Literature DB >> 26217677

Quantitative analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome.

Jacek R Wiśniewski1, Dariusz Rakus2.   

Abstract

Escherichia coli (strain ATCC 25922 in a stationary culture) cells were lysed with SDS and the lysates were processed according MED-FASP protocol. The released peptides were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Protein content per bacterial cell was calculated on the basis of the DNA content. Absolute protein quantitation was performed using the 'Total Protein Approach'. The data are supplied in the article.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absolute protein quantification; Escherichia coli proteome; Filter-aided sample preparation, FASP; Protein copy number; Total protein approach

Year:  2014        PMID: 26217677      PMCID: PMC4459560          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2014.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table Value of the data Quantitative picture of the E. coli proteome at protein copy number More than 2200 protein identified single per sample The protein abundances span 5 orders of magnitude

Experimental design

Bacterial lysates were processed according to MED FASP protocol (Fig. 1). Peptides were analyzed by LC–MS/MS and the resulting spectra were handled by the MaxQuant software. All peptides and proteins identified in this study are listed in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2 (for table legend see ‘Legends to Tables 1 and 2’), respectively. Absolute protein contents and protein concentrations were calculated using the total protein approach (Table 2). DNA was digested with nuclease and the released nucleotides were quantified. The total protein content of the single bacterial cell was calculated from the total DNA and total protein of the sample as described in [1]. The total protein content of the single cell was used for computation of protein copy numbers per cell (Table S2). Table S3 shows a selection of proteins involved energy metabolism in Escherichia coli.
Fig. 1

Schematic of the MED FASP protocol.

Material and methods

Bacterial lysate

E. coli strain ATCC 25922 was cultured at 37 °C in Luria-Bertani broth medium with shaking at 250 rpm for approximately 15 h. The bacteria were harvested by centrifugation at 5000g and then lysed within 2% SDS in 0.1 M TrisHCl pH 7.8 containing 0.1 M DTT at 100°C for 5 min. The non-soluble material was removed by centrifugation at 16,000g, and the supernatants were used for analysis.

Filter-aided protein and nucleic acid digestion

The lysates were processed according to the MED-FASP [2] protocol that was extended with nucleic acid digestion steps. Briefly, aliquots containing 50 μg total protein were mixed with 200 μL of 8 M urea in 0.1 M Tris/HCl, pH 8.5 [3] in centrifugal ultrafiltration units with a nominal molecular weight cut off of 30,000 (Cat no. MRCF0R030, Millipore), and then centrifuged at 14,000g, 20 °C, for 15 min. The eluates were discarded, 100 μL of UA was pipetted into the filtration unit, and the units were centrifuged again. Then 50 μL of 0.05 M iodoacetamide in UA was added to the filters, and samples were incubated in darkness for 20 min. Filters were washed twice with 100 μL of UA followed by two washes with 100 μL of 0.05 M Tris/HCl pH 8.5. Proteins were digested in 40 μL 0.05 M Tris/HCl pH 8.5 at 37 °C for 18 h, using endoproteinase LysC, at an enzyme to protein ratio of 1:50. The released peptides were collected by centrifugation at 14,000g for 10 min followed by two washes with 0.05 M Tris/HCl pH 8.5. After isolation of the peptides, material remaining on the filter was digested with trypsin using the above conditions, except that the cleavage reaction was performed for only 2 h. After collection of the peptides released by trypsin, the material remaining on the filter was washed once with TE buffer (10 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.0) and then the RNA was digested with 0.5 μL (0.5U) of RiboShredder (Epicenter, Madison, WI) in 60 μL of TE at 37 °C for 1 h. The digested RNA was collected by centrifugation. Then the filters were washed twice with 80 μL of TE. Subsequently the filtration units were assembled in new tubes and the DNA was cleaved with 6 μg DNase (DN25, Sigma, St. Louis) in 60 μL of 10 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.8 buffer containing 2.5 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 mM CaCl2. After 1 h incubation at 37 °C the DNA-digests were collected by centrifugation. The elution was completed by passing two 80 μL aliquots of the buffer.

Determination of the total protein and nucleic acid content

Total protein and total peptide content were determined using a tryptophan-fluorescence assay as described previously [4]. The DNA and RNA content was determined by UV spectrometry using the extinction coefficient of 0.025 (μg/mL)−1 cm−1 at 260 nm for ribonucleotides and 0.030 (μg/mL)−1 cm−1 at 260 nm for deoxyribonucleotides.

