| Literature DB >> 26221096 |
Yankee C Magalhães1, Maria Rosa Q Bomfim2, Luciane C Melônio1, Patrícia C S Ribeiro3, Lécia M Cosme4, Cristianne R Rhoden1, Sirlei G Marques3.
Abstract
In this study, we isolated and phenotypically identified 108 yeast strains from various clinical specimens collected from 100 hospitalized patients at three tertiary hospitals in São Luís-Maranhão, Brazil, from July to December 2010. The isolates were analyzed for their susceptibility to four of the most widely used antifungal agents in the surveyed hospitals, amphotericin B, fluconazole, 5-flucytosine and voriconazole. The species identified were Candida albicans (41.4%), Candida tropicalis (30.1%), C. glabrata (7.4%), Candida parapsilosis (5.5%), Candida krusei (4.6%), Cryptococcus neoformans (4.6%), Trichosporon spp . (3.7%), Candida norvegensis (0.9%), Rhodotorula glutinis (0.9%) and Pichia farinosa (0.9%). A higher isolation rate was observed in the following clinical specimens: urine (54 isolates; 50%), respiratory tract samples (21 isolates; 19.4%) and blood (20 isolates; 18.6%). Candida albicans isolates were 100% sensitive to all antifungal agents tested, whereas Candida krusei and Crytococcus neoformans displayed intermediate resistance to 5-flucytosine, with Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) values of 8 mg/mL and 16 mg/mL, respectively. Both strains were also S-DD to fluconazole with an MIC of 16 mg/mL. C. tropicalis was resistant to 5-flucytosine with an MIC of 32 μg/mL. This study demonstrates the importance of identifying the yeast species involved in community and nosocomial infections.Entities:
Keywords: fungal infections; nosocomial infections; susceptibility profile
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26221096 PMCID: PMC4512074 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838246120120296
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Frequency of yeast species isolated from clinical specimens taken from patients hospitalized in public and private hospitals in São Luís - MA from July to December 2010.
| Species isolated | Hospital A | Hospital B | Hospital C | Total isolates |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Isolates nº. (%) | ||||
|
| 17 (15.8) | 16 (14.8) | 12 (11.1) | 45 (41.7) |
|
| 2 (1.85) | 4 (3.7) | 2 (1.85) | 8 (7.4) |
|
| 2 (1.85) | 2 (1.85) | 1 (0.9) | 5 (4.6) |
|
| 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.9) |
|
| 2 (1.85) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (3.7) | 6 (5.6) |
|
| 12 (11.1) | 10 (9.3) | 10 (9.3) | 32 (29.7) |
|
| 3 (2.8) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) | 5 (4.6) |
|
| 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) |
|
| 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.9) |
|
| 2 (1.85) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.85) | 4 (3.7) |
| Total | 41 (37.9) | 34 (31.5) | 33 (30.6) | 108 (100%) |
Distribution of 108 yeast isolates identified in cultures of different biological materials evaluated during July to December 2010.
| Clinical specimens | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Yeasts isolated | Urine (Nº. (%)) | Blood (Nº. (%)) |
R.T. (Nº. (%))
| Catheter tip (Nº. (%)) | Líquor (Nº. (%)) |
Others (Nº. (%))
| Nº total isolates (Nº. (%)) |
|
| 24 (22.2) | 4 (3.7) | 13 (12.1) | 2 (1.85) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.85) | 45 (41.7) |
|
| 4 (3.7) | 2 (1.85) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 08 (7.4) |
|
| 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 01 (0.9) |
|
| 2 (1.85) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 05 (4.6) |
|
| 1 (0.9) | 4 (3.7) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 06 (5.6) |
|
| 20 (18.6) | 5 (4.6) | 4 (3.7) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.85) | 32 (29.7) |
|
| 0 (0.0) | 3 (2.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.85) | 0 (0.0) | 05 (4.6) |
|
| 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 01 (0.9) |
|
| 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 01 (0.9) |
|
| 2 (1.85) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 04 (3.7) |
| Total | 54 (50.0) | 20 (18.6) | 21 (19.4) | 7 (6.4) | 2 (1.85) | 4 (3.7) | 108 (100) |
Respiratory Tract.
Others (Wound secretions, wound fragments, vaginal secretions, and stools of patients).
In vitro antifungal susceptibility and the MIC50 and MIC90 of yeasts isolated from patients admitted to three hospitals in São Luís, MA, from July to December 2010.
| Antifungal agents/yeasts isolated | Isolates (nº) | MIC (μg/mL) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Range | MIC 50 | MIC 90 | ||
| Anfotericina B | ||||
|
| 45 | 0.5 – 2 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 8 | 0.5 – 2 | ND | ND |
|
| 5 | 0.5 – 1 | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | 0.5 | ND | ND |
|
| 6 | 0.5 | ND | ND |
|
| 32 | 0.25 – 0.5 | 0 5 | 0 5 |
|
| 5 | 0.5 – 1 | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 4 | ND | ND | ND |
| Fluconazol | ||||
|
| 45 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 8 | 2 – 4 | ND | ND |
|
| 5 | 8 – 16 | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | 4 | ND | ND |
|
| 6 | 2 | ND | ND |
|
| 32 | 1 – 4 | 1 | 2 |
|
| 5 | 1 – 16 | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 4 | ND | ND | ND |
| 5-Flucytosine | ||||
|
| 45 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 8 | 1 | ND | ND |
|
| 5 | 4 – 8 | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | 2 | ND | ND |
|
| 6 | 1 | ND | ND |
|
| 32 | 1 – 32 | 1 | 1 |
|
| 5 | 1 – 16 | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 4 | ND | ND | ND |
| Voriconazol | ||||
|
| 45 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
|
| 8 | 0.12 – 1 | ND | ND |
|
| 5 | 0.12 | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | 0.12 | ND | ND |
|
| 6 | 0.12 | ND | ND |
|
| 32 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
|
| 5 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 1 | ND | ND | ND |
|
| 4 | ND | ND | ND |
Legend: MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC90 = minimum inhibitory concentration for 90% of the isolates and MIC50 = minimum inhibitory concentration for 50% of the isolates, ND = Not determined.