Literature DB >> 26220503

The Value of Rotational Venography Versus Anterior-Posterior Venography in 100 Consecutive IVC Filter Retrievals.

Ryan M Kiefer1, Nirnimesh Pandey2, Scott O Trerotola2, Gregory J Nadolski2, S William Stavropoulos3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurately detecting inferior vena cava (IVC) filter complications is important for safe and successful retrieval as tip-embedded filters require removal with non-standard techniques. Venography prior to IVC filter retrieval has traditionally used a single anterior-posterior (AP) projection. This study compares the utility of rotational venography to AP venography prior to IVC filter removal.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The rotational venograms from 100 consecutive IVC filter retrievals over a 35-month period were evaluated retrospectively. The AP view of the rotational venogram was examined separately from the full series by a radiologist blinded to alternative imaging and operative findings. The venograms were evaluated for tip embedding, filter fracture, filter thrombus, and IVC thrombus. Statistical analysis was performed.
RESULTS: Using operative findings and peri-procedural imaging as the reference standard, tip embedding occurred in 59 of the 100 filters (59%). AP venography was used to correctly identify 31 tip-embedded filters (53% sensitivity) with two false positives (95% specificity) for an accuracy of 70%. Rotational venography was used to correctly identify 58 tip-embedded filters (98% sensitivity) with one false positive (98% specificity) for an accuracy of 98%. A significant difference was found in the sensitivities of the two diagnostic approaches (P < .01). Other findings of thrombus and filter fracture were not significantly different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Rotational venograms allow for more accurate detection of tip-embedded IVC filters compared to AP views alone. As this determines the approach taken, rotational venograms are helpful if obtained prior to IVC filter retrieval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26220503     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-015-1183-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  1 in total

Review 1.  Vena Cava Filters: Toward Optimal Strategies for Filter Retrieval and Patients' Follow-Up.

Authors:  Kiara Rezaei-Kalantari; David C Rotzinger; Salah D Qanadli
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.