Literature DB >> 26223668

[Lymph node dissection after primary surgery and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of rectal cancer. Interim analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study (OCUM)].

M E Kreis1, C A Maurer2, R Ruppert3, H Ptok4, J Strassburg5, T Junginger6, S Merkel7, P Hermanek7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The OCUM trial (NCT01325649) aims to clarify whether low rates of local recurrence are also achieved when the indications for neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy are not based on the clinical TNM staging but on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with measurement of the tumor distance to the circumferential resection margin. In this interim analysis the lymph node status in OCUM patients was investigated as a surrogate parameter for quality of surgery and histopathological work-up.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Until now a total of 560 patients have been included in this study. Total mesorectal excision (TME) without pretreatment was undertaken in 338 patients (60.4 %) and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy was administered in 222 (39.6 %) patients. The histological work-up was performed according to the guidelines of the German Association of Pathologists. Data are given as median values and ranges in brackets.
RESULTS: The lymph node yield was 24 (7-79) in 338 patients undergoing primary TME surgery without pretreatment, while 20 (3-56) lymph nodes were identified in patients after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (p = 0.001). A minimum of 12 lymph nodes were analyzed in 335 out of 338 patients (99.1 %) and in 209 out of 222 patients (94.1 %) following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (p = 0.001). Lymph node metastasis was identified (p = 0.362) in 116 out of 338 patients without pretreatment (34.3 %) and in 71 out of 222 patients after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy (32.0 %). Patient age did not influence the number of identified lymph nodes or rate of lymph node metastasis.
CONCLUSION: In this trial the number of identified lymph nodes suggests that the quality of surgery and histopathological work-up were adequate compared to the standards defined by national guidelines. Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy led to a reduced lymph node yield compared to surgery without pretreatment; however, this did not influence the rate of lymph node metastasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Local recurrence rate; Lymph node analysis; Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging; Resection margin; TNM classification

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26223668     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-015-0062-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  25 in total

Review 1.  The importance of accurate pathological assessment of lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J B Schofield; N A Mounter; R Mallett; N Y Haboubi
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Quality management in rectal carcinoma: what is feasible?

Authors:  Susanne Merkel; Daniela Klossek; Jonas Göhl; Thomas Papadopoulos; Werner Hohenberger; Paul Hermanek
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Postoperative intra-arterial methylene blue injection of colorectal cancer specimens increases the number of lymph nodes recovered.

Authors:  Alexander Törnroos; Ivan Shabo; Bengt Druvefors; Gunnar Arbman; Hans Olsson
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 5.087

4.  The prognostic value of lymph node ratio in a population-based collective of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Robert Rosenberg; Jutta Engel; Christiane Bruns; Wolfgang Heitland; Nikolaus Hermes; Karl-Walter Jauch; Reinhard Kopp; Eberhard Pütterich; Reinhard Ruppert; Tibor Schuster; Helmut Friess; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Impact of number of nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J E Tepper; M J O'Connell; D Niedzwiecki; D Hollis; C Compton; A B Benson; B Cummings; L Gunderson; J S Macdonald; R J Mayer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience.

Authors:  Uday B Patel; Fiona Taylor; Lennart Blomqvist; Christopher George; Hywel Evans; Paris Tekkis; Philip Quirke; David Sebag-Montefiore; Brendan Moran; Richard Heald; Ashley Guthrie; Nicola Bees; Ian Swift; Kjell Pennert; Gina Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Methylene blue injection into the rectal artery as a simple method to improve lymph node harvest in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Bruno Märkl; Therese G Kerwel; Theodor Wagner; Matthias Anthuber; Hans M Arnholdt
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  [Oncologic surgery/pathologic-anatomic viewpoint].

Authors:  P Hermanek
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd       Date:  1991

9.  Lymph node retrieval in colorectal cancer resection specimens: national standards are achievable, and low numbers are associated with reduced survival.

Authors:  M G A Norwood; A J Sutton; K West; D P Sharpe; D Hemingway; M J Kelly
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Differential lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer: associated factors and effect on survival.

Authors:  Cedrek McFadden; Brian McKinley; Brian Greenwell; Kaylee Knuckolls; Patrick Culumovic; David Schammel; Christine Schammel; Steven D Trocha
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Jörn Gröne; Florian N Loch; Matthias Taupitz; C Schmidt; Martin E Kreis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Accuracy of Various Lymph Node Staging Criteria in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zixuan Zhuang; Yang Zhang; Mingtian Wei; Xuyang Yang; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.