanek; Preeti Raghavan Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Fernanda M R M Ferreira; Maria Emília A Chaves; Vinícius C Oliveira; Jordana S R Martins; Claysson B S Vimieiro; Adriana M V N Van Petten Journal: Occup Ther Int Date: 2021-07-31 Impact factor: 1.448
Authors: Anna Norlander; Emma Carlstedt; Ann-Cathrin Jönsson; Eva M Lexell; Agneta Ståhl; Arne Lindgren; Susanne Iwarsson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Joo-Hyun Lee; Ji-Hyuk Park; Yeong Jo Kim; Sang Heon Lee; Marcel W M Post; Hae Yean Park Journal: Occup Ther Int Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 1.448
Authors: Azadeh Barzideh; Susan Marzolini; Cynthia Danells; David Jagroop; Andrew H Huntley; Elizabeth L Inness; Sunita Mathur; George Mochizuki; Paul Oh; Avril Mansfield Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 2.692