LC-MS/MS and data analysis

Aliquots containing 6 µg of LysC peptide or 4 µg of tryptic peptides were separated on a reverse phase column and analyzed on QExactive mass spectrometer as described previously [5]. The MS data were analyzed within the software environment MaxQuant [version 1.2.6.20] [6], using the Andromeda search engine (http://www.maxquant.org). Proteins were identified by searching MS and MS/MS data of peptides against UniProtKB Escherichia coli (K12) database. The FDR threshold was derived by analyzing the decoy database. Carboamidomethylation of cysteines was set as fixed modification. The maximum false peptide discovery rate was specified as 0.01. Spectra were searched with K-specificity for LysC and K/R but not K/RP for trypsin. Protein abundance was calculated on the basis of spectral protein intensity using the total protein approach (TPA) [7].
Subject areaBiology, bacteriology
More specific subject areaBacterial proteome
Type of dataTable, Figure
How data was acquiredMass spectrometry using a Q Exactive mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany)
Data formatAnalyzed output data
Experimental factorsSDS lysates were processed using MED-FASP protocol
Experimental featuresLysC and tryptic peptides were analyzed by means of LC-MS/MS
Data source locationMartinsried, Germany
Data accessibilityThe data are with this article
Table 1
SequenceIdentified sequence
Missed cleavages (Lys-C)Number of not cleaved sites by LysC
Missed cleavages (Trypsin/P)Number of not cleaved sites by trypsin
MassPeptide mass
ProteinsUNIPROT ID
Gene namesGenes matching the peptide sequence
Protein namesProtein mathcing the peptide sequence
ChargesIon charges
PEPPosterior error probability
ScoreMaxQuant peptide score
Intensity LysC sample 1Spectral intesity of the peptide in LysC sample 1
Intensity LysC sample 2Spectral intesity of the peptide in LysC sample 2
Intensity LysC sample 3Spectral intesity of the peptide in LysC sample 3
Intensity trypsin sample 1Spectral intesity of the peptide in tryptic sample 1
Intensity trypsin sample 2Spectral intesity of the peptide in tryptic sample 2
Intensity trypsin sample 3Spectral intesity of the peptide in tryptic sample 3
Table 2
Protein namesProtein names (UNIPROT)
Gene namesGene names (UNIPROT)
Fasta headersprotein id FASTA header (UNIPROT)
ProteinsNumber of proteins in the protein group
PeptidesTotal number of identified peptides
Unique peptidesNumber of identified unique peptides
Peptides sample 1Total number of identified peptides in sample 1
Peptides sample 2Total number of identified peptides in sample 2
Peptides sample 3Total number of identified peptides in sample 3
Unique peptides sample 1Number of identified unique peptides in sample 1
Unique peptides sample 2Number of identified unique peptides in sample 2
Unique peptides sample 3Number of identified unique peptides in sample 3
Sequence coverage [%]Protein sequence coverage by all peptides
Unique sequence coverage [%]Protein sequence coverage by unique peptides
PEPPosterior error probability
Sequence coverage sample 1 [%]Protein sequence coverage by all peptides identiffied in sample 1
Sequence coverage sample 2 [%]Protein sequence coverage by all peptides identiffied in sample 2
Sequence coverage sample 3 [%]Protein sequence coverage by all peptides identiffied in sample 3
Intensity sample 1Summed spectral intesity of peptides matchin the protein id. In sample 1
Intensity sample 2Summed spectral intesity of peptides matchin the protein id. In sample 2
Intensity sample 3Summed spectral intesity of peptides matchin the protein id. In sample 3
Total intensity sample 1Sum of spectral intesities of all peptides identified in sample 1
Total intensity sample 2Sum of spectral intesities of all peptides identified in sample 2
Total intensity sample 3Sum of spectral intesities of all peptides identified in sample 3
Total protein sample 1Fraction of total protein in sample 1
Total protein sample 2Fraction of total protein in sample 2
Total protein sample 3Fraction of total protein in sample 3
Mol. weight [kDa]Molecular weight protein
Mol. weight [kDa]Molecular weight protein
Mol. weight [kDa]Molecular weight protein
concentration pmol/mg sample 1Protein concentration in sample 1
concentration pmol/mg sample 2Protein concentration in sample 2
concentration pmol/mg sample 3Protein concentration in sample 3
protein per cell (pg) sample 1Total protein content per cell in sample 1
protein per cell (pg) sample 2Total protein content per cell in sample 2
protein per cell (pg) sample 3Total protein content per cell in sample 3
copy number per cell sample 1Number of protein copies per cell in sample 1
copy number per cell sample 2Number of protein copies per cell in sample 2
copy number per cell sample 3Number of protein copies per cell in sample 3
Average copy numberAverage sample 1-3
  7 in total

1.  Comparison of ultrafiltration units for proteomic and N-glycoproteomic analysis by the filter-aided sample preparation method.

