Literature DB >> 26222987

A systematic review and economic evaluation of exercise referral schemes in primary care: a short report.

Fiona Campbell1, Mike Holmes1, Emma Everson-Hock1, Sarah Davis1, Helen Buckley Woods1, Nana Anokye2, Paul Tappenden1, Eva Kaltenthaler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is estimated that only 39% of men and 29% of women in England achieve the levels of physical activity that are recommended to protect health and prevent disease. One approach to addressing this problem has been the development of exercise referral schemes (ERSs), in which health professionals refer patients to external exercise providers. These schemes have been widely rolled out across the UK despite concerns that they may not produce sustained changes in levels of physical activity and, therefore, may not be cost-effective interventions. The evidence to determine clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness was evaluated in 2009. This review seeks to update this earlier work by incorporating new evidence and re-examining the cost-effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ERSs compared with usual care.
DESIGN: Exhaustive searches of relevant electronic databases and journals were undertaken to identify new studies evaluating ERSs using a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design. RCTs that incorporated a qualitative evaluation of the intervention were identified in order to explore the barriers and facilitators to the uptake of and adherence to ERSs. Data were extracted using a previously designed tool and study quality assessed for potential bias. Where data could be pooled, meta-analyses were carried out. Qualitative analysis was also undertaken using a thematic approach. The cost-effectiveness was evaluated using a Markov structure which estimated the likelihood of becoming physically active and the subsequent risk reduction on coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The model adopts a lifetime horizon, and a NHS and Personal Social Services perspective was taken with discounting at 1.5% for both costs and benefits.
RESULTS: The search identified one new RCT and one new qualitative study. The new data were pooled with existing data from the 2011 review by Pavey et al. [Pavey TG, Anokye N, Taylor AH, Trueman P, Moxham T, Fox KR, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of exercise referral schemes: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2011;15(44)] to give a total of eight studies with 5190 participants. The proportion of individuals achieving 90-150 minutes of at least moderate-intensity activity per week at 6-12 months' follow-up was greater for ERSs than usual care (relative risk 1.12; 95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.20). Older patients and those referred for CHD risk factors appeared to be more likely than others to increase their levels of physical activity. Qualitative evidence suggests that interventions enabling the development of social support networks are beneficial in promoting uptake and adherence. Exercise referral gained 0.003 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at an additional cost of £225 per person. The estimated mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis was £76,276. In the univariate sensitivity analysis the results were very sensitive (ICERs ranged from < £30,000 to > £100,000) to changes in the effect of ERSs on physical activity uptake and the duration of the protective effects and the direct health-related quality-of-life gains attributable to physical activity.
CONCLUSIONS: Exercise referral schemes result in a small improvement in the number of people who increase their levels of physical activity. The cost-effectiveness analysis indicates that the ICER for ERSs compared with usual care is around £76,000 per QALY, although the cost-effectiveness of ERSs is subject to considerable uncertainty. STUDY REGISTRATION: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42013005200. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26222987      PMCID: PMC4781341          DOI: 10.3310/hta19600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN: 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


  38 in total

1.  Gender Differences in Uptake, Adherence and Experiences: A Longitudinal, Mixed-Methods Study of a Physical Activity Referral Scheme in Scotland, UK.

Authors:  Coral L Hanson; Lis Neubeck; Richard G Kyle; Norrie Brown; Robyn Gallagher; Robyn A Clark; Sheona McHale; Susan Dawkes
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  How can GPs get people moving more?

Authors:  Raymond Leung; Katherine Marino; David Whittaker; Dionisio Izquierdo; Dipesh P Gopal
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 6.302

Review 3.  Physical activity on prescription schemes (PARS): do programme characteristics influence effectiveness? Results of a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Jelena Arsenijevic; Wim Groot
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of the use of Physical ACtivity monitors in an Exercise Referral Setting: the PACERS study.

Authors:  Jemma Hawkins; Michelle Edwards; Joanna Charles; Russell Jago; Mark Kelson; Kelly Morgan; Simon Murphy; Emily Oliver; Sharon Simpson; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Graham Moore
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2017-12-12

5.  Searching for Real-World Effectiveness of Health Care Innovations: Scoping Study of Social Prescribing for Diabetes.

Authors:  Karen Pilkington; Martin Loef; Marie Polley
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  A new model of exercise referral scheme in primary care: is the effect on adherence to physical activity sustainable in the long term? A 15-month randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Carme Martín-Borràs; Maria Giné-Garriga; Anna Puig-Ribera; Carlos Martín; Mercè Solà; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Impact of primary care exercise referral schemes on the health of patients with obesity.

Authors:  Helen M Parretti; Suzanne E Bartington; Tim Badcock; Lucy Hughes; Joan L Duda; Kate Jolly
Journal:  Pragmat Obs Res       Date:  2017-09-21

8.  A community-based, sport-led programme to increase physical activity in an area of deprivation: a qualitative case study.

Authors:  Aphra Garner-Purkis; Samah Alageel; Caroline Burgess; Martin Gulliford
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Adherence to exercise referral schemes by participants - what do providers and commissioners need to know? A systematic review of barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Fiona Morgan; Alysia Battersby; Alison L Weightman; Lydia Searchfield; Ruth Turley; Helen Morgan; James Jagroo; Simon Ellis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  The cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions: A systematic review of reviews.

Authors:  Karim Abu-Omar; Alfred Rütten; Ionuţ Burlacu; Valentin Schätzlein; Sven Messing; Marc Suhrcke
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2017-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.