Literature DB >> 26219075

The Moderately Efficient Enzyme: Futile Encounters and Enzyme Floppiness.

Arren Bar-Even1, Ron Milo, Elad Noor2, Dan S Tawfik.   

Abstract

The pioneering model of Henri, Michaelis, and Menten was based on the fast equilibrium assumption: the substrate binds its enzyme reversibly, and substrate dissociation is much faster than product formation. Here, we examine this assumption from a somewhat different point of view, asking what fraction of enzyme-substrate complexes are futile, i.e., result in dissociation rather than product formation. In Knowles' notion of a "perfect" enzyme, all encounters of the enzyme with its substrate result in conversion to product. Thus, the perfect enzyme's catalytic efficiency, kcat/KM, is constrained by only the diffusion on-rate, and the fraction of futile encounters (defined as φ) approaches zero. The available data on >1000 different enzymes suggest that for ≥90% of enzymes φ > 0.99 and for the "average enzyme" φ ≥ 0.9999; namely, <1 of 10(4) encounters is productive. Thus, the "fast equilibrium" assumption holds for the vast majority of enzymes. We discuss possible molecular origins for the dominance of futile encounters, including the coexistence of multiple sub-states of an enzyme's active site (enzyme floppiness) and/or its substrate. Floppiness relates to the inherent flexibility of proteins, but also to conflicting demands, or trade-offs, between rate acceleration (the rate-determining chemical step) and catalytic turnover, or between turnover rate and accuracy. The study of futile encounters and active-site floppiness may contribute to a better understanding of enzyme catalysis, enzyme evolution, and improved enzyme design.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26219075     DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  29 in total

1.  Synergistic effects of functionally distinct substitutions in β-lactamase variants shed light on the evolution of bacterial drug resistance.

Authors:  Meha P Patel; Liya Hu; Cameron A Brown; Zhizeng Sun; Carolyn J Adamski; Vlatko Stojanoski; Banumathi Sankaran; B V Venkataram Prasad; Timothy Palzkill
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Conformational dynamics and enzyme evolution.

Authors:  Dušan Petrović; Valeria A Risso; Shina Caroline Lynn Kamerlin; Jose M Sanchez-Ruiz
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Perspective: Defining and quantifying the role of dynamics in enzyme catalysis.

Authors:  Arieh Warshel; Ram Prasad Bora
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  Use of chemical modification and mass spectrometry to identify substrate-contacting sites in proteinaceous RNase P, a tRNA processing enzyme.

Authors:  Tien-Hao Chen; Akiko Tanimoto; Nikoloz Shkriabai; Mamuka Kvaratskhelia; Vicki Wysocki; Venkat Gopalan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Mainly on the Plane: Deep Subsurface Bacterial Proteins Bind and Alter Clathrate Structure.

Authors:  Abigail M Johnson; Dustin J E Huard; Jongchan Kim; Priyam Raut; Sheng Dai; Raquel L Lieberman; Jennifer B Glass
Journal:  Cryst Growth Des       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.076

Review 6.  A mechanistic view of enzyme evolution.

Authors:  Gloria Yang; Charlotte M Miton; Nobuhiko Tokuriki
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Dynamic Conformational States Dictate Selectivity toward the Native Substrate in a Substrate-Permissive Acyltransferase.

Authors:  Olesya Levsh; Ying-Chih Chiang; Chun Fai Tung; Joseph P Noel; Yi Wang; Jing-Ke Weng
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 8.  Why Proteins are Big: Length Scale Effects on Equilibria and Kinetics.

Authors:  Kenneth A Rubinson
Journal:  Protein J       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.371

9.  Evolution of a Protein Interaction Domain Family by Tuning Conformational Flexibility.

Authors:  Dustin S Whitney; Brian F Volkman; Kenneth E Prehoda
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  A conserved threonine prevents self-intoxication of enoyl-thioester reductases.

Authors:  Raoul G Rosenthal; Bastian Vögeli; Tristan Wagner; Seigo Shima; Tobias J Erb
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 15.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.