Literature DB >> 26223002

Contact technique and concussions in the South African under-18 Coca-Cola Craven Week Rugby tournament.

Sharief Hendricks1, Sam O'connor1, Michael Lambert1, James Brown1, Nicholas Burger1, Sarah Mc Fie1, Clint Readhead1,2, Wayne Viljoen1,2.   

Abstract

In rugby union, understanding the techniques and events leading to concussions is important because of the nature of the injury and the severity and potential long-term consequences, particularly in junior players. Proper contact technique is a prerequisite for successful participation in rugby and is a major factor associated with injury. However, the execution of proper contact technique and its relationship to injury has yet to be studied in matches. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare contact techniques leading to concussion with a representative sample of similarly matched non-injury (NI) contact events. Injury surveillance was conducted at the 2011-2013 under-18 Craven Week Rugby tournaments. Video footage of 10 concussive events (5 tackle, 4 ruck and 1 aerial collision) and 83 NI events were identified (19 tackle, 61 ruck and 3 aerial collisions). Thereafter, each phase of play was analysed using standardised technical proficiency criteria. Overall score for ruck proficiency in concussive events was 5.67 (out of a total of 15) vs. 6.98 for NI events (n = 54) (effect size = 0.52, small). Overall average score for tackler proficiency was 7.25 (n = 4) and 6.67 (n = 15) for injury and NI tackles, respectively (out of 16) (effect size = 0.19, trivial). This is the first study to compare concussion injury contact technique to a player-matched sample of NI contact techniques. Certain individual technical criteria had an effect towards an NI outcome, and others had an effect towards a concussive event, highlighting that failure to execute certain techniques may substantially increase the opportunity for concussion.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Skill; concussion; injury and prevention; measurement; team sport

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26223002     DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2015.1046192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci        ISSN: 1536-7290            Impact factor:   4.050


  6 in total

1.  Data-Driven Risk Classification of Concussion Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kathryn L Van Pelt; Tim Puetz; Jennylee Swallow; Andrew P Lapointe; Steven P Broglio
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  The what and how of video analysis research in rugby union: a critical review.

Authors:  Steve den Hollander; Ben Jones; Michael Lambert; Sharief Hendricks
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2018-06-18

3.  How does the situation before a tackle influence a tackler's head placement in rugby union?: application of the decision tree analysis.

Authors:  Keita Suzuki; Satoshi Nagai; Koichi Iwai; Takuo Furukawa; Masahiro Takemura
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-03-17

4.  Tackle technique knowledge alone does not translate to proper tackle technique execution in training.

Authors:  Steve den Hollander; Mike Lambert; Ben Jones; Sharief Hendricks
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2021-03-17

5.  Concussion-Reporting Behavior in Rugby: A National Survey of Rugby Union Players in the United States.

Authors:  J Chance Miller; Kenneth Shubin Stein; Tyler J Moon; David P Trofa; Hamish Kerr; Thomas Bottiglieri; C S Ahmad
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-20

Review 6.  Lay of the land: narrative synthesis of tackle research in rugby union and rugby sevens.

Authors:  Nicholas Burger; Mike Lambert; Sharief Hendricks
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-04-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.