Literature DB >> 26218023

Influence of Different Surface Characteristics on Peri-implant Tissue Behavior: A Six-Year Prospective Report.

Maria Menini, Elena Dellepiane, David Chvartszaid, Domenico Baldi, Irene Schiavetti, Paolo Pera.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the behavior of hard and soft tissue around implants with different surface treatments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients were identified for this study. Each patient received at least 2 implants (1 control, 1 test) into an edentulous quadrant, for a total of 10 pairs of implants. Two types of implants were used: hybrid implants (control) with a dual acid-etched surface in their apical portion and a machined coronal part, and test implants with an acid-etched surface throughout their entire length. Standardized periapical radiographs were taken at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year post implant placement and then annually until the 6-year follow-up. Bleeding on probing (BOP) and Plaque Index (PI) were recorded annually. Probing depth (PD) was recorded at the 6-year follow-up.
RESULTS: Moderate crestal bone remodeling was observed during the 1-year postimplant placement evaluation (P=.001), and test implants revealed smaller marginal bone resorption (P=.030). No significant changes in bone level were observed between the 1-year and the 6-year follow-up appointments, and a significantly smaller bone resorption was found at test implants. No statistically significant differences in bone resorption were found between maxilla and mandible. No statistically significant differences were detected between test and control implants for BOP, PI, or PD.
CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results suggest that implant surface characteristics might affect the bone remodeling phase subsequent to the surgical trauma. However, once osseointegration was established, implant surfaces did not affect bone maintenance over time. Implant surfaces did not affect soft tissue behavior. The results of this pilot study need to be confirmed in a study with a larger sample size and over a longer time frame.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26218023     DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Prosthodont        ISSN: 0893-2174            Impact factor:   1.681


  5 in total

1.  Fibroblast Interaction with Different Abutment Surfaces: In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Luigi Canullo; Tullio Genova; Esperanza Gross Trujillo; Guillermo Pradies; Sara Petrillo; Maurizio Muzzi; Stefano Carossa; Federico Mussano
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 5.923

2.  Roughness and SEM Analysis of Manual and Ultrasonic Instrumentation over Different Crown Materials for Dental Implants Restorations.

Authors:  Domenico Baldi; Jacopo Colombo; Paola Gavoglio; Luisa De Giorgis; Franco Motta; Andrea Lugas; Enrico Lertora; Gianmario Schierano
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 3.  Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Titanium and Zirconia Implant Abutments: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Felita Clarissa Halim; Paolo Pesce; Nicola De Angelis; Stefano Benedicenti; Maria Menini
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-28       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Digital vs. Freehand Anterior Single-Tooth Implant Restoration.

Authors:  D Baldi; J Colombo; F Motta; F M Motta; A Zillio; N Scotti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The Effects of Ultrasonic Scaling and Air-Abrasive Powders on the Decontamination of 9 Implant-Abutment Surfaces: Scanning Electron Analysis and In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Francesco Gianfreda; Patrizio Bollero; Maurizio Muzzi; Andrea Di Giulio; Eleonora Nicolai; Luigi Canullo
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.