| Literature DB >> 26220872 |
Christian Ovesen1, Anders Fogh Christensen2, Inger Havsteen2, Christine Krarup Hansen1, Sverre Rosenbaum1, Engin Kurt2, Hanne Christensen1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Patients with intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) are at high risk of neurological deterioration (ND). We aimed at establishing predictors of early ND (END) as well as late ND (LND) and at exploring the impact of neurological stability during the first week on long-term prognosis.Entities:
Keywords: STROKE MEDICINE
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26220872 PMCID: PMC4521514 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008563
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Study outline and prevalence of neurological deterioration during the first week. Panel (A) describes the incidence of END during the first 24 h, and panel (B) describes the incidence of LND during the following 6 days (CTA, CT angiography; END, early neurological deterioration; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; ICH, intracerebral haemorrhage; LND, late neurological deterioration; NC-CT, non-contrast CT).
Independent predictors of END and LND
| OR | 95% CI | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| END—patients with CTA on admission (n=224) | |||
| Anticoagulation treatment | 3.41 | 1.19 to 9.80 | 0.023 |
| Admission Graeb Score | |||
| 0 points | 1.00 | – | – |
| 1–5 points | 2.02 | 0.76 to 5.40 | 0.161 |
| 6–12 points | 8.73 | 2.87 to 26.5 | <0.001 |
| Admission haematoma volume | |||
| >60 mL | 1.00 | – | – |
| 10–59.9 mL | 0.43 | 0.18 to 1.06 | 0.066 |
| <10 mL | 0.27 | 0.09 to 0.82 | 0.021 |
| Spot sign | 10.7 | 4.79 to 24.3 | <0.001 |
| END—all patients (n=299) | |||
| Anticoagulation treatment | 3.87 | 1.65 to 9.11 | 0.002 |
| Admission Graeb Score | |||
| 0 points | 1.00 | – | – |
| 1–5 points | 1.59 | 0.73 to 3.46 | 0.241 |
| 6–12 points | 4.63 | 1.79 to 12.0 | 0.002 |
| Admission SAH | 2.24 | 1.03 to 4.87 | 0.042 |
| Admission haematoma volume | |||
| >60 mL | 1.00 | – | – |
| 10–59.9 mL | 0.44 | 0.20 to 0.95 | 0.037 |
| <10 mL | 0.20 | 0.07 to 0.56 | 0.002 |
| Admission NIHSS (per point) | 1.08 | 1.03 to 1.14 | 0.002 |
| LND—all patients at risk at day 1 (n=204) | |||
| Charlson Score (per point) | 1.74 | 1.18 to 2.55 | 0.005 |
| Haematoma location | |||
| Lobar | 1.00 | – | – |
| Basal ganglia | 0.17 | 0.05 to 0.59 | 0.005 |
| Posterior fossa | 0.22 | 0.02 to 3.14 | 0.263 |
| Admission Graeb Score | |||
| 0 points | 1 | – | – |
| 1–5 points | 4.81 | 1.42 to 16.3 | 0.012 |
| 6–12 points | 22.2 | 3.66 to 134.8 | 0.001 |
| Admission NIHSS (per point) | 1.13 | 1.03 to 1.23 | 0.014 |
Variables offered to both END models were anticoagulation treatment, admission Graeb Score, SAH on admission, serum glucose level, admission midline shift, admission haematoma volume, and admission NIHSS value (the spot sign presents only the first model). Variables offered to the LND model were Charlson Score, admission NIHSS, admission haematoma volume, admission Graeb Score, and admission midline shift.
CTA, CT angiography; END, early neurological deterioration; LND, late neurological deterioration; NIHSS, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Follow-up imaging characteristics
| Early neurological deterioration | Late neurological deterioration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude OR | Adjusted OR* | Crude OR | Adjusted OR† | |
| Significant haematoma expansion, >12.5 mL | 15.0 (6.3 to 35.5) | 6.1 (2.2 to 17.3) | 2.0 (0.4 to 10.5) | NI |
| Follow-up Graeb Score, per point | 1.3 (1.2 to 1.5) | NI | 1.5 (1.2 to 1.9) | NI |
| Delayed IVH | 10.3 (3.2 to 33.3) | NI | 2.6 (0.2 to 26.6) | NI |
| IVH expansion, per Graeb point | 11.0 (4.4 to 27.2) | 1.7 (1.2 to 2.3) | 5.5 (1.1 to 26.3) | 2.3 (1.3 to 4.2) |
| SAH on the follow-up scan | 3.4 (1.6 to 7.3) | 2.8 (0.8 to 9.3) | 2.6 (0.7 to 9.5) | NI |
| Delayed SAH | 3.4 (0.6 to 21.3) | NI | NA | NA |
| Hydrocephalus | 5.3 (1.7 to 16.3) | 1.4 (0.3 to 6.6) | 2.6 (0.2 to 26.6) | NI |
| Midline shift, per mm | 1.3 (1.1 to 1.4) | 1.1 (0.9 to 1.3) | 1.2 (0.9 to 1.4) | NI |
*We adjusted for admission haematoma volume and admission Graeb Score.
†We adjusted for admission Graeb Score.
IVH, interventricular haemorrhage; NA, not assessed due to incomplete representation; NI, not included in the model due to insignificance or representation by other values (collinearity); SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Figure 2Survival curves displaying mortality during the first year. Panel (A) shows the cumulative mortality (±95% CI) of stable patients and patients with neurological deterioration (ND) during the first week. Panel (B) shows the cumulative mortality separated into patients with early ND (END), late ND (LND), and stable neurological status during the first week.