Literature DB >> 26222603

Quantification of the perceived training load and its relationship with changes in physical fitness performance in junior soccer players.

Erreka Gil-Rey1, Alejandro Lezaun2, Asier Los Arcos3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between perceived respiratory and muscular training load (TL) and changes in physical fitness in elite and non-elite junior soccer players. Twenty-eight elite (n = 14, 17.6 ± 0.6 years, 70.3 ± 4.4 kg, 179.7 ± 5.6 cm) and non-elite (n = 14, 17.5 ± 0.5 years, 71.1 ± 6.5 kg, 178.1 ± 5.6 cm) soccer players belonging to a Spanish first and third division football academies and competing in junior Spanish first division (2012-2013) participated in the study. Countermovement jump (CMJ), CMJ arm swing, 5 and 15 m sprints and the Université de Montreal endurance test were performed in January and 9 weeks later in March. In order to quantify TLs, after each training session and match, players reported their session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) separately for respiratory (sRPEres) and leg musculature (sRPEmus). Elite players accumulated greater weekly training volume (361 ± 14 vs. 280 ± 48 min; effect sizes (ES) = 5.23 ± 1.74; most likely), and perceived respiratory (1460 ± 184 vs. 1223 ± 260 AU; ES = 1.12 ± 0.79; very likely) and muscular (1548 ± 216 vs. 1318 ± 308 AU; ES = 0.99 ± 0.84; likely) TL than did non-elite players. Training volume, sRPEres-TL and sRPEmus-TL were positively and largely correlated (r = 0.67-0.71) with the changes in aerobic fitness. The present results suggest that a low training volume and TL can impair improvement in aerobic fitness in junior soccer players during the in-season period.

Keywords:  football; performance; session-RPE; training

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26222603     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1069385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  4 in total

1.  The Association Between Training Load and Performance in Team Sports: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jordan L Fox; Robert Stanton; Charli Sargent; Sally-Anne Wintour; Aaron T Scanlan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Variations of training load, monotony, and strain and dose-response relationships with maximal aerobic speed, maximal oxygen uptake, and isokinetic strength in professional soccer players.

Authors:  Filipe Manuel Clemente; Cain Clark; Daniel Castillo; Hugo Sarmento; Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis; Thomas Rosemann; Beat Knechtle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  In-season training periodization of professional soccer players.

Authors:  A Los Arcos; A Mendez-Villanueva; R Martínez-Santos
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.806

4.  Dose-Response Relationship Between External Load Variables, Body Composition, and Fitness Variables in Professional Soccer Players.

Authors:  Filipe Manuel Clemente; Pantelis Theodoros Nikolaidis; Thomas Rosemann; Beat Knechtle
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.566

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.