| Literature DB >> 26217818 |
Nikola Stikov1, Jennifer S W Campbell2, Thomas Stroh2, Mariette Lavelée2, Stephen Frey2, Jennifer Novek2, Stephen Nuara2, Ming-Kai Ho2, Barry J Bedell2, Robert F Dougherty3, Ilana R Leppert2, Mathieu Boudreau2, Sridar Narayanan2, Tanguy Duval4, Julien Cohen-Adad4, Paul-Alexandre Picard5, Alicja Gasecka6, Daniel Côté6, G Bruce Pike7.
Abstract
We provide a detailed morphometric analysis of eight transmission electron micrographs (TEMs) obtained from the corpus callosum of one cynomolgus macaque. The raw TEM images are included in the article, along with the distributions of the axon caliber and the myelin g-ratio in each image. The distributions are analyzed to determine the relationship between axon caliber and g-ratio, and compared against the aggregate metrics (myelin volume fraction, fiber volume fraction, and the aggregate g-ratio), as defined in the accompanying research article entitled 'In vivo histology of the myelin g-ratio with magnetic resonance imaging' (Stikov et al., NeuroImage, 2015).Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26217818 PMCID: PMC4510539 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.05.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1Distribution of axon caliber in images 1–8.
Fig. 2Distribution of g-ratios in images 1–8.
Fig. 3Correlation between axon caliber and myelin g-ratio in images 1–8.
Measurements of the MVF, FVF, and the g-ratio (aggregate and mean) for images 1–8. The aggregate g-ratio correlates significantly with the mean g-ratio (r= 0.85, p= 0.007). For definitions of these metrics, please consult [1].
| Sample | MVF | FVF | Aggregate | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.34 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 0.65 |
| 2 | 0.27 | 0.56 | 0.72 | 0.66 |
| 3 | 0.40 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.62 |
| 4 | 0.22 | 0.50 | 0.75 | 0.68 |
| 5 | 0.27 | 0.56 | 0.72 | 0.65 |
| 6 | 0.26 | 0.56 | 0.74 | 0.66 |
| 7 | 0.23 | 0.41 | 0.67 | 0.60 |
| 8 | 0.19 | 0.43 | 0.75 | 0.65 |
| Subject area | Neuroanatomy |
| More specific subject area | Morphometry |
| Type of data | Electron microscopy (EM) images, and figures illustrating the EM analysis |
| How data was acquired | FEI Tecnai 12 120 kV Transmission Electron Microscope |
| Data format | TIFF (raw) |
| Experimental factors | Specimen perfusion fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and 2% glutaraldehyde, then stained with osmium |
| Experimental features | EM images were analyzed using an automated method for the segmentation and morphometry of white matter |
| Data source location | Montreal, Canada |
| Data accessibility | Data is included with this article |