Literature DB >> 26223403

Life span variation in 13 Drosophila species: a comparative study on life span, environmental variables and stress resistance.

J Wit1, V Loeschcke1, V Kellermann1,2.   

Abstract

Recently, heterogeneity of the environment has been suggested as an important player in the evolution of life span variation. Established ageing theories propose that life span variation is the result of coevolution with other traits, such as stress resistance. This study aimed to compare these alternative hypotheses by examining the relationship between four environmental variables and different types of stress resistance traits with life span in 13 Drosophila species originating from tropical, subtropical and temperate environments (ecotypes). Average life span was found to differ significantly both between species and sexes, but only male life span correlated with the environment and cold resistance. While controlling for phylogeny, the environmental variable precipitation seasonality and resistance against cold-induced stress explained most variation in male life span. Furthermore, male life span varied between species in a manner represented by environmental variables linked to the different ecotypes, such that tropical species lived longer and were less cold resistant. The current results suggest that general mechanisms underlying stress resistance and life span are unlikely. In addition, our results point to the environment independently shaping variation in life span and cold resistance rather than genetic interactions.
© 2015 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2015 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ageing; phylogenetic constraints; sexual dimorphism; thermal adaptation; tropical species

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26223403     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  7 in total

1.  Laboratory breeding of the short-lived annual killifish Nothobranchius furzeri.

Authors:  Matej Polačik; Radim Blažek; Martin Reichard
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Characterization of dFOXO binding sites upstream of the Insulin Receptor P2 promoter across the Drosophila phylogeny.

Authors:  Dorcas J Orengo; Montserrat Aguadé; Elvira Juan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Manipulation of feeding regime alters sexual dimorphism for lifespan and reduces sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Elizabeth M L Duxbury; Wayne G Rostant; Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Evolution, Chance, and Aging.

Authors:  Stewart Frankel; Blanka Rogina
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.599

5.  Genetic and social contributions to sex differences in lifespan in Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Vikram P Narayan; Alastair J Wilson; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 2.516

Review 6.  Life-History Evolution and the Genetics of Fitness Components in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Thomas Flatt
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Environmental suitability models predict population density, performance and body condition for microendemic salamanders.

Authors:  Enrico Lunghi; Raoul Manenti; Manuela Mulargia; Michael Veith; Claudia Corti; Gentile Francesco Ficetola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.