Authors:  Jacek R Wiśniewski; Dorota F Zielinska; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2010-12-06       Impact factor: 3.365

2.  MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification.

Authors:  Jürgen Cox; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-11-30       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Consecutive proteolytic digestion in an enzyme reactor increases depth of proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis.

Authors:  Jacek R Wiśniewski; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Proteomic workflow for analysis of archival formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded clinical samples to a depth of 10 000 proteins.

Authors:  Jacek R Wiśniewski; Kamila Duś; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Proteomics Clin Appl       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Multi-enzyme digestion FASP and the 'Total Protein Approach'-based absolute quantification of the Escherichia coli proteome.

Authors:  Jacek R Wiśniewski; Dariusz Rakus
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Proteomic sample preparation from formalin fixed and paraffin embedded tissue.

Authors:  Jacek R Wiśniewski
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 1.355

7.  Extensive quantitative remodeling of the proteome between normal colon tissue and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jacek R Wiśniewski; Paweł Ostasiewicz; Kamila Duś; Dorota F Zielińska; Florian Gnad; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.429

  7 in total
  12 in total

1.  Single-Run Mass Spectrometry Analysis Provides Deep Insight into E. coli Proteome.

Authors:  Bhaswati Chatterjee; Suman S Thakur
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  RNase E-based degradosome modulates polyadenylation of mRNAs after Rho-independent transcription terminators in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Kristen B Mildenhall; Nicholas Wiese; Daewhan Chung; Valerie F Maples; Bijoy K Mohanty; Sidney R Kushner
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.501

3.  Sample Preparation by Easy Extraction and Digestion (SPEED) - A Universal, Rapid, and Detergent-free Protocol for Proteomics Based on Acid Extraction.

Authors:  Joerg Doellinger; Andy Schneider; Marcell Hoeller; Peter Lasch
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Proline codon pair selection determines ribosome pausing strength and translation efficiency in bacteria.

Authors:  Ralph Krafczyk; Fei Qi; Alina Sieber; Judith Mehler; Kirsten Jung; Dmitrij Frishman; Jürgen Lassak
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-05-17

5.  Nonrefoldability is Pervasive Across the E. coli Proteome.

Authors:  Philip To; Briana Whitehead; Haley E Tarbox; Stephen D Fried
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 16.383

6.  Controlled Measurement and Comparative Analysis of Cellular Components in E. coli Reveals Broad Regulatory Changes in Response to Glucose Starvation.

Authors:  John R Houser; Craig Barnhart; Daniel R Boutz; Sean M Carroll; Aurko Dasgupta; Joshua K Michener; Brittany D Needham; Ophelia Papoulas; Viswanadham Sridhara; Dariya K Sydykova; Christopher J Marx; M Stephen Trent; Jeffrey E Barrick; Edward M Marcotte; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Large-scale analysis of post-translational modifications in E. coli under glucose-limiting conditions.

Authors:  Colin W Brown; Viswanadham Sridhara; Daniel R Boutz; Maria D Person; Edward M Marcotte; Jeffrey E Barrick; Claus O Wilke
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Thermal proteome profiling in bacteria: probing protein state in vivo.

Authors:  André Mateus; Jacob Bobonis; Nils Kurzawa; Frank Stein; Dominic Helm; Johannes Hevler; Athanasios Typas; Mikhail M Savitski
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Evolutionary analysis of polyproline motifs in Escherichia coli reveals their regulatory role in translation.

Authors:  Fei Qi; Magdalena Motz; Kirsten Jung; Jürgen Lassak; Dmitrij Frishman
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Identifying New Small Proteins in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Caitlin E VanOrsdel; John P Kelly; Brittany N Burke; Christina D Lein; Christopher E Oufiero; Joseph F Sanchez; Larry E Wimmers; David J Hearn; Fatimeh J Abuikhdair; Kathryn R Barnhart; Michelle L Duley; Sarah E G Ernst; Briana A Kenerson; Aubrey J Serafin; Matthew R Hemm
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.