OBJECT: Knowledge of the costs incurred through the delivery of neurosurgical care has been lagging, making it challenging to design impactful cost-containment initiatives. In this report, the authors describe a detailed cost analysis for pituitary surgery episodes of care and demonstrate the importance of such analyses in helping to identify high-impact cost activities and drive value-based care. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of consecutively treated patients undergoing an endoscopic endonasal procedure for the resection of a pituitary adenoma after implementation and maturation of quality-improvement initiatives and the implementation of cost-containment initiatives. RESULTS: The cost data pertaining to 27 patients were reviewed. The 2 most expensive cost activities during the index hospitalization were the total operating room (OR) and total bed-assignment costs. Together, these activities represented more than 60% of the cost of hospitalization. Although value-improvement initiatives contributed to the reduction of variation in the total cost of hospitalization, specific cost activities remained relatively variable, namely the following: 1) OR charged supplies, 2) postoperative imaging, and 3) use of intraoperative neuromonitoring. These activities, however, each contributed to less than 10% of the cost of hospitalization. Bed assignment was the fourth most variable cost activity. Cost related to readmission/reoperation represented less than 5% of the total cost of the surgical episode of care. CONCLUSIONS: After completing a detailed assessment of costs incurred throughout the management of patients undergoing pituitary surgery, high-yield opportunities for cost containment should be identified among the most expensive activities and/or those with the highest variation. Strategies for safely reducing the use of the targeted resources, and related costs incurred, should be developed by the multidisciplinary team providing care for this patient population.
OBJECT: Knowledge of the costs incurred through the delivery of neurosurgical care has been lagging, making it challenging to design impactful cost-containment initiatives. In this report, the authors describe a detailed cost analysis for pituitary surgery episodes of care and demonstrate the importance of such analyses in helping to identify high-impact cost activities and drive value-based care. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of consecutively treated patients undergoing an endoscopic endonasal procedure for the resection of a pituitary adenoma after implementation and maturation of quality-improvement initiatives and the implementation of cost-containment initiatives. RESULTS: The cost data pertaining to 27 patients were reviewed. The 2 most expensive cost activities during the index hospitalization were the total operating room (OR) and total bed-assignment costs. Together, these activities represented more than 60% of the cost of hospitalization. Although value-improvement initiatives contributed to the reduction of variation in the total cost of hospitalization, specific cost activities remained relatively variable, namely the following: 1) OR charged supplies, 2) postoperative imaging, and 3) use of intraoperative neuromonitoring. These activities, however, each contributed to less than 10% of the cost of hospitalization. Bed assignment was the fourth most variable cost activity. Cost related to readmission/reoperation represented less than 5% of the total cost of the surgical episode of care. CONCLUSIONS: After completing a detailed assessment of costs incurred throughout the management of patients undergoing pituitary surgery, high-yield opportunities for cost containment should be identified among the most expensive activities and/or those with the highest variation. Strategies for safely reducing the use of the targeted resources, and related costs incurred, should be developed by the multidisciplinary team providing care for this patient population.
Entities:
Keywords:
ACA = Affordable Care Act; ICU = intensive care unit; IOM = intraoperative monitoring; LOS = length of stay; OR = operating room; POD = postoperative day; cost; intraoperative monitoring; pituitary adenoma; quality; resources; value
Authors: Jessica W Grayson; Agnish Nayak; Mark Winder; Benjamin Jonker; Raquel Alvarado; Henry Barham; Ann McCormack; Richard J Harvey Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2019-10-21
Authors: Alies J Dekkers; Friso de Vries; Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi; Emmy M van der Hoeven; Marco J T Verstegen; Alberto M Pereira; Wouter R van Furth; Nienke R Biermasz Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 6.055
Authors: Regin Jay Mallari; Michael B Avery; Alex Corlin; Amalia Eisenberg; Terese C Hammond; Neil A Martin; Garni Barkhoudarian; Daniel F Kelly Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 3.240