BACKGROUND: The provision of assistive devices (PAD) is a key element of care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Since 2011, assistive devices (AD) have been coordinated in an internet-supported care network at university-based ALS centers in Berlin, Bochum, Hannover and Jena. The digitization of PAD processes has facilitated the evaluation of real-life ALS care. OBJECTIVES: Orthotics (OT), augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), supported treadmill (ST) and powered wheelchair (PW) were the PAD groups analyzed for delivery rates (proportion of delivered AD vs. medically indicated AD), rejection by patients and payers and latency of provision of care. RESULTS: Between June 2011 and October 2014 a total of 1479 patients and 12,478 AD were coordinated, among which 3313 PAD were related to OT, AAC, ST or EM. The median delivery rate was 64.3 %. The mean rejection rate by patients was 9.8 % (OT 5.4 %, AAC 9.8 %, ST 10.2 % and PW 15.6 %). Marked differences were noted in the rejection rate by payers and in care provision latency: OT (16.2 %, 68 days, n = 734), AAC (30.4 %, 96 days, n = 392), ST (34.8 %, 113 days, n = 164) and PW (35.6 %, 129 days, n = 259). Analysis of rejection rates showed significant differences among insurers. CONCLUSION: Only two thirds of the medically indicated AD reached the patients. Rejection rates by patients and payers and latency of provision of care were high. The PAD can substantially vary among health insurance companies. The establishment of consented criteria for PAD and their integration into treatment regimens and guidelines are crucial tasks for the future.
BACKGROUND: The provision of assistive devices (PAD) is a key element of care in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Since 2011, assistive devices (AD) have been coordinated in an internet-supported care network at university-based ALS centers in Berlin, Bochum, Hannover and Jena. The digitization of PAD processes has facilitated the evaluation of real-life ALS care. OBJECTIVES: Orthotics (OT), augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), supported treadmill (ST) and powered wheelchair (PW) were the PAD groups analyzed for delivery rates (proportion of delivered AD vs. medically indicated AD), rejection by patients and payers and latency of provision of care. RESULTS: Between June 2011 and October 2014 a total of 1479 patients and 12,478 AD were coordinated, among which 3313 PAD were related to OT, AAC, ST or EM. The median delivery rate was 64.3 %. The mean rejection rate by patients was 9.8 % (OT 5.4 %, AAC 9.8 %, ST 10.2 % and PW 15.6 %). Marked differences were noted in the rejection rate by payers and in care provision latency: OT (16.2 %, 68 days, n = 734), AAC (30.4 %, 96 days, n = 392), ST (34.8 %, 113 days, n = 164) and PW (35.6 %, 129 days, n = 259). Analysis of rejection rates showed significant differences among insurers. CONCLUSION: Only two thirds of the medically indicated AD reached the patients. Rejection rates by patients and payers and latency of provision of care were high. The PAD can substantially vary among health insurance companies. The establishment of consented criteria for PAD and their integration into treatment regimens and guidelines are crucial tasks for the future.
Authors: Mohammed Sanjak; Elena Bravver; William L Bockenek; H James Norton; Benjamin R Brooks Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Mary R O'Brien; Bridget Whitehead; Philip N Murphy; J Douglas Mitchell; Barbara A Jack Journal: Palliat Med Date: 2011-03-07 Impact factor: 4.762
Authors: Huub Creemers; Anita Beelen; Hepke Grupstra; Frans Nollet; Leonard H van den Berg Journal: Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 4.092
Authors: Marc Kastrup; Benjamin Tittmann; Tanja Sawatzki; Martin Gersch; Charlotte Vogt; Max Rosenthal; Simone Rosseau; Claudia Spies Journal: Ger Med Sci Date: 2017-12-19