Victoria M Samuel1, Gillian A Colville, Sarah Goodwin, Kirsty Ryninks, Suzanne Dean. 1. 1South Wales Programme in Clinical Psychology, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. 2St. George's Hospital, London, UK. 3PICU, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK. 4Lift Psychology, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess whether prospectively screening parents for psychological vulnerability would enable beneficial targeting of a subsequent follow-up clinic. DESIGN AND SETTING:Parents of children consecutively admitted to a PICU were assessed for risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder at discharge using the Posttraumatic Adjustment Scale. INTERVENTIONS:High-risk parents were then randomized to the intervention (follow-up clinic, 2 mo after discharge) or control condition. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All parents completed Impact of Event Scale-Revised and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 6 months. Of the 209 parents of 145 children recruited to the study, 78 (37%) were identified, on the basis of their Posttraumatic Adjustment Scale score at baseline, as being at risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder, and randomized to the control or intervention condition. Follow-up data were provided by 157 of 209 parents (75%). Logistic regression analyses controlling for parent gender and child length of stay showed that high-risk control parents (n = 32) were significantly more likely to score above the clinical cutoff for all three psychological outcomes than parents deemed low risk at baseline (n = 89) (posttraumatic stress: odds ratio = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.28-8.92; p = 0.014; anxiety: odds ratio = 6.34; 95% CI, 2.55-15.76; p < 0.001; depression: odds ratio = 4.13; 95% CI, 1.47-11.61; p = 0.007). Only 14 of 38 (37%) high-risk intervention parents attended the follow-up clinic appointment they were offered. At follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups, but there were small effect sizes in favor of the intervention for anxiety scores (Cohen d = 0.209) and depression scores (Cohen d = 0.254) CONCLUSIONS: : Screening parents for psychological vulnerability using measures such as the Posttraumatic Adjustment Scale may enable more efficient targeting of support. However, further research is needed on how best to provide effective follow-up intervention for families.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess whether prospectively screening parents for psychological vulnerability would enable beneficial targeting of a subsequent follow-up clinic. DESIGN AND SETTING: Parents of children consecutively admitted to a PICU were assessed for risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder at discharge using the Posttraumatic Adjustment Scale. INTERVENTIONS: High-risk parents were then randomized to the intervention (follow-up clinic, 2 mo after discharge) or control condition. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All parents completed Impact of Event Scale-Revised and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 6 months. Of the 209 parents of 145 children recruited to the study, 78 (37%) were identified, on the basis of their Posttraumatic Adjustment Scale score at baseline, as being at risk of developing posttraumatic stress disorder, and randomized to the control or intervention condition. Follow-up data were provided by 157 of 209 parents (75%). Logistic regression analyses controlling for parent gender and child length of stay showed that high-risk control parents (n = 32) were significantly more likely to score above the clinical cutoff for all three psychological outcomes than parents deemed low risk at baseline (n = 89) (posttraumatic stress: odds ratio = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.28-8.92; p = 0.014; anxiety: odds ratio = 6.34; 95% CI, 2.55-15.76; p < 0.001; depression: odds ratio = 4.13; 95% CI, 1.47-11.61; p = 0.007). Only 14 of 38 (37%) high-risk intervention parents attended the follow-up clinic appointment they were offered. At follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups, but there were small effect sizes in favor of the intervention for anxiety scores (Cohen d = 0.209) and depression scores (Cohen d = 0.254) CONCLUSIONS: : Screening parents for psychological vulnerability using measures such as the Posttraumatic Adjustment Scale may enable more efficient targeting of support. However, further research is needed on how best to provide effective follow-up intervention for families.
Authors: Cydni N Williams; Mary E Hartman; Kristin P Guilliams; Rejean M Guerriero; Juan A Piantino; Christopher C Bosworth; Skyler S Leonard; Kathryn Bradbury; Amanda Wagner; Trevor A Hall Journal: Curr Treat Options Neurol Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 3.598
Authors: Mark J Peters; Andrew Argent; Marino Festa; Stéphane Leteurtre; Jefferson Piva; Ann Thompson; Douglas Willson; Pierre Tissières; Marisa Tucci; Jacques Lacroix Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Amery Treble-Barna; Sue R Beers; Amy J Houtrow; Roberto Ortiz-Aguayo; Cynthia Valenta; Meg Stanger; Maddie Chrisman; Maxine Orringer; Craig M Smith; Dorothy Pollon; Mark Duffett; Karen Choong; R Scott Watson; Patrick M Kochanek; Ericka L Fink Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Ericka L Fink; Patrick M Kochanek; Robert C Tasker; John Beca; Michael J Bell; Robert S B Clark; Jamie Hutchison; Monica S Vavilala; Anthony Fabio; Derek C Angus; R Scott Watson Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Mary E Hartman; Cydni N Williams; Trevor A Hall; Christopher C Bosworth; Juan A Piantino Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Kathleen L Meert; Beth S Slomine; James R Christensen; Russell Telford; Richard Holubkov; J Michael Dean; Frank W Moler Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.624